dark light

880squadron

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 63 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SCOTTISH AIR FORCE #2224091
    880squadron
    Participant

    These look awesome. [ATTACH=CONFIG]231716[/ATTACH]

    The new ground to air missile being test fired.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2014 #878392
    880squadron
    Participant

    M11 Traffic

    So………
    does anyone have any nice pictures of the queues? Everyone likes pictures :stupid:

    Well, as you asked. Northbound at 08.30 approx.

    in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #878586
    880squadron
    Participant

    I made it to Duxford yesterday. Got there at 07.30, the car park for non-ticket holders was full, so I had to park a mile away and walk. Someone from Nottingham left home at 03.30 to get there for 05.30.

    When the Lancs arrived on time, the hairs on the back of my neck started moving. What a lovely site. Does anyone know what height they were restricted to, as they seemed quite high.

    When I left after Sally B flew, I walked from the entrance for 22 mins and there were still people looking at 15.15, standing in fields, sitting in parked cars on verges watching a mile away.

    Does anyone know how many were there? It was packed.

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2284537
    880squadron
    Participant

    So all the bodies containing shrapnel have not been sent for repatriation, and all the parts of the fuselage containing shrapnel holes have been carved off or otherwise removed, so the type of missile cannot be identified.

    Why else would the local AK47 shod militia prevent access other than to buy time to tamper with the evidence.

    If the plane was shot down by Ukrainians or NATO allied powers, why was the whole crime scene not made open to the investigators straight away.

    I am sorry Vlad the Dictator, I do not believe a word of what you are saying.

    Whenever “super powers” are involved, the truth is also a very early victim.

    298 dead pawns in a game of “super power” stop me if you dare.

    All very very sad for everyone associated with the victims.

    in reply to: Missing Malaysian Airlines B777 #495538
    880squadron
    Participant

    On the mobile phone contact theme, what would happen if a passenger became suspicious, sent a text, there was no signal over the sea, the text did not go, the plane then flew back over Malaysia, the phone was still turned on but the passenger was incapacitated due to hypoxia?

    Would the text get transmitted when the signal was restored, or would it need the passenger to send the resend button, which they couldn’t because they were incapacitated?

    Just worth knowing in case, God forbid, the same thing happens over the sea/ocean. Maybe send a text saying what happened, and put the phone carefully in a floaty cushion to become a message in a bottle.

    I have no doubt that no messages were received from any of the passengers, which does seem to point to hypoxia and everyone falling asleep. I cannot think the plane was working normally when it flew back over Malaysia with all the passengers wondering why the map was not working, with not one of them trying to make phone contact.

    I managed to get some very adult TV programs (by mistake when scanning through) on a 3″ battery TV in the mid 1990’s over Germany at 30,000+ ft, so a signal must be possible up there.

    880squadron
    Participant

    The Mk XV Seafire had an extra 90 gallon tank fitted central underneath in the Far East in 1945, and had a range of about 3h20m maximum. I think they cruised at around 220 mph, so that would give them a range of around 730 miles. Berlin is around 580 miles away, and Seafire VXs got through around 1 gallon per minute.

    So by my calculations, 1200 mile round trip, 5 hours 30 mins, = 330 mins. Even with the 90 gallon extra tanks, they still only had 180 gallons, so they would be gliding home.

    in reply to: Who can spot the howler? Spitfire quiz. #938254
    880squadron
    Participant

    ‘Disabling’ it…..is it still up there???

    I was told, when learning to fly, that the idea was to keep the number of take-off and landings the same !

    Next time I am in the Pimlico area I will have a look.

    in reply to: Spotted 2013 #942299
    880squadron
    Participant

    Dakota in invasion markings over Foulsham Norfolk at about 500ft at 14.50 today flying NW.

    in reply to: Spitfire – Where and when? #945192
    880squadron
    Participant

    Its Mk XIX PM631, during its time with BBMF.

    Its tied down for an engine run – presumably at some power looking at the tie downs.

    I know no more!

    Bruce

    A Mk XIX with a 4 bladed prop? Tie downs to 120kg of building blocks? 2050 HP? I am not convinced.

    in reply to: Spitfire – Where and when? #945342
    880squadron
    Participant

    If it is a Mk IX, there are very few with P ??31 ever built, and most went to Russia.

    The hollow concrete blocks it its tied down to look exactly the same as I built my garage out of ten years ago, and each weigh about 22kg.

    The squadron AD marking is for a squadron (113, 251, or 60) which apparently flew bombers or recon planes.

    Maybe it is awaiting burial at the end of the runway.

    in reply to: Spitfire – Where and when? #945549
    880squadron
    Participant

    PA931 at Gatwick Airport awaiting to be scrapped.

    in reply to: Spitfire Spotted on Trailer on way to Hendon #952286
    880squadron
    Participant

    It’s a FSM – see reference to it in this link:
    http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/london/whats-going-on/events/battle-of-britain-week/

    Tim

    That would explain perfectly why it is not being flown !

    But they already have a model in the entrance next to the Hurricane. I presume you can get up close and personal to the full scale model, but I would prefer to see the real thing.

    It is not every day you see a Spitfire fuselage being transported, so I was curious as to why it was being moved by road, and not flown.

    in reply to: Junkers JU-52 visits White Waltham #956895
    880squadron
    Participant

    went out and back over Brooklands this evening as well heading West under 1000ft at 1915, as the para doors were closed I put the pitchfork away..

    They don’t like the cold steel sir, they don’t like it up’em.

    in reply to: Junkers JU-52 visits White Waltham #956923
    880squadron
    Participant

    Well that explains what I saw over Hendon yesterday and posted about.

    Just so long as no paratroopers jump out, and the church bells start ringing.

    in reply to: 2 Junkers ju52 at Goodwood in 2006 #957696
    880squadron
    Participant

    Anyone else see a Ju 52 flying over Hendon (RAF museum fly past?) early this evening? I thought it was a Dakota from its sound and shape, until I put my glasses on and saw the third engine.

    I am not aware of anything else that looks similar with 3 engines, so I think it must have been a Ju52.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 63 total)