dark light

mrmalaya

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 4,258 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News #2148902
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    Perhaps we shouldn’t continue in this thread, I will post in the Japanese one.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2148922
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    Or as Halloweene points out, BAE/UK Gov could be very motivated in the near future to partner with Japan and offer something that both countries are going to buy rather than a random modernisation of the F22 that hobbles Japan aerospace manufacturing permanently.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2149857
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    Every cell in my being cries out not to get drawn into a 2002 style discussion on this, but the fact is that Typhoon will be taking over the Storm Shadow launch role in a matter of months when Tornado bows out.

    If the RAF want it to carry two missiles underwing then it will carry two and use the tankers they have. If they decide this is too much like had work (they are very proud of their tanking capability though, its almost like they enjoy it), then CFTs may appear. At this stage CFTs dont seem to be that important.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2149966
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    What a dumb thing to say about Typhoon.

    in reply to: Anglo-French UCAV (FCAS) #2153250
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    FCAS will progress according to the UK MOD, following meeting of the two departments:

    https://twitter.com/DefenceHQ/status/979344954878255105

    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2153253
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    Well, I’m off to Mauritius tomorrow, so they better hurry up!!:D

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2153343
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    I can’t get enough images of the F35 at sea.

    Not long till the UK gets its turn.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2153473
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    I’m not sure that is true. There are increased mutterings about a T4 Typhoon order in the UK too (all unofficial but related to supporting the UK aerospace defence industry immediately rather than in 15 years time).

    in reply to: Anglo-French UCAV (FCAS) #2154006
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    …and now the third option of the UK just pursuing a cheaper wingman type UCAV (a la Kratos). This has been around since February as an official MOD tender for ideas and may account for the stalling of FCAS.

    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2154011
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    According to AW&ST the UK is looking at a UCAV that is not FCAS:

    http://aviationweek.com/awindefense/britain-takes-new-direction-ucav

    Any thoughts?

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2154216
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    ooookay….

    I wasn’t being fallacious. I assume it takes a significant number of man-hours to build and train these units which then are potentially exposed to a counter strike when they launch. Are you saying that this was their first shot based on the fact that they have filmed it?!

    I only talk about this incident by the way. I’m not talking about Turkish/Syrian/Russian attack aircraft at low level.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2154234
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    Thanks for replying TR1.

    The video just seemed strangely truncated, but if Janes says its true, then….

    If the consensus is that a shot like this only works with an older F15, I wonder if they fired lots of homemade SAMs before finding one that was worth putting on YouTube (or the equivalent), or if they got lucky first time.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2154274
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    Is there any reason why that report is credible? I can’t read Russian and don’t think much of the images used, but you might be able to add some context?

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2155814
    mrmalaya
    Participant

    Do not engage with JSR .

    mrmalaya
    Participant

    I would say that the potential shared ground for the UK and Japan is fairly obvious- timelines, operational need and technical abilities dovetail quite nicely. I don’t think the UK will repeat the Eurofighter experience with France/Germany etc, the Turkish fighter is not what the UK will want or need and that leaves us with a joint project with the US.

    The latter is undesirable because it is likely that we will be involved in producing F35s for over a generation and the chance of any sovereign design work is slim on a future US led F22/Typhoon replacement project.

    As to Japan not wanting to upset the US with a UK/Japanese project: the F22 was denied them, so they bought the F35 (and will likely do so again) without any resistance. That is an established procurement route that will be ongoing for decades. Why should they buy more US equipment than that? Is Japan a US colony?

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 4,258 total)