Engine for Tejas MK2 , comparision between EJ200 and F414 ( courtesy IDR )
thanks for that austin, but it has been long time since you have posted force articles. you were posting them regularly in KeyPub.
Engine for Tejas MK2 , comparision between EJ200 and F414 ( courtesy IDR )
thanks for that austin, but it has been long time since you have posted force articles. you were posting them regularly in KeyPub.
Name a country or countries that won’t purchase the F-35 based on ToT Transfer. 😉
i had this doubt on F-35. will it ever be offered for license production to countries like India?. why only the partner countries are allowed license produce? Is it like F-35 tech is too sensitive to be license produced by other countries?, this could be an imp factor in case of India, but we are unlikely to acquire large no. of fighters or any kind of arms without license production.
Today is the Keel Laying of the FIRT IAC. I really hope no further demands of increase in price of Vikramaditya is met and the current Viraat is given a good refit. The harriers onboard it are all upgraded with Elta Radars 🙂 and Israeli missiles.
unlikely that IAC will be delivered ontime. we take so many yrs to build even a frigate.
the problem with Gorshy our adamant Govt will neither cancel the deal or agree with Russian price, Babus will frustrate everyone including russians and navy by bargaining for many years.
Yes but only to a certan level and can have problems that comes with it. For example if is hard to imagine that france will offer the best tech to us for the MKI as it does on the Rafale.
if France doesn’t then Israel and Russia will. anywayz it doesn’t matter, IAF is not looking for fighter which should be better than Su-30MKI. SH is one strong contendor but doubtful how far US would TOT the AESA etc.
Yes but only to a certan level and can have problems that comes with it. For example if is hard to imagine that france will offer the best tech to us for the MKI as it does on the Rafale.
if France doesn’t then Israel and Russia will. anywayz it doesn’t matter, IAF is not looking for fighter which should be better than Su-30MKI. SH is one strong contendor but doubtful how far US would TOT the AESA etc.
Yes the Bars and the Ibris E are very capable. Radar is only one of techs I mentioned there is a lot more than that which we don;t have. Why do you think we are insistent on ToT. I think the Rafale, EF and Super Hornet will give the Su 30 a run for its money in BVR. 🙂
we ask TOT for every large aquisition. Hawk, Su-30, T-90, MMRCA, Scorpene every big aquisition. Thats the way Indias DPP works. its also a way reduce defence imports.
We are not looking for fighters which offer capabilities, that are not availaible with Su-30. That was actually never mentioned anywhere. except for SH and F-15E with their AESAs, none of them in the market would actually offer anything special.
Due to flankers open-ended archiecture, It can be upgraded with weapons and avionics from various countries. So we can get the best of Europe, Israel and Russia to Flanker besides indigenous avonics. Thats the basic advantage for MKI. My point is there is no need buy new MMRCA to bridge any gap, MKI itself can be upgraded into one. This is unless we want SH with Radars, Missiles and munitions.
I think the Rafale, EF and Super Hornet will give the Su 30 a run for its money in BVR.
and vice versa.
Yes the Bars and the Ibris E are very capable. Radar is only one of techs I mentioned there is a lot more than that which we don;t have. Why do you think we are insistent on ToT. I think the Rafale, EF and Super Hornet will give the Su 30 a run for its money in BVR. 🙂
we ask TOT for every large aquisition. Hawk, Su-30, T-90, MMRCA, Scorpene every big aquisition. Thats the way Indias DPP works. its also a way reduce defence imports.
We are not looking for fighters which offer capabilities, that are not availaible with Su-30. That was actually never mentioned anywhere. except for SH and F-15E with their AESAs, none of them in the market would actually offer anything special.
Due to flankers open-ended archiecture, It can be upgraded with weapons and avionics from various countries. So we can get the best of Europe, Israel and Russia to Flanker besides indigenous avonics. Thats the basic advantage for MKI. My point is there is no need buy new MMRCA to bridge any gap, MKI itself can be upgraded into one. This is unless we want SH with Radars, Missiles and munitions.
I think the Rafale, EF and Super Hornet will give the Su 30 a run for its money in BVR.
and vice versa.
Which is very good to know but i doubt the Tejas or Su 30 will be able to compare with the latest American/European tech. ToT for MRCA is to bridge the gap in this regard. Let us first see MK2 specs atleast before commending on sensor fusion.
dude flanker has Bars Radar, its comparable to even modern AESA inservice. you would have read about how eager western countries are in spying about Bars capabilities. Flanker also has European/israeli tech . you just cannot underestimate it. i dunt see anything in MMRCA birds (which isn’t already availaible with MKI) except the AESA may be , but MKI most likely will get more powerful Bars or Irbis.
ultimately its not the MMRCA or LCA, its the MKI which going to lead Indias airbattle. and even if there is a gap, there is noway can bridge that by license producing MMRCA. license production has helped India in no way to develop new birds.
Which is very good to know but i doubt the Tejas or Su 30 will be able to compare with the latest American/European tech. ToT for MRCA is to bridge the gap in this regard. Let us first see MK2 specs atleast before commending on sensor fusion.
dude flanker has Bars Radar, its comparable to even modern AESA inservice. you would have read about how eager western countries are in spying about Bars capabilities. Flanker also has European/israeli tech . you just cannot underestimate it. i dunt see anything in MMRCA birds (which isn’t already availaible with MKI) except the AESA may be , but MKI most likely will get more powerful Bars or Irbis.
ultimately its not the MMRCA or LCA, its the MKI which going to lead Indias airbattle. and even if there is a gap, there is noway can bridge that by license producing MMRCA. license production has helped India in no way to develop new birds.
India approves £1.7bn plan to launch astronauts as Asian space race hots up
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5789385.ece
India has approved a £1.7 billion plan to launch its first astronauts into space by 2015, in its latest bid to close the gap with China in what many see as a 21st Century Asian version of the Cold War race for the Moon.
The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) will attempt to put two people into orbit 172 miles (275 km) above the Earth for seven days, according to a proposal approved by the Planning Commission at a meeting on Friday.
“ISRO needs to be supported as it has done marvellous job in the field of Space Science. That’s why Planning Commission will support it,” Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission, told reporters.
“An unmanned flight will be launched in 2013-2014 and manned mission likely to launch by 2014-2015,” he said.
The Cabinet must still sign off on the plan, but that is expected to be a formality now that the Planning Commission has approved it, S. Satish, a spokesman for ISRO, told The Times.
The decision follows ISRO’s successful launch in October of India’s first unmanned lunar mission, Chandrayaan-1, which is now orbiting the Moon to compile a 3-D map of its surface among other things.
That mission catapulted India into the world’s most elite club, rubbing shoulders with the United States, Russia, Japan and China as the only countries capable of independently reaching the Moon.
India’s second unmanned lunar mission, Chandrayaan-2, is already scheduled to be launched in 2011.
ISRO has also been lobbying for years to secure government funding for its plans to send an astronaut into space by 2014 – eleven years after China – and to the Moon by 2020, four years ahead of China’s target date.
Critics say ISRO’s plans are a waste of money in a country where the 76 per cent of the population of 1.1 billion live on less than $2 a day, and child malnutrition levels are on a par with sub-Saharan Africa.
But ISRO argues that India makes money from commercial satellite launches, and scientific research from the space programme has helped to develop its information technology industry.
Indian officials, especially in the military, are also concerned that India lags far behind China, which shot down a satellite in 2007 and completed its first space walk last year.
Richard Fischer Jr, a senior fellow on Asian Military Affairs at the International Assessment and Strategy Centre, said last week that India needed to review its space programme to confront the military threat from China.
“We have to look forward to China performing military activities from the Moon,” he said.
ISRO’s ambitious plans were given a significant boost last week when the government increased its budget for this year by 27 per cent to 44.6 billion rupees (£613m).
Of that, 1.75 billion rupees (£24m) is to be spent on training astronauts and other space science personnel – representing a 73 percent increase over last year.
K Radhakrishnan, a member of India’s Space Commission and Director of the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, said the budget approved last Friday would cover development of a new space vehicle.
“We are planning to put persons in the vehicle and launch them into space for seven days in an orbit of 275 km,” he told reporters.
ISRO says the vehicle will be launched on a modified version of ISRO’s Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle Mark 2, which is currently under development and is due to be tested for the first time later this year.
Russia will help to build the astronaut capsule and select and train the astronauts under an agreement signed in December on a state visit to India by Dmitry Medvedev, Russia’s President.
The agreement also stipulates that an Indian astronaut will fly aboard a Russian Soyuz spacecraft in 2013, making him or her only the second Indian ever to enter orbit.
Rakesh Sharma, the first Indian in space, was sent into orbit in 1984 on board a Soyuz capsule launched by the Soviet Union, which supported India’s space programme throughout the Cold War.
The above is a logistics and maintenance issue only. Su-30 MKI can also be made to be “hassle free” in terms of maintenance etc.
Su-30 MKI will also be equipped with all types of A2G weapons, especially HARM-type missiles, precision guided munitions, Brahmos missile, etc.
in that case why do u think IAF is not interested in ordering more flankers.
The above is a logistics and maintenance issue only. Su-30 MKI can also be made to be “hassle free” in terms of maintenance etc.
Su-30 MKI will also be equipped with all types of A2G weapons, especially HARM-type missiles, precision guided munitions, Brahmos missile, etc.
in that case why do u think IAF is not interested in ordering more flankers.
coming to Su-30MKI, i was thinking about its payload. it can carry 12 270 Kg Bombs and 2 R-77s under its fuselage, that still leaves 8 underwing hardpoints. thats 3200 kg of bombs and it uses just 2 hardpoints for that.
Gripen NG was shown with multimissile launcher, i.e two missiles on each hardpoints. Imagine if they can do the same for a beast like flanker. that would allow it to carry sufficient missiles for self defence even during A2G missions.
Is multimissile launcher for AAMs right now being implemented with Rafale or Typhoon?
what are challenges involved with this.
coming to Su-30MKI, i was thinking about its payload. it can carry 12 270 Kg Bombs and 2 R-77s under its fuselage, that still leaves 8 underwing hardpoints. thats 3200 kg of bombs and it uses just 2 hardpoints for that.
Gripen NG was shown with multimissile launcher, i.e two missiles on each hardpoints. Imagine if they can do the same for a beast like flanker. that would allow it to carry sufficient missiles for self defence even during A2G missions.
Is multimissile launcher for AAMs right now being implemented with Rafale or Typhoon?
what are challenges involved with this.