dark light

Dobbins

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 456 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #881130
    Dobbins
    Participant

    http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/13%202015/01%20Duxford/366.jpg~original

    Great photo!

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #886802
    Dobbins
    Participant

    I didn’t think the B-25 was going back in? I’m surprised the Harvard and PT-17 are going back too. Well, if that’s the order then it means that everything above the B-29 on the list will be dangling from the rafters… though maybe not the U-2..???

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #887011
    Dobbins
    Participant

    She has unique and interesting nose art. The B25 would look great with invasion stripes and nose art. Future generations need to be inspired and B17s with nude women on them certainly got my interest then I started building airfix, going to airshows etc

    I was joking

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #890185
    Dobbins
    Participant

    ‘Whoever came up with this ridiculous idea of painting RAFM aircraft in only the schemes that they wore?’

    I guess whoever thought that the RAFM should be a museum and not a theme park ?

    Get rid of S-Sugar as well, she’d look so much better as Gibson’s Admiral Prune or AJ-G…

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #890193
    Dobbins
    Participant

    If it looks as good as the B24 it will be great. Whoever came up with this ridiculous idea of painting RAFM aircraft in only the schemes that they wore? The tempest is ok as its colourful, but the B25 says nothing

    I have decided that I would rather see what the original aircraft looked like instead of some populist nonsense to please the masses. What other type of museums would display artefacts that were not portraying their real history? Take the AAM as a prime example, you had ‘Bush’s Avenger’ hovering over Hawg Wild – how do you explain to the masses of people that one of these is a genuine scheme, the other isn’t, and the rationale behind it? How many people passed through the AAM thinking that they had seen the real Bush Avenger? (yes, I know he kept getting shot down!) For many years I was disappointed by the non-USAAF schemes on the RAFM’s B-24 and P-47, but now I accept them as being true to the aircraft concerned.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #897938
    Dobbins
    Participant

    I can only see two, where’s the other one…?

    Isn’t the hi viz ‘hi viz’ enough!!

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #912964
    Dobbins
    Participant

    It did however seem to be designed with two huge flaws, concrete dust raining down from the ceiling and no doors.

    The elevated entrance was supposed to create the ‘wow factor’ by being level with the B-52. I’m sure the B-52 would look better facing the glass but there wouldn’t be enough clearance for the tail.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #913073
    Dobbins
    Participant

    The simple fact is it has kept those exhibits pristine for nearly 20 years thus freeing up room so that other aircraft can go in the main hangars.

    I’m not sure how ‘pristine’ some of them are. Lots of bits got nicked, the B-29 glazing got scratched and at one point there were footprints on top of the Huey!!

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #913359
    Dobbins
    Participant

    Does anyone have any idea what the “re modelling” of the AAM will actually be like when it’s finished ??

    Despite my best efforts with Google I can’t find any information at all.

    David

    I don’t think it will look drastically different, but they want to concentrate on personal stories and the last 2 decades of the UK/US relationship, whatever that means.

    Bit of info here
    http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Imperial-War-Museum-Duxford-s-American-Air-Museum/story-26106989-detail/story.html

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #913529
    Dobbins
    Participant

    Those AAM photos are brilliant. Just shows what a daft building it is!

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #914261
    Dobbins
    Participant

    I can’t say that the colour scheme does much for me either.

    Same here, but I’m coming round to the idea of preferring to see aircraft in their original finishes (or at least colour schemes that they once wore). I know a lot has been said on here about painting Buchons as 109s and all that, but it’s the same with ‘genuine’ aircraft too. How many people would have looked at the ‘Bush’ Avenger, for example, and thought that it was the real deal? Mixing the two together gets pretty confusing.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #915221
    Dobbins
    Participant

    Surely they can’t get all of the AAM aircraft in the same building ?

    There’s always the ceiling… don’t forget the ceiling…

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #920012
    Dobbins
    Participant

    I wish they’d kept the B24 nose as well.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #920370
    Dobbins
    Participant

    I never noticed the missing Bombaimers glazing on the B24?

    I believe the nose was heavily modified for ‘ice research’, though looking at some photos of her during restoration the area had not yet been faired over.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #922499
    Dobbins
    Participant

    At risk of sounding like the roundel police, is that really a period typeface for the Hurricane’s serial? I don’t recall seeing another one like it.

    Adrian

    Looks a bit ‘Arial’…!

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 456 total)