dark light

Unicorn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 465 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2004857
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Submarine Commander ‘Misread Chart’
    I don’t know much about submarine operations but is the fact that the sub was struggling to reach 18 knots a bit worrying. i thought the Swifture should be capable of 25-30knots+?

    Given the evidence in court, as listed in the article, the ship was suffering mechanical difficulties.

    Captain Stuart Crozier, prosecuting, told the hearing that the submarine had been suffering from technical problems, causing it to lose speed, at the time of the incident in May 2008.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2004858
    Unicorn
    Participant

    By forcing it to try and evade sonar and the helicopters, they force it to generate more noise, allowing the pursuer to determine the nation operating the sub, and in many cases, the exact sub they are chasing.

    If it is a conventional sub, they can hold it down until it runs out of both battery charge and air, forcing it to surface.

    If it is a nuclear sub, then that sort of narrows it down to five navies, making identification somewhat easier.

    Unicorn

    Unicorn
    Participant

    Hawkdriver, we get what you mean, it’s just you are arguing that you ‘know’ something that is subject to a lot of external factors between now and the ships entering service.

    You have made your thoughts, opinions and views on this subject very well known to everyone on this thread, perhaps it’s time to let the matter rest.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Australia and UK DDL proposal #2007560
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Sorry for some thread necromancy, but as my DDL is now almost finished (needs detailing for things like guardrails, flight deck netting and such) I thought I would post some images as requested by Mr Worsley.

    http://i554.photobucket.com/albums/jj419/Unicorn1111/Kokoda01-1.jpg

    http://i554.photobucket.com/albums/jj419/Unicorn1111/Kokoda02-1.jpg

    http://i554.photobucket.com/albums/jj419/Unicorn1111/Kokoda03.jpg

    http://i554.photobucket.com/albums/jj419/Unicorn1111/Kokoda04.jpg

    A couple of addendums. Based on the plans that the RAN had, there was no way that a Wessex was ever going to fit on these ships. The drawings had a stylised Lynx on the back and the hangars were sized for Lynx.

    There is no way they could have operated the Sea Sprite, and the Seahawk is a tight fit.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Film of the way carrier landings used to be in the RN #2053795
    Unicorn
    Participant

    I remember seeing that episode.

    What the excerpt doesn’t show is a comment made immediately after it concludes, to the effect that that pilot did not have a bolter for the rest of the cruise.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Manouverbility not as obsolete as i thought! #2466527
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Gentlemen, The noted Col. Grisha Medved is, to the best of the knowledge of the Australian Defence Community, a fiction.

    One dreamed up by the people at Air Power Australia to provide some level of ‘authenticity’ to their claims.

    The supposed tortured English syntax used is the English that someone who does not speak Russian believes would be used by a Russian speaking English.

    Ask yourselves how a pair of amateurs in Australia somehow managed to obtain a source who can both speak so authoritatively on the subject and also support absolutely every point that APA is trying to make AND provide them with a level of intelligence and insider info that the West has, to this point, supposedly been unable to obtain?

    Sorry guys, if you believe the good Colonel exists, I have a Kremlin I want to sell you.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Idiot question #2072315
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Which is precisely why the RAN is evaluating CEA-FAR for future deployment across the fleet.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Royal Navy Type 4x: Delays and Program Setbacks #2072571
    Unicorn
    Participant

    C – D – A 🙂

    Unicorn

    in reply to: RN Type-XX Poll: Redefine priorities! #2072806
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Vote here is for

    B. Most logical, role specification worked for the Type 42 / Type 22, so it should here.

    A. While I wouldn’t use exactly those words I do believe the capability is there to build to that size.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: RN Type-4X Poll: SAM #2073108
    Unicorn
    Participant

    For me I prefer to go with something real rather than be saddled with either an orphan or development costs.

    Sign me up for

    1. G

    2. B

    3. D

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2073536
    Unicorn
    Participant

    SELECTION OF SONAR SYSTEM FOR THE AIR WARFARE DESTROYER PROJECT

    The Minister for Defence, the Hon. Joel Fitzgibbon MP has congratulated the Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD) Alliance in achieving an important milestone in the AWD project with the selection of Ultra Electronics as the preferred supplier of the sonar system for the AWDs.

    “I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate Ultra Electronics for being selected to supply this key capability for Australia’s future AWDs,” Mr Fitzgibbon said.

    Following a rigorous tender process, Mr Fitzgibbon was advised by the CEO of the Defence Materiel Organisation (DMO), Dr Stephen Gumley and the Chief of the Capability Development Group, Vice Admiral Matt Tripovich, that the selection of Ultra Electronics will ensure the AWDs are equipped with a sonar system that provides excellent anti-submarine and torpedo defence capability.

    “The selection of the sonar system is a key milestone for the AWD Alliance and represents the first of a series of important equipment selections the team will make in the next few months,” Mr Fitzgibbon said.

    “I also note Ultra Electronics has committed to undertake more than 50 per cent of its AWD sonar systems work in Australia, which represents a great result for Australian Industry.”

    The AWD Alliance will shortly be issuing Requests for Tender to selected companies for work on the ships’ hull blocks, as well as work on other elements of the ships’ combat systems.

    As one of the largest and most complex defence acquisition programs currently underway in Australia, Mr Fitzgibbon said the Government was closely monitoring the progress of the AWD project and the AWD Alliance.

    The AWD Alliance includes DMO, Raytheon Australia and the Australian Submarine Corporation.

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2073537
    Unicorn
    Participant

    AUSTRALIA AND MALAYSIA PARTICIPATE IN COMBINED MARITIME EXERCISE

    The Royal Australian Navy has today commenced Mastex, a combined maritime warfare exercise with the Royal Malaysian Navy in waters north of Darwin.

    Taking part in the week long exercise are Adelaide Class Frigate HMAS Melbourne with an embarked Seahawk helicopter and Armidale Class Patrol Boat HMAS Maryborough, alongside Royal Malaysian Navy ship KD Jebat with a Super Lynx helicopter.

    The Royal Australian Air Force will support the exercise with Hawks from 79 Squadron and one P-3 Orion from 92 Wing.

    PEL-AIR Aviation Australia will participate, providing realistic maritime strike and air combat support * towing air targets for anti air warfare.

    The Mastex exercise aims to progress interoperability in areas common to both Navies and will be comprised of a wide range of security and warfare exercises and evolutions. Scheduled exercises include; Air Firings against towed targets, officer of the watch manoeuvres, boarding exercises and air warfare serials.

    The Commander Australian Patrol Boat Group, Captain Vaughan Rixon, CSC, ADC, RAN said at the opening ceremony on Saturday, “This iteration of Mastex will build on the exercises’ past successes, and provides a vital opportunity for the Navies of Australia and Malaysia to work together to improve our combined maritime warfare procedures and tactics.”

    “The exercise once again reaffirms the strong ties between the Royal Australian Navy and Royal Malaysian Navy,” he said.

    in reply to: RN Type-4X Poll: Anti-Ballistic-Missile capability #2073538
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Hmmm,

    I would vote for A only, as I have previously selected other Mk-41 LS compatible weaponry and the others are not compatible.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2073554
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Naval high command public self gratification.

    I.e Admirals wanking.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: RN Type-4X Poll: Main Gun #2073555
    Unicorn
    Participant

    My choice is

    1. B
    2. C

    As you can upgrade from one to the other as suggested, and continue to make use of the current RN logistics setup.

    Unicorn

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 465 total)