dark light

Unicorn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 465 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aussies repel Iranian Gunboat #2057104
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Several.

    Much of the Iranian petrol productin infrastructure was located within range of Iraqi bombers during the Iran – Iraq war and were prime targets, with some completely destroyed and many of the remainder badly damaged.

    Thus the seeds were sown for the limitations in Iranian domestic petrol refining capacity seen today.

    So why haven’t they built new ones I hear you say?

    The US embargo on financing any construction in Iran (and a similar ban is in place in the UK and much of the EU). Companies are strange like that, they like to be paid, with lots of hard cash up front and regular progress payments.

    But Iran can finance it themselves I hear you say?

    The main companies who could build the Mullah’s their petrol refining facilities are affiliated with the major oil companies, all of who hate the Mullahs with a passion, as Khomeini and his merry gang nationalised the foreign oil company’s assets after the Islamic revolution in Iran.

    The construction companies are not going to piiss off their main customers and business partners to do deals with a bunch of West-hating clerics.

    Surely there are non-Western construction companies who would do the construction you ask?

    Indeed, however the demand for refining capability worldwide is such that they have a long list of other, less politically unacceptable customers to build for first, Anyway, very few of them want to really piiss of the US, because the industry is a small one, and what comes around, goes around.

    Thus Iran has to buy most of the petrol it uses, which suits the oil companies, the US and the other oil producing countries.

    Hope this helps.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Anzac Class vs Adelaide Class? #2057132
    Unicorn
    Participant

    As has been indicated by several people here already the RAN S-70Bs are embarked on the ANZACs. A quick search of the DOD image gallery reveals frequent references to ANZAC’s Seahawk helicopter doing things. No image of the aircraft in the hangar, apart from a shot of engine maintenance in progress, however having seen the Seasprite on one of the RNZN ships it must be a very tight fit. Meanwhile, the RAN’s future NH90 was designed with such hangar dimensions in mind and might fit, just.

    A few shots of the real thing and a scale model. Plenty of room on the Anzac for a Sea Hawk.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Aussies repel Iranian Gunboat #2057146
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Driving the price of oil higher would be an interesting strategy. Given the sentiment that Ahmadinejad has been ignoring the Iranian economy, which is in need of some sort of reform or assistance, driving the price of oil up would at least provide them with some additional revenue.

    Not really, Iran, due to a lack of refining infrastructure, is a net importer of petrol. They export oil at$XX and import petrol at $XX + 15%

    Higher prices mean more money in the government coffers, but they have to import petrol to meet domestic demand and the public gets very restive when the price of petrol soars, so the government has to subsidise the price of petrol at the bowser.

    Higher prices are a two edged sword for the Iranian government.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Sea Swap around the world #2057307
    Unicorn
    Participant

    The USN, RN and French Navy use two crews on their ballistic missile submarines to maximise operational readiness of these assets.

    The USN call them Blue and Gold crews, not sure about the others.

    The PRC’s single boomer spends so little time at sea that they probably don’t need two crews, and the Russian Navy may be drifting into the same boat as numbers of boomers decline.

    in reply to: Sea Swap around the world #2057362
    Unicorn
    Participant

    The RAN has looked at it, principally for ships deployed to the Persian / Arabian Gulf.

    Nothing concrete came out of it, mostly because the RAN doesn’t trust the ship maintenance capabilities in that part of the world.

    Unicorn

    Unicorn
    Participant

    I’m looking for 5 things currently:
    1. 052D starting in Changxing (the new JiangNan location) early next year. Although pictures might come slow since the new shipyard is actually further away from the land area.
    2. The mysterious LPH that they are supposedly going to build. I’m guessing anytime before 2010 is possible?
    3. A new class of SSK probably at Changxing again.
    4. A possible Corvette/sub-chaser class – I’m really iffy on this, only mentioning it because it’s clearly missing in PLAN and also that they need something to replace Type 37 just like Type 22 replacing Type 21.
    5. 054B class using CODOG propulsion (this is based on what Richard Fisher reported recently)

    You left out aircraft carrier developments.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Anzac Class vs Adelaide Class? #2057477
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Mconrads, re the Sea Wraith, I will see what I can do.

    Fed / Ja, a mate of mine attended the Meko Group meeting in Europe and they discussed different CIWS fits (mostly Phalanx, the Turks with Sea Zenith, a few people saying they had looked at Goalkeeper and a lot of discussion about missile based CIWS).

    The Turks praised the Sea Zenith system to the skies in open discussions, but privately admitted that it was a maintenance nightmare, partly due the mount being overly complex and partly because the vibration Fed mentioned was hard on the cabling and mechanicals.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Anzac Class vs Adelaide Class? #2057556
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Every vessel in the club is in the same scale of 1:72 (1 inch equates to 6 feet hence the name Task Force 72) and they are all radio controlled running models.

    Smallest vessel is the tug Bronzewing, some 6 inches long, while the largest are the carrier Enterprise (CVN65) and the battleships Bismark, Yamato and Hood.

    A shot taken one running day.

    Enjoy

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Anzac Class vs Adelaide Class? #2057584
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Yes, you can find more stuff at http://www.taskforce72.org/

    Including this shot which should interest Mconrads.

    http://www.taskforce72.org/images/200-26111lrg.jpg

    http://www.taskforce72.org/images/halsublge.jpg

    Shots of the proposed air capable Spruance.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: AWD (F-100) vs T-45 vs Horzion #2057588
    Unicorn
    Participant

    The RAN really, really, really want two hangars.

    They deploy a lot further afield than the Spanish Navy, and it’s a long way to go to get a replacement if something happens to the one you have.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: AWD (F-100) vs T-45 vs Horzion #2057642
    Unicorn
    Participant

    The design will be modified from the baseline F100 design to meet a number of RAN minimum design criterias.

    These are still being negotiated however they will alter the base vessel somewhat.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Anzac Class vs Adelaide Class? #2057644
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Indeed it is a SPY-1F design. I believe it was a paper design created by Tenix before they settled on the design they proposed to the RAN.

    The SPY arrays are awfully low down (probably to reduce topweight issues) to be truly effective (and I would not liked to have been on the upper decks when they were radiating!).

    Glad you like them, my friends are very creative (I build them too, but nowhere near as well as their efforts).

    The club I am in, Task Force 72, has everything from US Civil War monitors to ships that have not yet left the drawing board, such as this one, VT’s Sea Wraith.

    Enjoy

    Unicorn

    Unicorn
    Participant

    No, you are fine Mconrads. What I meant was that I am dissappointed that the Gibbs & Cox design was not chosen, I believe that the F100 was a poor choice.

    I meant that it is a shame you are not going to be doing updated images of the G&C AWD design as it nears service with the RAN.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: AWD (F-100) vs T-45 vs Horzion #2057767
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Whoi the hell knows, its still a paper design until we see the changes incorporated by the RAN.

    It will be more capable than what it is replacing, which is always a good thing.

    Unicorn

    in reply to: Lerici class mine hunters drawings #2057770
    Unicorn
    Participant

    Back to that drawing board Mconrads, keep them coming.

    Unicorn

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 465 total)