dark light

XN923

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,083 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Javelin vs Sea Vixen #1252650
    XN923
    Participant

    It would be one thing to physically fit a Spey into a Lightning or Sea Vixen, but something else to redesign the intakes to cope with amount of air that flows through a Spey.
    FWIW I’m firmly in the Sea Vixen camp. The Javelin always seemed like a bodge too many to me.

    William

    Right – it’s a question of mass flow. Look at the mods that had to be made to the Buccaneer to get the Speys to fit (not to mention the Phantom) – the engine fit wasn’t an issue but the intake and exhaust had to be made a lot bigger. Not too much of an issue on the subsonic, non afterburning Bucc, but with the Mach 2 Phantom it caused many problems resulting in the most expensive, most delayed, lowest performing Phantoms in the world!

    That said, I’d love to have seen the Sea Vixen developed further. It’s a shame when you see examples of great British design having their lives cut short because the bean counters think they know better. The Sea Vixen might have been big enough to make the necessary alterations. The Lightning I fear would have been quart-in-a-pint-pot stuff.

    in reply to: Grainy pics #460991
    XN923
    Participant

    Thanks all.

    They were scanned by my local Fuji lab. I have a scanner at home but rarely get good results on it.

    Is there a film I can switch to that will improve the situation with regard to the graining?

    I will try those settings. Thanks again.

    in reply to: F-35 namig (at last?) #2589702
    XN923
    Participant

    American aircraft bought by the British, at least Naval ones, have dreadful names. Vought Chesapeake?? Curtiss Cleveland??? Grumman Tarpon???? Brewster Bermuda?????

    By that record it should be named after a place with tenuous British and American connections, or a dodgy fish name. How about The McDonnell-BAe Cod, Birmingham, Sardine, Harwich, Tuna, or Whitebait?

    On a more serious note, I like Fury, acceptable because there was a North American Fury as well as the Hawker variety. For British service I would like to see that or perhaps Firefly.

    in reply to: Yet more Biggin Hill #466755
    XN923
    Participant

    Nice work, Matt.

    That shot of Ferocious Frankie(?) low down reminds me of Empire of the Sun somewhat…

    Thanks. I did feel the need to yell ‘P51! Cadillac of the Skies! a bit…

    It is ‘Frankie’ by the way.

    I think this was after the ‘airfield strafing run’ with the pyrotechnics – I decided to down-Canon and just watch this one, as I had totally missed Sally B’s bombing run by trying to get aircraft and bomb bursts in picture and missing both!

    in reply to: La Ferte Alais, Saturday – Part 1 #466762
    XN923
    Participant

    What’s no.1?

    Is no.5 a H(arvard)ellcat??

    in reply to: FLYING LEGENDS 2006 #1254754
    XN923
    Participant

    forget legends. Autem airshow 8 october: last EVER Belgian AF Fouga Magister Cm170 display! We are the last military operators of the type in Europe, so a unique chance to see it one last time.

    I was privileged to see this at Biggin Hill this year. I remember looking to see the Magister approaching me down the runway and thinking ‘that’s a fast taxi’ and then realising the undercarriage was up!

    I’d like to see a Blackburn Skua, Vultee Vengeance and Junkers Ju87 compete in a dive-bombing competition.

    I’d also like to see Simon’s Sircus and the Last Last Lightning Show, as well as a return to the days of jets beginning their displays with a supersonic dive aimed to ‘plant’ the sonic booms on the crowd line.

    I’ll settle for a lot of really good warbirds, expertly displayed though.

    in reply to: Javelin vs Sea Vixen #1254763
    XN923
    Participant

    I also love the sea vixen. Shame the only one flying isnt in period colours, but at least shes flying![IMG]

    Ah, who cares??

    http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h94/XN923/CNV00011.jpg

    in reply to: Javelin vs Sea Vixen #1254767
    XN923
    Participant

    Hi Flanker Man,

    Here is a link to a couple of photos of my Sea Javelin.

    http://www.airwarfareforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=5740

    Alex

    Nice. I agree with what the other poster said about finding a carrier big enough to land a Javelin… and with big enough hangers and lifts as well. But that would be an awesome spectacle.

    I reckon the nose oleo would have needed to be lengthened, and a bumper put under the tail – I think these would have been catapulted at very high alpha!

    in reply to: Yet more Biggin Hill #466944
    XN923
    Participant

    Thanks Propstrike. I’d noticed the graininess and was wondering what to do about it. I’m using a Canon EOS 500 but the longest lens I own is a 135mm so was using a borrowed 300mm. Got very little idea about settings I’m afraid.

    I was reasonably happy with the composition though seeing as it was the first time I’ve brought my camera to an airshow. DamienB’s pics of the same event are so good they make you weep!

    in reply to: Biggin Hill Air Fair #1255622
    XN923
    Participant

    Can anyone say what the Popham AN-2 was doing there?

    I drive past it on the way to work and nearly swerved into the central reservation when I saw it was missing on Friday!

    As far as I know it’s the first time it’s moved all year.

    John

    To quote Douglas Adams, it was ‘hanging in the air the way bricks don’t’.

    Quite some display actually. Very slow speed stuff, and even a couple of hairy looking stall-turns!

    in reply to: Javelin vs Sea Vixen #1255645
    XN923
    Participant

    There was certainly a wooden mockup of the Hawker P.1121, a development of the P.1103 at Kingston and that was cancelled by Duncan Sandys White Paper. The P.1103 had a more F-16esque appearance.

    Someone I know whos father worked on the design team at Glosters states that the thin-wing Javelin did have the horizontail tail… he remembers a model of it on their kitchen table as a boy all those year ago! However, as an engineer myself and knowing some of the shortcomings of the original Javelin, I can see obvious merits in deleting it!

    The P.1121 was a development of the P.1103 bringing it more into the strike role than pure interceptor as the Air Ministry had indicated to Hawker’s that this would be looked on favourably. It was all, strictly speaking anyway, private venture at this stage. It was even suggested that Hawker’s put forward the P.1121 for the TSR2 requirement, but again it was given fairly short shrift. Any chance the project had as an interceptor was killed by the Sandys-storm, but in reality the Air Ministry didn’t want it anyway.

    in reply to: Biggin Hill Air Fair #1255650
    XN923
    Participant

    Goodbye Ray

    http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h94/XN923/goodbye_ray.jpg

    🙁

    in reply to: Javelin vs Sea Vixen #1256034
    XN923
    Participant

    The ministry briefly flirted with the idea of buying an “Anglosied” Arrow but rapidly moved on to Spec F155T which spawned the Fairy Delta 3. This was then cancelled by D Sandy in 1957.

    According to Tony Buttler, Avro Canada were invited to submit the Arrow for F.155T but it did not meet the specification so did not proceed to the design conference. This gives an impression of just how radical the specification was, as the Arrow was already several notches above anything else then considered.

    Other more sensible designs that didn’t get beyond the initial stages of the competition were a larger, aera-ruled Lightning development and the Hawker P.1103 which was a Mach 2 interceptor-cum-strike fighter, as well as a second offering by Fairey which was a less radical development of the Delta 2. Any of these would, in my opinion, have kept up with the best in the world at the time.

    Following the ‘thin-wing Javelin’ discussions, I believe DH considered a thin-wing Sea Vixen as well, which would have had afterburning engines and true supersonic performance. Again, it was probably overtaken by events.

    in reply to: Javelin vs Sea Vixen #1257011
    XN923
    Participant

    I don’t believe there was a fly-off – the RAF seemed to favour the Javelin before either flew and the DH110 crash at the SBAC show put an end to any interest there might have been.

    No contest in my view – the Sea Vixen was a far more capable, long-lived and versatile machine. It looks like a big aircraft until you see a Javelin!

    It wasn’t a direct development of the Vampire/Venom by the way, but a clean sheet design, all-metal (unlike the previous, partly-wooden pair) and utilising swept wing research from the DH108 programme. The twin boom layout was retained partly because of DH’s mass of experience with this layout, and partly because it enable the two engines to be as close as possible to the centreline for good engine-out characteristics. In fact, the original DH110 was redesigned around 75% for the Mk20X which was the first true Sea Vixen prototype.

    in reply to: (Merged) Vulcan thread #1257020
    XN923
    Participant

    I’d promised myself I wasn’t going to read another Vulcan thread. I wish I had kept my promise.

    BTW how many Seafire threads are there active at the moment? Why not merge them?

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,083 total)