As Rommel was rumoured to have said at Tobruk….” give me a Platoon of Australians ,and I,ll take over the world..” :diablo: ……for all time,remember Gallipoli we will.
The number of Aussies there are in my office I thought he had done! 😮
XN923–
I concur with that. Further to it (though it likely doesn’t apply in the case of a B-17), such study affords the opportunity of “xeroxing” the design in great detail,
S.
You’d be surprised… there was a lot that came out of the FAAM Corsair ‘archaeology’ project that revealed a number of things that weren’t known about the build of this aircraft despite it being well documented… for example, the ‘spoiler’ on the starboard wing to encourage a predictable stall was found to be a factory addition rather than the ‘field mod’ it was assumed to be. Small things, but worth knowing. Even knowing the composition of the paint used, or the grease in the oleos is worth knowing.
The Vampire night fighter (originally a private venture for the export market) was in service before the Meteor as it was a relatively simple modification, and therefore the first British radar equipped jet fighter (as far as I know) but I imagine there were others earlier than that – the American ASH radar was so light and easily fitted to a range of aircraft I can’t imagine some early US jets didn’t have that specced.
Wasn,t it us Colonial ANZACS and Canadians who stopped the last German push in WW1:)and save the world??? 😀
Yes, no thanks to the arrogant British generals that discussed ways to send the Colonials to their deaths over tiffin from 100 miles behind the lines 😉
[QUOTE=J Boyle]
Looks very much like your average ‘America won every war’ movie. QUOTE]
As opposed to the British war movies, yeah there were a lot of Americans featured in the BoB, Dam Busters, Sink the Bismark, 633 Squadron, Reach for the Sky, One of our planes is Missing, etc., etc. :rolleyes:
This is a movie about an American unit for crying out loud. Sorry they didn’t add a few token Brits.
You sound like the guys who were complaining about no Brits in “Saving Private Ryan”…again…that was a film about an American unit. 😡 😀
As I recall the main character in 633 Squadron was American. BoB took place before America was in the war and featured Poles and Czechs as well as Brits, as well as a recognition at the end of the pilots from each country that gave their lives. Reach for the Sky was a biography. One of Our Planes is Missing was a propaganda film. Where were the Americans in the hunt for the Bismarck? Name me one???
The problem is not Americans making films about Americans. It is that non-American subjects get ignored. Saving Private Ryan was not just about an American Unit, it was about a theatre of war in which that American unit was fighting, yet it ignored the purpose of the campaign and viewed it only as some sort of nation-defining test of American manhood.
Worse, the films where other nationalities do get a look in usually serves to insult them. Nicholas Farrell’s squadron leader in Pearl Harbor was a hopeless desk jockey wishing he could have a few more Yanks on his squadron. Bill Murdoch in Titanic (criminally based on a real person) was a weak-minded authoritarian who shoots Italian immigrants and then himself because he can’t take the guilt (Lightoller just bellows that he is going to shoot the passengers ‘like dogs’). Looks like Jean Reno plays a sterotypical lazy Frenchman who can hardly be bothered to fight to save his country. As usual as soon as anyone complains, we’re Yank bashing, whining or crying into our pints. As has been pointed out in the Revisionism thread, you don’t have to change history to rewrite it, but can give a totally different impression by just ignoring big chunks of what did happen.
I agree with Mk 12.
We either rescue planes now or watch them eventually vanish.Hopefully, Swamp Ghost wil be restored to fly.
Otherwise I’m not sure if there is much difference between leaving it where it was and being a dusty museum exhibit.(Although I will also point out that what makes this AC special is that unlike most surviving Flying Fortresses this is an “E” with a combat history.)
I agree that valuable warbirds should be taken out of the ‘wild’ when they are being degraded by the elements, souvenir hunters and whatever else. However, I am more and more in favour of preservation rather than restoration, particularly when you have an aircraft with combat history. Restoration to fly necessarily rips out a lot of original material, and a lot of so called restoration in the past has destroyed original features that could teach us and future generations about the history of the aircraft and the type. Look at the recently released ‘KD431: Time Capsule Fighter’ about the FAA Museum’s Corsair for an example of just how much can be learned by keeping aircraft in their original condition. (Ironically, much of KD431’s originality was preserved under a layer of paint applied in the 60s to tart the aircraft up, but fortunately no-one had decided to take it back to the metal and do a ‘proper’ job).
[QUOTE=Fouga23]Papua New Guinea
You know what is sad about this is just how much material will be reused in the restoration?[/QOUTE]
who cares? As long as it’s restored!
…because then you might as well build a replica. It will probably cost less and take less time. This is a real aircaft with a real history, and heavy handed ‘restoration’ might end up getting rid of some of that. It needs to be preserved – that means no modern finishes or materials, no destroying original features to make it look shiny and new, and preferably just enough work to prevent further degradation. During the preservation process, masses can be learned about the history of the aircraft and the type that might not otherwise be recorded.
You find the funding and we will go make a a WW1 film about Mannock, Ball, Bishop, McCudden and anyone else you would like to include 😉
I wondered when someone was going to say that. I dare say this film wasn’t funded solely by enthusiasts. The Escadrille Lafayette deserves a film, but so do a lot of other subjects that don’t get a look in because the studios don’t think they will amuse 8 year olds in Idaho. (Or in Britain, everything that sconnor said).
Running along a Zeppelin? You can’t be serious.. :confused: Despite my harsh words I was actually quite looking forward to this until I heard that.
Now now! 😉
Sorry, one of those days.
[mutter]Why can’t we make a film about Mick Mannock, Billy Bishop, James McCudden anyway?[mutter]
Who is the council run by in Croydon?…..it’s usually Labour that have an obsession with building over anything, when the Conservatives used to try and turn down housing developments, Prescott would overrule them.
As for the White Hart, they have kept a token collection of pictures here and there but I don’t think the original bar layout has been there for years even before the refit a few years back.
I believe Conservative took control of Croydon from Labour at the recent local elections. Ultimately I doubt this will make much difference, both parties have proved pretty good at turning the South East into a giant car park.
Everywhere south of the Thames is prime territory for concreting over at the moment. I hope something can be done to save important buildings and sites like this until a generation comes along that can appreciate them. I don’t think hope will count for a lot though – it seems like a lot of the pub’s heritage has already been lost.
Oh ****, it’s produced by Dean Devlin!
We can look forward to America showing us all how to fly, inventing air combat, being the custodians of freedom and imposing sundry national holidays on the rest of us then. Great. Another extended advert for the Bush regime.
Not even a handful was built, never used operationally, relatively unknown
and, to be honest, not really a beauty !
Nevertheless, for me one of the most interesting post war transports,
the SNCAC NC.211 Cormoran.
Someone, who has a drawing/picture/artist’s impression, or something
like that of the pre-project, the even larger NC.210 ?
(picture from http://www.airwar.ru)
I think we’ve just found the C5 Galaxy’s daddy!
Apparently when the Beverley was due to make its first flight the staff at Brough had a bet to see whether it would get off the ground or not!
The Connie is lovely, but a bit too bendy looking for my liking. Britannia all the way!
Surely the Avro York deserves honourable mention?
Not forgetting

Connie best looking?

Nah.
(Before you go telling me it’s an airliner, the RAF and dozens of private operators used these for freight too)