As the Sergeant Pilots in the Battle of France were told that they didn’t need to know what was going on, or where they were going, just to follow the officers, and not given maps, you ‘aint that far off the mark.
Not unlike the Civil Service then 😀
The offices set up by Edward IV to administer the Kingdom are alive and kicking…
Don’t forget Dark Blue World, I’m sure there was a huge gothic mansion in the airfield there as well.
Perhaps the RAF is run along feudal lines.
Going back to the excerable Pearl Harbor and the aforementioned, admittedly impressive (the first time, after that it’s just gimmicky), shot of the bomb hitting the Arizona and a point of accuracy – the bomb that lands in the magazine looks to be no bigger than about 250lb – would it be possible for a little device like this to have plunged neatly through the armoured deck of a capital ship and into the heart of the most well protected part of the vessel?
One good reason to watch it, a few of the “real” stars of this movie……oh, and some actors.
By the way, has it always been standard practice to have a stately home at every RAF airfield?! The number of films and TV dramas I’ve seen where that seems to be the case I think it must be.
This is what/who I was doing whilst you were all watching that drivel…
The one on the left btw…
Hmm. 7/10
Alright ,so I’m “ploughing a lonely furrow” with this one, as I said it should be viewed as a film not an oportunity to remake a classic or an educational treatise ;
You misunderstand me. My chief complaint with Pearl Harbor is not that it is historically innaccurate (which it is) or recklessly misleading when it could have had some educational value (which it is) but that it is a really, really, gallbladder-achingly bad film.
And finally, on a point of logic, how did the dyslexic Rafe Mcawley manage to write all those flowery love letters to his girlfriend, in between scrapping with Messerschmitts?
Wouldn’t it have been hilarious if the voiceover had read the letters phonetically? 😀
i hate this film, there was potential for a remake or tora tora tora but instead they stick some stupid slushy love story in it!!! thank god desperte housewives was on !!
Of course, part of the reason the FX in Tora! Tora! Tora! were so good is that half of them were set-ups that went so badly wrong that real aircraft really crashed into other real aircraft (or at least mock-ups), there were genuine wheels-up landings and in several cases, the ‘ground crew’ seen ‘running for their lives’ from explosions and collisions were actually film crew running for their lives from explosions and collisions.
You can’t make a CGI Val run into a miniature P40 by mistake as far as I understand it.
And it’s not even a good slushy love story! The writers have got themselves in such a knot by the end that the audience is allowed to feel relieved that Josh Hartnet’s character (sorry, ‘character’) has died and removed any worry about future paternity suits and the unfortunate child growing up with ‘I have one mummy but two daddies’ stories at school.
Utterly virtue-free tosh.
Eagle has been quoted for TSR2 in a modelling Magazine. There may be some document somewhere with what idea’s BAC had.
I gather there is reasonably good circumstantial evidence for this, in that the RAF seemed to have an unofficial policy of naming strike aircraft after birds of prey in this era (Harrier, Hawk etc.) and there were some suggestions that the F-111 would have been called Merlin, as that bird folds its wings back before it attacks.
I suppose another thought may be that it would have been named ‘Thunder’ to go with its stablemate the ‘Lightning’, but English Electric was part of BAC by this stage.
Given that the TSR2 was never known by an unofficial name (as many aircraft tend to be before an official name is given) it is likely that any naming policy would have been in the very early stages if indeed it had been considered at all.
Well, I switched on the television at about nine and watched until the break for the news. Even cutting out the crappy love triangle stuff and getting to the nub of the action, this was a strangely empty experience. Watch! as darstadly ‘Jap Suckers’ (yes, I’m sure that’s what the Americans called them) machine gun nurses. Marvel! As the P40 synchro-pair team defeat droves of Zeroes. Applaud! as cartoon aircraft attack cartoon ships. Weep! As murdered American sailors float in the clear blue water next to a bullet-riddled stars’n’stripes.
Funniest was Cuba Gooding Jr. machine-gunning his own comrades (my wife: ‘Isn’t he shooting at the other ship and missing the planes by miles?’ The film ‘BOOOOM!!!!’) and possibly a close second was Michael Bay raiding the creative-piggy-bank of every director since Eisenstein (washed out colours and jumpy hand-held work straight from Saving Private Ryan, Slo-mo sequences lifted badly from Battleship Potemkin (or more likely The Untouchables), even cine-camera footage ripped off from The Blair Witch Project. And again, that music cranks in (Audience, you are now instructed to feel ). I could have vomited if I felt this abortion deserved the effort.
Get a grip you lot ! 😡 I’ve finally had it with slagging off the Hollywood films – I don’t see any clever cloggs in the UK making films about ww2 history !
I don’t see any Americans making films about Second World War history either…
ps. and who is re-making the Dambusters ? ? ? Not a Brit, that’s for sure.
Is David Frost not British then?
So I have chew the pillow and try not to scream
Is that before or during?
I thought he was fat?
He used to be, but lost an awful lot of weight after finishing LOTR. He looks nothing like himself these days.
Botha
Indeed, ‘allegedly’. It’s one of those quotes that’s been attributed to a number of similar aircraft over the years. A dreadful aircraft anyway one cuts it.
Interestingly, Putnam’s ‘Blackburn Aircraft Since 1919’ makes no reference of the dreadful nature of the Botha, but devotes considerable space to the controversy over the pronounciation of the name and mutters darkly about how Blackburn’s could not get hold of any Bristol Taurus engines because Bristol nicked them all for the Beaufort.
Is it time for a ‘too bad to be forgotten’ thread? Or perhaps a ‘really bad Blackburn aircraft’ thread?
You’re not being pedantic, but I don’t think I can help you on that, unless I am misinterpretting your comment. I’m not sure what you mean by the cord, but if it’s built into the model then it’s a no go or an email to Bill Holker, who originally built it. I just handle the textures 🙂
It would be built into the model – the bit of wing between the fuselage and the nacelle was extended forward and aft on the PR9. There are some photos around (from above or below) that show it quite well.
Otherwise, some fantastic models there.
Well at least there is one left and it will be looked after for generations to come
Sadly unrepresentative of the production model, but at least its better than the surviving Blackburn Firebrand (or lack thereof).
I’ve seen pictures of the FAAM example painted in a spurious scheme of Extra Dark Sea Grey/Sky which no TF1 ever carried while being tested, so the FAAM restored this example to the original bare metal. Although some examples of this type carried roundels and serials, they were all unpainted.
Oooo. Really?
That’s a wide open topic. How about the DH-9A or Brisfit for two earlier ‘multi-role combat aircraft’?
Or indeed, Martinsyde Elephant (I didn’t say effective MRCA…)
For overlooked and unloved (but where would we have been without them?) types I would say Blackburn Skua (James wouldn’t be at all surprised to hear me say that), Fairey Barracuda, Gloster Gladiator…