dark light

XN923

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,051 through 1,065 (of 1,083 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Kiwi Resins – a great range of new kits #232033
    XN923
    Participant

    Some nice looking models there… Nice to see a Percival Mew Gull in the ‘coming soon’ section, will make me feel better about not forking out for that super expensive, limited run kit that came out a little while ago.

    in reply to: Weathering #232034
    XN923
    Participant

    See http://www.swannysmodels.com/Weathering.html

    The stuff on washes is pretty good. Try Tamiya ‘smoke’ acrylic paint, thinned and brushed on then dabbed off with kitchen towel. The trick is to emphasise the panel lines without making the model look like someone’s smeared oil all over it.

    Really, it’s all about experience, but it frustrates me when the modelling magazines blithley say ‘I then weathered the exterior’ without giving frustrated novices any idea how they achieved the fantastically lifelike exhaust stains, paint chips and so on.

    One tip I have heard but not yet tried is to use pastels – grind conte crayons (apparently it has to be conte) into powder and brush on. You can then brush as much as you want back off again depending on how dirty you want the model to be, then seal with a coat of Johnson’s ‘Klear’ floor polish.

    in reply to: Artwork on box lids #232165
    XN923
    Participant

    There was a book of the ‘coffee table’ variety published a couple of years ago with Airfix box art. See http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1840373261/ref=si_1_3/202-7479161-2175803

    in reply to: Matchbox hobby kits #232166
    XN923
    Participant

    Modelcraft have reissued the Matchbox Twin Otter, so I’m not surprised they are doing the Stranraer. I think they are Canadian, so anything that served in Canada should sell well.

    This makes sense. They also have a Firefly which I have built – nice model, when the rest of the parts arrive. It’s odd, almost like a vacform – they give you the shape of the aircraft and the rest is up to you. According to the UK distributors, they have a couple of their own toolings and the rest of the range is reissue. I think there are lots of Frog/Novo kits – the artwork on the Swordfish box looks like a bad scan of the Novo box top!

    in reply to: What's your earliest memories of Airfix? #232168
    XN923
    Participant

    The Airfix MkIX Spitfire. My Dad had dug the Spit he had built as a lad out of a box where it had been since him and my Mum moved into that house. The undercart was broken off and it was covered in dust. I was totally captivated. It was the most beautiful thing I had ever seen. I had heard people talking about Spitfires before but had no inkling what they really were – at that age I only had indistinct ideas of what aeroplanes were, but from then on I was a commited aviation-phile.

    I bought the same kit recently. I’m well aware of the panning this kit gets from the model mafia, and I know it’s the wrong shape, and that it’s clunky and the fit is poor compared to modern efforts, and that you can get a better and cheaper model elsewhere, but it’s not the same. The Airfix MkIX Spitfire is one of the clearest pre school memories I have, and started me off on a path I have been on ever since. It made me interested in history, it led me to learn about the brave men who defended this country while they ‘danced the skies on laughter silvered wings’. It gave me something other than television to be fascinated with. It helped create the person I am now (for better or worse!). It will be a sad day for me when the kit is finally deleted and the moulds pensioned off.

    in reply to: Matchbox hobby kits #232183
    XN923
    Participant

    I have heard that Modelcraft are issuing a couple of new kits, including a Stranraer and the rumour is that this is likely to be the Matchbox re-issued. The prevailing view seems to be that the Stranraer was one of Matchbox’ best kits and even bears comparison with today’s offerings.

    in reply to: "Airline" TV Series (2005 zombie thread) #1405824
    XN923
    Participant

    I seem to remember there was a novel as well – I read my Dad’s copy after seeing a couple of episodes of the TV series. Does anyone know if this was a ‘novelisation’ of the TV series or whether it bore more relation to the original scripts? It was written by Greatorex, so I suspect the latter…

    in reply to: Buccaneer Pics #1406383
    XN923
    Participant

    I have just been reading about Buccaneers taking part in Red Flag exercises ( you can keep your putnams. my latest book cost 20p in a charity shop). Anyway the book mentions a desert camoflage scheme but only shows a black and white picture. Does anybody have a colour pic of this scheme.

    The colour scheme is reproduced in the Ad Hoc publications Aeroguide 30 on the Buccaneer. It can also be seen by clicking on the link I gave earlier, i.e. http://www.blackburn-buccaneer.co.uk/0_Contents.html – the model artwork for the Czechmaster Resin Bucc shows this on the lower right.

    The scheme was applied using a supposedly removeable acrylic paint, which had a habit of baking onto the aircraft’s normal paint job when exposed to too much heat – hence the camoflage being left in the normal RAF green and grey behind the jet exhausts. However, the hot Nevada sun did the same to the paint so when the aircraft came back to the UK, they could not get the paint off too easily. As the same aircraft were due to take part in an ‘arctic’ exercise, the stone/earth was painted over with white/grey wraparound scheme. This is an even rarer paint job to see pictures of, but is quite striking.

    in reply to: Buccaneer Pics #1406617
    XN923
    Participant

    Gatwick Bucc

    Some details here of XN923, Gatwick’s Buccaneer and currently the only running S.1 – the first shot is of the first time she was run up at Gatwick, and no doubt endangered a few eyebrows in so doing!

    By the way, for those of you of a modelling bent, a new 1/72 resin model is coming out soon and will cover every variant in staged releases – see http://www.blackburn-buccaneer.co.uk/0_Contents.html

    in reply to: Duxford's Autumn Airshow through Jamie's camera #477859
    XN923
    Participant

    In terms of that second to last shot, I’ll have a look – I’ve probably made a mistake w/ the filenames, I usually do :p

    Jamie.

    As I said, sorry to be picky but I know how annoyed I’d be if I found out I had something labelled wrong ages later, at least now you’ll probably be able to find out what Spit it is.

    BTW I see you come from Walton on the Naze – I used to live down that way and went to school just down the road at Tendring High School (as was). Small world…

    in reply to: Duxford's Autumn Airshow through Jamie's camera #478031
    XN923
    Participant

    Great photos. BTW I hate to be picky but the second last shot is labelled as Mk IX MH434 – it isn’t. I thought it might be better to point it out while you still had a chance of identifying the aircraft. MH434 is indeed a MkIX, but this pic is of a later, Griffon engined mark – possibly an MkXIVe or F22.

    They are nice shots though, thanks for sharing.

    in reply to: Battle on Britain DVD in N.A. #1412702
    XN923
    Participant

    Ah, the dangers of anecdotal knowledge.

    Those are some good pictures. Interesting the pic of the Spit with the 5 bladed prop – watching the film again I was impressed with how well the Spitfires in the foreground all looked like MkIs and IIAs – presumably lots of MkVs with the cannon removed? Normally in productions much after the war there are lots of MkIXs and the like thrown in, but in BofB they successfully seem to ‘trick’ the later marks so they add to the action but not so you would know they weren’t the right model.

    Don’t know if anyone can help with this, but in the sequence where the Polish training squadron ignores orders and goes into action, the foreground shows three Hurricanes in ‘vic’ formation with other vics behind. In some shots these ‘extra’ aircraft look like Spitfires – but in other shots they look like Buchons… This would make sense as the Buchon is closer in shape to a Hurricane than a Spitfire is, but can anyone confirm which it is? Or is it both? Were there RAF-liveried Buchons used in BofB?

    in reply to: RR Merlin or Radial . . . #1413173
    XN923
    Participant

    Anything big and heavy with pistons is glorious, but I think on balance I’d go for a vee – perversely, I like the RR Griffon sound. A real, rasping roar. Could still listen to Merlins all day though, in whatever airframe you care to mention.

    in reply to: Battle on Britain DVD in N.A. #1413313
    XN923
    Participant

    Particularly pleasing for me is the inclusion of the score by Sir William Walton, who as I recall was commissioned to write the score but in the end only one piece was used, which I think was called ‘the battle in the skies’ and provided the superbly chilling soundtrack to the frenetic September the 15th sequence. After watching the film last night with the original score, I stuck the beginning on again, this time with the Walton score – very different in tone to the original (I forget the name of the guy who wrote it, who also did the Dam Busters and 633 Squadron – I want to say Percy Granger but I don’t think it’s him…) and almost like watching a totally different film. I’ll get round to watching the whole thing with the restored Walton score… well, the next time my wife is away.

    in reply to: Adelaide's MkVc and a Question #1422684
    XN923
    Participant

    Anecdotally mind, as far as I am aware, the move to ‘bubble top’ canopies was all about visibility. After a while, designers started to take notice of pilots who had always said that for dogfights, you need excellent all-round vision.

    Not sure quite what sparked the move with the Spitfire, but Westland did all the work on converting existing marks like the XIV and XVI to bubbletop configuration, and the tests were obviously so successful that most later mark Spits were designed and built this way. I really don’t know if it provides an aerodynamic advantage or disadvantage. Aerodynamics 101 suggests that anything sticking into the airflow should be tapered away as much as possible to allow the air to ‘close up’ around the obstruction therefore losing as little energy as possible. In reality I suspect it’s more complicated than this.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,051 through 1,065 (of 1,083 total)