dark light

jackjack

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 1,733 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2376643
    jackjack
    Participant

    Cola I don’t disagree with you, the F/a-18 isn’t getting through the trans sonic region quicker than a F-16 imo. I have heard before that in the sub sonic region that the Hornet has better acceleration but the pilot in the link you provided doesn’t seem to support that. The wing sweep of the Hornet doesn’t allow it to pull through the trans sonic region because its much draggier, even if it has similar thrust to weight.

    even using cola’s link, the hornet seems the better dogfighter and the super hornet is even better

    also he was running the old FCC with 35 deg aoa roll and not the ‘very’ updated 55 deg aoa roll, as per my link to the fcc update
    even so….on page 5 of his link

    SLOW-SPEED CHARACTERISTICS

    There’s no better performing fighter in the close-in, slow speed, knife-in-the-teeth dogfight than the F/A-18 Hornet, except maybe, of course, a Super Hornet. But that’s another story.

    The Hornet flies very comfortably at AoAs of up to 50 degrees and has great pitch, roll and yaw authority between 25 degrees of AoA and the lift limit of 35 degrees of AoA. Most crowds are amazed when the Blue Angels perform the Hornet low-speed pass, which is around 120 knots and only 25 degrees of AoA.
    There are no nasty departures to worry about, and if the pilot happens to lose control, the best recovery procedure is to grab the towel racks (two handgrips on the canopy bow used during cat shots).
    On the other hand, a Viper has a 25-degree AoA limiter built into its software, and even fewer degrees of AoA are available if it’s carrying air-to-ground goodies on the hard points. Up against the limiter, the nose stops tracking; in that case, it’s time to drop the hammer and use the big motor to get the knots back, which by the way, happens in a hurry.

    The Hornet, however, will stand on its tail, hold 100 knots and 35-degrees AoA and swap ends in a maneuver called “the Pirouette,” which looks like a jet fighter doing a hammerhead with a quarter roll. To the spectator and the participant, it looks and feels impossible. the Hornet gets slower (high-energy bleed rate) quicker than anything I’ve flown, and it gets faster (low acceleration performance) slower than anything I’ve flown.

    In a Hornet, it’s difficult not to get the first shot in a close-in dog-fight that starts from a perfectly neutral merge (going opposite directions at the same altitude). My Viper buddies tell me there is very little room for error when they fight the Hornet. The best way to handle the situation is to get the Hornet to slow down, while they maintain energy so the Viper’s superior thrust-to-weight will out-zoom the Hornet and then they can shoot at it from above. As a Hornet driver, I have never lost to a Viper guy that I saw, but I have run into Viper drivers that said the same thing about their jet.

    in reply to: UK to ditch F35B for Super Hornet? #2376689
    jackjack
    Participant

    MSphere
    only untill any phoon exports etc are finalised, italy and UK already have their phoons up for sale
    it wont be day 1 into the future

    in reply to: UK to ditch F35B for Super Hornet? #2376699
    jackjack
    Participant

    uk wont get the SH the 35b will be
    as to this price nonsense, the ordered UK 2011 lrip 35b is 130m usd, the production one will be around 100m
    the 35a will be around 80m usd
    i dont see the phoon as a future day one platform

    in reply to: UK to ditch F35B for Super Hornet? #2376720
    jackjack
    Participant

    no, its just speculation on my part
    the phoon will be a day 2 striker with f-35a + b taking the lead roll and also as a uav control hub

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2376723
    jackjack
    Participant

    its up to you to support your claim which obviously you cant, why should i google

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2376730
    jackjack
    Participant

    Why it doesn’t surprise me that they didn’t include any real figures or hard facts, just marketing charts full of BS which can be interpreted in any thinkable way.. :rolleyes:

    why would LM who are still selling f-16’s put up info that the boeing fa18c is better, as a marketing ploy ?
    your logic escapes me, but this isnt the first time

    in reply to: UK to ditch F35B for Super Hornet? #2376745
    jackjack
    Participant

    Sorry JackJack the RAF will not get both the F-35A and the F-35B as the current head of the RAF has stated more than once that the RAF cannot afford to support the logistics of more than two types of fast jet, and while the A and B do have a high level of commonality there will be some differences. While I agree with your sentiment, the RAF could not afford to operate four types of fast jets and are struggling to operate three types of fast jets currently and things are only going to get worse.

    so you think they might get rid of the phoon altogether ?
    i think they will put in a significant f-35a order when the phoon contracts and exports are sorted, which politically and financially cant be done now

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2376775
    jackjack
    Participant

    JJ, again…

    1) F18C DOESN’T have better transonic acc. than F16, as per link.

    2) F18C or F16C, DON’T have higher instantaneous g load limit then each other, but both have the same – 9, as per link.

    What are you talking about??

    You obviously missed the point of this link.
    It’s here to provide cross reference with another link, that contains F16’s and F18’s comparative accelerations, in case there’s a doubt in validity of claims.

    Personal insult removed by moderator.
    your dassault statistic link said
    Combat Maneuverability Instantaneous turn rate @ 15,000 ft. (4,572m) – Two IR Missiles – 50% Int. Fuel
    Mach 0.7 °/sec
    f-16c 18
    f-a18c 18.5
    (dassault may have it wrong °/sec or g , as per my following picture)

    your dassault link didnt measure transonic acceleration, 1.6-7 is supersonic
    your second link gave the transonic acceleration of the fa18c
    the F/A-18C accelerates from 0.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach in 34.6 seconds, but didnt give the f-16
    that is why i asked for a link to the f-16 transonic acceleration

    also can you give the sustained for the f-16 ?
    At sea level, the F/A-18C’s sustained turn rate is 19.2 degrees per second,
    At 15,000 feet, the F/A-18C’s sustained turn rate is 12.3 degrees per second,

    this has it about the same trans acc, better sustained and less instantaneous
    g= longer better
    accel= shorter better
    http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/4146/image4u.jpg

    in reply to: UK to ditch F35B for Super Hornet? #2376847
    jackjack
    Participant

    what nonsense, UK will get f-35b
    down the track will get f-35a as well, the typhoon becomes a day 2 striker i predict

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2376851
    jackjack
    Participant

    cola, your links dont say what you claim, but thank you for them
    i dont think you read it properly as i said the f-16 not the f-18 had better instantaneous g, i was wrong and you were accidentally right
    they do show one mistake i made, under m.7 where dogfights happen, the fa18 has better instantaneous g too

    perhaps a video would be better for you
    http://www.patricksaviation.com/videos/Guest/249/

    if you could post your links showing the f-16 has better transonic acceleration, i would appreciate it
    • At 5,000 feet at maximum thrust, the F/A-18C accelerates from 0.8 Mach to 1.08 Mach7 in 21 seconds,
    • At 20,000 feet at maximum thrust, the F/A-18C accelerates from 0.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach in 34.6 seconds,
    • At 35,000 feet at maximum thrust, the F/A-18C accelerates from 0.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach in 55.80 seconds,

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2377091
    jackjack
    Participant

    JJ, FCS doesn’t alter performance (well, it does if the original was downloaded from Inet) but handling, whether those are measured in climb, level flight, dive, or in turn…doesn’t matter.
    I was talking about performance issues, since some guys managed to conclude (in their infinite wisdom) that F16 and F18 have “practically” the same performance.

    why dont you put a bit of reality in your posts now and then ?
    the fa18c has better transonic acceleration and sustained g than the f-16
    the fa18c post 2004 has a much superior maneuverability envelope
    the f16 has better instantaneous g than the fa18

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2377095
    jackjack
    Participant

    jessmo
    they wont get it till saab, dassault and eurofighter consortium brings out a gen 5 production…. LOL

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2377107
    jackjack
    Participant

    flying in a straight line performance still stands
    any manoeuvrings doesnt still stand and in fact falls over, it was a very significant upgrade, which in truth should have had the money spent to be done earlier

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2377286
    jackjack
    Participant

    i agree, their upgrades have to be taken into account ?

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2377339
    jackjack
    Participant

    A comparison of F16 and F18, from a pilot’s point of view.

    except that as you fully know and have been told, it is pointless judging the fa-18 with the old FCS, pre 2003/4

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 1,733 total)