ok, going by your point, f-35 has better than f-22 because the f-22 has to use TVC
i doubt the f-22 uses TVC other than takeoff and high alt supersonic, but the vids will show if i’m wrong, i havent looked and someone would know
well DACT will be fun for the fanboys when the f-35 slaps the phoon in a dogfight
i read it has the same envelope/performance as the f-22 up to supersonic
i’ve used TMor as a source (its only passive and AC that gets his eyes to glaze over :eek:)
why wouldnt i use someone from AD ?
the sensible thing could be to ask usa for their f414 / ~9.8 ton to use for uae, rafale used the f404 / ~7.9 ton before, so it fits
yes, its all a con, the major air forces and goverments of a ~dozen countries havent got a clue what they are doing
should we make a list of those that have chosen the f-35 over the phoon ?
There is a reason why the jet is called F/A-18 and not F-18. Now return to your laugh.
now i know why they called it the F-35, thanks 😎
you dont really want me to go and get quotes on whether A&C is taken as absolute and they wait for a second source, that i have read from blogs and forums
you know how hard it is for me to google in french and find them again 😮
no its not called the Joint STRIKE Aircraft, its called the JSF Joint Strike Fighter
you want to change it to JSB joint strike bomber and they should have called it the B-35
yes, there are some good posters on french forums, you get none of the nonsense you get here
not all the french are deaf dumb and blind 😀
ps, the A&C that is often quoted here is considered a weekly rag and taken at face value and isnt taken as seriously as a source
its just a passing fad, them new fangle horseless-carrages will never be as good as my dear old bess
the problem is that the air inlets won’t allow sufficient airflow for 9t thrust, so, if you want a beefier engine, you need to redo the inlets on the airframe.
the thrust doesn’t come out of nowehere… you need to feed the engine somehow 😉
i read that the air flow of the current inlets will sustain 8.3 ton, so thats half of the increase and perhaps is a good compromise if that can be achieved within the dimensions and weight of the current m88
ok, i guess everything is relative. i didnt mean ancient
do you think it would be better to spend the money on redesigning the m88 to the same weight and dimensions and as much power as the air intake will manage, i think 8.3
or spend a lot on the frame to take the other .7 for the 9ton
or do a total design of a new engine
if the frame and they bring the 2020 composite change forward that may kill 2 birds in one
Heard about the new 9ton class M88 being proposed for the UAE purchase and the proposed UAE Rafale’s strike configuration of three SCALP, one under each wing and one under fuselage. Sounds optimistic.
i find it doubtful it will proceed, the added weight and engine length changes the center of gravity and it needs a new airtake system
this may not sound like a big deal but it is a basic redesign, as a new plane would and full testing program would have to be undertaken
as the m88 is an old design, it would be easier and better to design an entirely new engine with the modern tech to work within the constraints of the frame
there was also talk with india as to engine development, so a new engine may have export potential
there is a discussion here about it
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.air-defense.net/forum/index.php%3FPHPSESSID%3Dd3t2bn7dq2sqjhch6s746kf4k1%26board%3D9.0&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dair%2Bdefense%2Bnet%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DtD5&rurl=translate.google.com
the engine upgrade has been available for years, the navy has never wanted it, i guess we have to question why others think they need it and they dont
the f-35 is the priority, but usa wouldnt put the entire carrier operation at risk for the sake of an engine upgrade, it just doesnt make sense
the only conclusion i have is that the SH is doing the job they want it to, they spent the money on aesa quick enough
issue of AW&ST (July 5) says that Navy is NOT showing interest in the upgraded F-414 engine w/ a 20% increase in total thrust. Sales of the new engine will be aimed at the export market
looks like the usa wont have the best SH airshow
its all in fun and banter
i agree, its a systems event, its not the platform, its how well it works in your system
but thats too much reality and well above our ability to discuss 😀
aussies were initially offered the f-22 in ~2002 , we declined because it didnt fit our system
@TMor
well done, its a good idea to help when someone has the wrong end of the stick