dark light

jackjack

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 1,733 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2398047
    jackjack
    Participant

    jackjack :

    I already explained it to you :

    “”it only has an airframe and a FBW enabling it to point its nose even during negative speed (and without TVC) . “”

    Cheers .

    no i’m calling BS on that, i’m going to need a creditable link to show the rafale can maneuver while going backwards in the brief lift to 100 aoa wiping off all speed

    in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2398078
    jackjack
    Participant

    if ever the french do sell their plane to the likes of libia, the rafale has to be considered in potential threats

    in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2398089
    jackjack
    Participant

    Hornets were not able to give their competitors a run even at the time of their creation. They were primarily designed as solid A-G performers and their ability to shoot down other aircraft is far from stellar. Let alone from point blank range..

    originally the old hornet had a fcs of 35 deg aoa roll and average radar
    did you hear about the mid life upgrade ?
    i think you should google the raaf hornets and see their kit

    ps, i wont even talk about our sh and growlers that are going to be delivered

    in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2398098
    jackjack
    Participant

    The Rafale is never falling , it only has an airframe and a FBW enabling it to point its nose even during negative speed (and without TVC) .

    Cheers .

    classic BW LOL
    would you like to tell me how this works, so it wasnt falling, it must be true, the french do have a reverse gear in their planes

    in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2398119
    jackjack
    Participant

    Have a look at this :
    http://rafale.freeforums.org/post47.html#p47

    i wouldnt expect anything less from a professional pilot talking about a guest
    the ability to point its nose ?, 30 deg vs 55 deg aoa for the old hornet tells me something, doesnt it
    again not that its needed it wont get into a wvr as the bvr abilities will do the job

    in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2398138
    jackjack
    Participant

    The Rafale is indeed more agile, because even despite the F-18C is lighter than the F-18E, it has a smaller wing, the F-18E is much heavier basicly both aircraft are underpowered but retain the basic STR of 18 deg/s which indeed is better than both the F-15E and F-14 but is not as good as Rafale at this moment the Rafale is among the 5 more agile fighters surpassing legacy F-15. F-16s, F-18s, MiG-29s and Su-27s .
    The Only fighters in its league are probably the Su-35BM, Eurofighter and MiG-35 and superior only the F-22 and T-50
    The secret weapon of the F-18E is the AIM-9X and its HMD/S which basicly will equalize any superior agility.

    yes, the rafale nay be more agile but so would those redbull air race planes
    the sh has better radar, better weapons and has better sa in the system battlespace
    heck even our old 25 yr hornets will give the rafale a run for its money

    the rafale has poor radar and a2a missiles in comparison, come back and tell me in 2014 when the rafale has been updated and then you may have some points

    in reply to: Stealth features , RAM , etc … #2398358
    jackjack
    Participant

    hang on, i’ll go ask my mum, she was friendly with the usa airforce

    are ya gunna tell me about the 1/2 cm of ram on the rafale probe that you can see at the base again ?

    in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2398362
    jackjack
    Participant

    got a link to it waxing the sh ? i havent heard this one
    roe on the f-15 would be nice too, hms and such should have done the job
    the euro18, what version fcs system did they have and did they have hms too ?

    rafale was briefly raised to 100 ° with a speed of -40 knots
    should we make a list of plane who can do this and probable not write off that amount of speed

    -40kts…i heard rumors the rafale had a reverse gear or was it just falling out of the sky ?

    in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2398414
    jackjack
    Participant

    there are 2 proposals that give it 20-30% more power, but the navy is happy with it as it is, it seems more power isnt their needed goal

    in reply to: Taranis aloft? #2398439
    jackjack
    Participant

    normally they trial for 12 mths before stuff starts getting reported and thats a nears completion one, then ya have the black trials we never hear about

    ok seems it was ground testing here last year with flights this year

    U.K. Launch Project Taranis, UCAV Technology Demonstrator
    Ground testing of Taranis are scheduled for in early 2009, at BAE Systems test facility at Woomera, Australia. The first flight trials taking place in 2010. …
    defense-update.com/products/t/taranis-ucav.htm

    in reply to: Taranis aloft? #2398453
    jackjack
    Participant

    it was/is down in aussie land doing trials

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2398698
    jackjack
    Participant

    If this is so, against all other previous expectations I think the Rafale offer may have been given it’s “kiss of death”…

    Hammer

    as a novice without an aussie national interest in this decision
    i think brazil shouldnt really care what the plane is, its the ‘tech transfer’ for their industry thats important and i dont really know what that plane/nation is
    as a plane, i think gripen is a good option for future sales
    fa-18 for ability, but brazil would need to have better systems to use this ability
    the rafale for non us embargo possibility, but if thats the case brazil is doing stuff that is going to side line it from a lot of countries and they would be leaning to russia china france for support
    france has shown with non supply of missiles to agentina and sided with uk, brazil wont get a free run on its no embargo plan with them also

    in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2398701
    jackjack
    Participant

    :confused::confused::confused:
    Su-27 series roll rate should be 270°/s, which is the most in all contem. a/c.
    Euro canards should be higher because of delta wing.

    ok, i’ll try to be clearer, a controlled roll at degree of aoa
    with the ability to roll
    the euro canards have an aoa about 30 deg aoa
    the su xx about 30 deg aoa, but i’d have to google it
    fa-18 about 45 deg aoa
    fa-18sh, about 50 deg aoa
    the f-35 about 50 deg aoa
    the f-22 about 60deg aoa
    the sr-71 isnt 45 its actually quite low, under 20 deg aoa

    in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2398897
    jackjack
    Participant

    with the ability to roll
    the euro canards have an aoa about 30
    the su xx about 30
    fa-18 about 45
    fa-18sh, about 50
    the f-35 about 50
    the f-22 about 60
    the sr-71 isnt 45 its actually quite low, under 20

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2399008
    jackjack
    Participant

    And, before you say “active stealth doesn’t work yet”, remember that th F-35 does neither 😉

    who said the french term as in gov documents translated as ‘active stealth’ doesnt work and no they didnt say ‘active cancellation’ but i would be happy for you to show me i’m mistaken

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 1,733 total)