now now my little friend, i cant help what you dont know and what you post
US ? if you meant invers, chances are you’re my neighbour
Again invers invers SAR detect the hole of silence. Againts the Babinet’s principle is RAM and RAS useless and the Babinet’s principle is for interest at rocket guiding and AASR. 😉
its ok, if you mean inverse sar, i just worked out you dont know and just make it up as you go
RAM can’t absorb all RF. Should RAM can do the complet stealth job you need no F-117, F-22 and F-35. Then must you only paint all your fighters with RAM and it’s stealth. O, I forget RAM is expensiv and not really long time reliable and not fild repairable.
“The $2 Billion Stealth Bomber Can’t Go Out in the Rain“
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/08/23/world/the-2-billion-stealth-bomber-can-t-go-out-in-the-rain.html
1997…are you trolling or is it simply you dont know ?
if you dont know i suggest you google, if trolling heck why not use it
i cant believe you’re suggesting an aussie journalist has made a careless mistake
its a simple question which you (and Princess Jackajck) can’t address because it would make you wrong.
Cheers
it seems you still have a reading comprehension problem
March 30, 2010
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/australia-working-on-jets-payments-20100330-r9oe.html
“””The federal government will purchase up to 100 of the aircraft – with the first entering service in 2018 – at a price tag of $75 million each, in 08 tyaud
Australia was not paying its full share of development costs”””
we paid 144 mil usd for our share of R&D, [much reduced to real cost]
our buy price is A$75mil
so tell me again why aussies would be so much better buying phoons
from jj’s last post :
‘i’m old and my memory of them is fading’
That explains a lot, LOL.:rolleyes:
well help an old man out 😀 repost the rafale and f-22 vids so we can talk and see again how the rafale will wipe the floor with it
yes it seems to be a common public term but it doesnt actually block radar, it signal manages radar through several techs, as radar cant be blocked
None that I am aware of, not that my quote had anything to do with RAAF acquisition of Growlers. I was pointing out how not so great Growler is replacing it’s predecessor in the USN. I do believe you were comparing RAAF potential Growlers to be with the USN acquisition of Growler. I was pointing out the loss of coverage with their ratio.
you are looking at a direct platform to platform replacement and frankly i think you’re selling the growler short, but no matter
it doesnt work like this as its a ‘total systems event’ and how each piece works within that system
the EF-111 and EA-6B doesnt fit anymore and the ‘system’ has moved on
The defence minister in Australia has announced that Australia will buy 207 JSF’s for $105M each at the price quoted by JackJack and sell 100 of them back to the US at just under the real price of $200M so the US get the benefit to help pay for much overdue heath reforms.
The treasury is looking into buying 100 per year to sell back to our closest allie, and the issue of source code now isn’t important as the US have it already…
Well I guess I was wrong about the JSF all along.:eek:
it seems you still haave a reading comprehension problem
i have said this before for you to read between the lines without stating it directly but its good that it has been publicly disclosed
“””The federal government will purchase up to 100 of the aircraft – with the first entering service in 2018 – at a price tag of $75 million each [in 2008 then yr $]
Australia was not paying its full share of development costs”””
we paid 144 mil usd for our share of R&D, [much reduced to real cost]
our buy price is A$75mil
there are advantages in being america’s bbitch, this is but one example, to upset you even more there are better examples :diablo:
so tell me again why aussies would be so much better buying phoons
Bill is at it again:
8% increase in range with 30% increase in fuel by using external tanks is … not really impressive, to say the least. Are those numbers correct?
Perhaps Jwcook is right; perhaps this is the Jack(jack) of all trades, master of none? 🙂
well if bill said its bad, its time to scrap the f-35, a lot of countries ask him what plane they should buy, it must be a nice earner for him in his spare time
so thats the reason the christians got so upset and called them heretics, islam said it was roundish so they had to be wrong
keep googling, the truth is out there, you need to read more
oh no, more bad news typhoon cookie, how much is a typhoon again ?
i actually thought the buy price was confidential
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/australia-working-on-jets-payments-20100330-r9oe.html
“Australia won’t have to pay more for the Joint Strike Fighters (JSF) it has on order despite US estimates that the cost of each aircraft will exceed $100 million.
The federal government will purchase up to 100 of the aircraft – with the first entering service in 2018 – at a price tag of $75 million each.
Australia was not paying its full share of development costs and only planned to acquire the conventional takeoff and landing variant, head of the Defence Materiel Organisation Stephen Gumley told a Senate hearing on Tuesday.
if i need stealth, i will use f-22
i didnt know Belgium was buying f-22’s
1991 predates GWB’s “propaganda.”
you arent really trying to get through to thick heads, are you?
dont confuse them with facts, their minds are already made up 😀
even my quoted passage didnt make them blink