dark light

jackjack

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 1,733 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 4.99 generation fighter #2395722
    jackjack
    Participant

    now now my little friend, i cant help what you dont know and what you post
    US ? if you meant invers, chances are you’re my neighbour

    in reply to: 4.99 generation fighter #2395729
    jackjack
    Participant

    Again invers invers SAR detect the hole of silence. Againts the Babinet’s principle is RAM and RAS useless and the Babinet’s principle is for interest at rocket guiding and AASR. 😉

    its ok, if you mean inverse sar, i just worked out you dont know and just make it up as you go

    in reply to: 4.99 generation fighter #2395754
    jackjack
    Participant

    RAM can’t absorb all RF. Should RAM can do the complet stealth job you need no F-117, F-22 and F-35. Then must you only paint all your fighters with RAM and it’s stealth. O, I forget RAM is expensiv and not really long time reliable and not fild repairable.

    The $2 Billion Stealth Bomber Can’t Go Out in the Rain
    http://www.nytimes.com/1997/08/23/world/the-2-billion-stealth-bomber-can-t-go-out-in-the-rain.html

    1997…are you trolling or is it simply you dont know ?
    if you dont know i suggest you google, if trolling heck why not use it

    in reply to: Yet another F-35 thread #2397096
    jackjack
    Participant

    i cant believe you’re suggesting an aussie journalist has made a careless mistake

    in reply to: Yet another F-35 thread #2397222
    jackjack
    Participant

    its a simple question which you (and Princess Jackajck) can’t address because it would make you wrong.
    Cheers

    it seems you still have a reading comprehension problem
    March 30, 2010
    http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/australia-working-on-jets-payments-20100330-r9oe.html
    “””The federal government will purchase up to 100 of the aircraft – with the first entering service in 2018 – at a price tag of $75 million each, in 08 tyaud
    Australia was not paying its full share of development costs”””

    we paid 144 mil usd for our share of R&D, [much reduced to real cost]
    our buy price is A$75mil

    so tell me again why aussies would be so much better buying phoons

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2397384
    jackjack
    Participant

    from jj’s last post :
    ‘i’m old and my memory of them is fading’
    That explains a lot, LOL.:rolleyes:

    well help an old man out 😀 repost the rafale and f-22 vids so we can talk and see again how the rafale will wipe the floor with it

    in reply to: 4.99 generation fighter #2397416
    jackjack
    Participant

    yes it seems to be a common public term but it doesnt actually block radar, it signal manages radar through several techs, as radar cant be blocked

    in reply to: Yet another F-35 thread #2397440
    jackjack
    Participant

    None that I am aware of, not that my quote had anything to do with RAAF acquisition of Growlers. I was pointing out how not so great Growler is replacing it’s predecessor in the USN. I do believe you were comparing RAAF potential Growlers to be with the USN acquisition of Growler. I was pointing out the loss of coverage with their ratio.

    you are looking at a direct platform to platform replacement and frankly i think you’re selling the growler short, but no matter
    it doesnt work like this as its a ‘total systems event’ and how each piece works within that system
    the EF-111 and EA-6B doesnt fit anymore and the ‘system’ has moved on

    in reply to: Yet another F-35 thread #2397463
    jackjack
    Participant

    The defence minister in Australia has announced that Australia will buy 207 JSF’s for $105M each at the price quoted by JackJack and sell 100 of them back to the US at just under the real price of $200M so the US get the benefit to help pay for much overdue heath reforms.

    The treasury is looking into buying 100 per year to sell back to our closest allie, and the issue of source code now isn’t important as the US have it already…

    Well I guess I was wrong about the JSF all along.:eek:

    it seems you still haave a reading comprehension problem
    i have said this before for you to read between the lines without stating it directly but its good that it has been publicly disclosed
    “””The federal government will purchase up to 100 of the aircraft – with the first entering service in 2018 – at a price tag of $75 million each [in 2008 then yr $]
    Australia was not paying its full share of development costs”””

    we paid 144 mil usd for our share of R&D, [much reduced to real cost]
    our buy price is A$75mil

    there are advantages in being america’s bbitch, this is but one example, to upset you even more there are better examples :diablo:

    so tell me again why aussies would be so much better buying phoons

    in reply to: Yet another F-35 thread #2398069
    jackjack
    Participant

    Bill is at it again:

    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a193f1ee3-bac2-4a8d-b0b0-c42c84351a6a&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest

    8% increase in range with 30% increase in fuel by using external tanks is … not really impressive, to say the least. Are those numbers correct?

    Perhaps Jwcook is right; perhaps this is the Jack(jack) of all trades, master of none? 🙂

    well if bill said its bad, its time to scrap the f-35, a lot of countries ask him what plane they should buy, it must be a nice earner for him in his spare time

    in reply to: Yet another F-35 thread #2398113
    jackjack
    Participant

    so thats the reason the christians got so upset and called them heretics, islam said it was roundish so they had to be wrong

    in reply to: Yet another F-35 thread #2398211
    jackjack
    Participant

    keep googling, the truth is out there, you need to read more

    in reply to: Yet another F-35 thread #2398342
    jackjack
    Participant

    oh no, more bad news typhoon cookie, how much is a typhoon again ?
    i actually thought the buy price was confidential
    http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/australia-working-on-jets-payments-20100330-r9oe.html
    “Australia won’t have to pay more for the Joint Strike Fighters (JSF) it has on order despite US estimates that the cost of each aircraft will exceed $100 million.

    The federal government will purchase up to 100 of the aircraft – with the first entering service in 2018 – at a price tag of $75 million each.

    Australia was not paying its full share of development costs and only planned to acquire the conventional takeoff and landing variant, head of the Defence Materiel Organisation Stephen Gumley told a Senate hearing on Tuesday.

    in reply to: Yet another F-35 thread #2398461
    jackjack
    Participant

    if i need stealth, i will use f-22

    i didnt know Belgium was buying f-22’s

    in reply to: Yet another F-35 thread #2398464
    jackjack
    Participant

    1991 predates GWB’s “propaganda.”

    you arent really trying to get through to thick heads, are you?
    dont confuse them with facts, their minds are already made up 😀
    even my quoted passage didnt make them blink

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 1,733 total)