i think you should read up on the seppo aesa’s
use google translate, if you dont find stuff on the su, post or read on defencetalk, aussies have airforce personnel permanently based in malayasia
j-7 the malaysian su’s are fitted as multirole
here is something i didnt know
The F/A-18 was the first U.S. fighter capable of supersonic
speeds *supercruise without the use of afterburners.
This capability is limited to missions with no external fuel tanks or
ordnance, and using only air-to-air missiles.
http://www.raha.co.ir/Upload/Mng/R-FI/BoeingF-A-18.pdf
And the political arguement for getting Su-30 was that through-life support from the Russians would be dodgy, at best.
This is the problem Malaysia is now having with the MKM, serviceability is very low.
yep, thats right
we find out at the end of the month, i predict the rafale winning,
and we went for the f-35, the s/hornet buy is unrelated to the su-30 russian offer
“Its the AESA and sensor fusion and EW equipment that give the SH an advantage,”
that says it all really
they went with the su because russia would deliver all the weapon stocks, where usa holds most of the stock for them, to try and prevent regional spats
i got my info on malysian dis-satisfaction from defencetalk, you can do the same or as i suggested go directly to malyasian forums
http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/air-force-aviation/malaysian-rmaf-mig-29s-retire-gasp-9868-2/
“read the old RMAF thread that is now closed, Evidently, reliable sources, like defence professionals and mods have confirmed the existence of contractual difficulties and that the RMAF are unhappy with Sukhoi support. Just because you imagine there is no problem and does not mean that there is no problem.”
malaysia went su because of usa holds missile stock as per their hornets and Singapore f-15 and if you go to malaysian sites, they arent happy with them
what do you base your claim on that the su is better ?
counting the Malaysian Su-30MKM ? They’re very capable birds too and would give the Super Hornet Block II a real run for money.
the usn and raaf disagree with you, but kopp and co backs your view
russia did offer and the raaf did consider a su-30 purchase
the gun is removed and a different wirering loom fitted when built, other than that its basically the same
boeing australia will probably do the fitting
good looking aircraft. the two seater looks nicer than the single.
the RAAF now has the best multirole aircraft in the Asia-Pacific :diablo:
some would say the world
Congratulations to the RAAF. This will allow for timely retirement of the F-111 fleet.
One question- are these Super Hornets the standard USN version with 7.5G limiters ? Or are these 9G fighters as promised in the Indian MRCA competition ?
they are the same plane and fit out as the navy, except for coms and a metric altimeter
Supercruise of a minimum of M 1.5 was a requirement for USAF next fighter, what eventually became F-22.
Low RCS was a nice-to-have-if-feasable feature added only later on, but was not the top priority like high speed was.You are using words that you don’t really grasp, and it confuses you.
who said anything about supercruise ? and the f-22 has AB too, you’re starting to dribble
and as to weapon systems, i’ve got the basics, aussies tech isnt too bad google our joint development with hyshot and hycause
obligatory no, the f-22 is speed limited and doesnt have high supersonic speed, off the top of my head, the f-15 and f111 is quicker and in the 30+ yrs of service you can count in minutes the time spent at top speed
also you are making a basic mistake, its weapon systems that kill missiles, not platform speed
Gosh…are you for real?
Do you get your prozac on subscription or is it knocked off stuff?
dont you think its good news that production deliveries start this year to the forces ?
heck, the F-35 pilots even get fitted with flight gear, sweet
http://www.fox10tv.com/dpp/news/f-35-pilots-get-fitted-for-flight#
Not a surprise :rolleyes:
F-35 in serious disarray
thanks for the link
first delivery of the f-35 to the forces this year
“We have been on the record for quite some time stating that aircraft deliveries are running approximately six months behind schedule and that initial low-rate production aircraft deliveries … will begin in the fourth quarter of 2010,” Lockheed spokesman John Kent said.
“Production trends indicate that we will be back on schedule” by 2011, Kent said.
“Labor hours required to complete each aircraft have dropped by half, and the time required to manufacture an F-35 has dropped by one-third. Parts shortages have gone from 300 on the first aircraft to 16 on the most recent plane rolled out, and the need to borrow parts from other aircraft has greatly diminished. Parts availability continues to improve as the supply chain gears up for higher production rates.”