the future isnt specific, just probable
todays stealth will be countermeaseured but as with other countries designing stealth craft, it develops to higher level

for specific, i thought my placing yourself in 1990 and looking back and forward 20 years would have a very specific result as to the developing stealth

i think its best to keep it very simple and basic for overg
perhaps you should reread his posts he does question it
its the only conclusion that makes sense to his aesa blindness

there is no sense posting something like this for him
“The AN/APG-79 is derived from technology developed by Boeing and Raytheon for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. The radar has an antenna that consists of a matrix of programmable transmit-receive (T/R) modules, which can act cooperatively or individually, allowing the system to act as a “low probability of intercept” radar; a precision jammer; or an ELINT system to locate and target emitters. Functions can be performed simultaneously by allocating blocks of T/R modules to each function; the AN/APG-79 is “multimode” in a very strong sense, since it can actually operate in several modes at the same time, tracking an aerial target while mapping out ground targets. Astonishingly, the high degree of parallelism allows the front-seater and the back-seater to effectively each have their own radar. An AESA is so capable that it is really not entirely accurate to call it a “radar”, since it is more than that.”

what? it has never stopped you from posting

you are wrong
it has been explained
me neither, i just like pointing out your error
most people accept it when they’re wrong, some just keep on rabbiting on

I meant what good is it to track something that will strike you five minutes later somewhere and there is nothing you can do about it.

maybe you should look at projected weapon systems for the time frame of hypersonics aircraft
[ for one, hypersonic weapons are a first step to the hyper plane ]

Will it?
Would you care to expand on the exact detailed knowledge that statement is based on?

get a grip lad, you only need to look at the last 20 years and project that forward
or for pessimists, put yourself in 1990 and the look back 20 years to 70’s and compare that to now

why do you think the 18 with AN/ALQ-214 is better ea wise to the 35 with AN/ASQ-239
as i havent really seen a decent write up on the 239 and i put my hand up as a pleb

edit, i’ll do some reading first, i think i’m starting to get my head around it, totally different systems for a start. i’ll ask some questions if i get stuck
re the f-35 radar, i read a post from someone in defense and he said it does some un-named tricky stuff over the apg-79 and qualifies as a weapon

I know, I was referring to the current lack of internal jammers in the F-22 and F-35.

Here is the USN’s Open Solicitation for the NGJ. Lots of info here.

http://www.navair.navy.mil/doing_business/open_solicitations/solicitation_view_action.cfm?Sol_No=N00019-09-R-0238

arent the ng-pods to make more dedicated ew/jamming platforms to replace growlers etc
these links are average but give an overview
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/awst/2010/01/18/AW_01_18_2010_p43-194997.xml&headline=Next-Generation%20Jammer%20Takes%20Shape

the ew/jammers on the f-35
http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/categories/military/F-35-Electronic-Warfare-Suite-More-Than-Self-Protection_845.html