Deano
I thought that Moderators were supposed to be a ‘cut above the rest’. Regardless of political beliefs, what happened to respect? NewForest is correct.
If you have a smidgeon of decency, you’ll change the title of the subject to either ‘Lady’ or, Mrs. or, ‘Baroness’.
We’re supposed to be a cut above the rest? We’re expendable assets just like anyone else ;). I’ll edit the thread title to keep the peace 🙂
charlie
Many many apologies. If you look at the posts above it looked like you were responding to John. Post edited
Deano
I thought that Moderators were supposed to be a ‘cut above the rest’. Regardless of political beliefs, what happened to respect? NewForest is correct.
If you have a smidgeon of decency, you’ll change the title of the subject to either ‘Lady’ or, Mrs. or, ‘Baroness’.
We’re supposed to be a cut above the rest? We’re expendable assets just like anyone else ;). I’ll edit the thread title to keep the peace 🙂
charlie
Many many apologies. If you look at the posts above it looked like you were responding to John. Post edited
I know of nothing like this in any European Airspace.
Rgds
Dean
I’ve seen this aircraft develop over the last few months. I saw it every week when in Toulouse and then at Finkenwerder when flying into Hamburg. I agree it does look particularly nice in the BA livery, even when it was all green but with the BA tail it looked good.
It’s not that odd to lower the gear if fast. What you might have been seeing is exactly how bmused described it. In most, if not all modern aircraft you have “landing flap settings”. In other words, a degree of flap that is certified to be used for landing (Flap zero is not one of them for obvious reasons). Based on this, an aircraft, if given speed control will have to slow down and in doing so there will be a flap extension schedule for each stage of flap based on weight (amongst other things). If you extend even the first stage of landing flap without dropping the gear first then you will get the gear warning horn. I think the 737 series landing flap settings start from Flap 15 onwards, so you can go to flap 10 without the gear and thereafter you have to drop the gear before any more flap can be extended without the horn going off. A typical example could be this scenario:
Flap 5 extension speed: 210kts
Flap 10 extension speed: 188kts
Flap 15 extension speed: 173kts
If they were told to maintain 160kts then you see they have to extend flap 15, but because Flap 15 is an approved landing flap setting they will have to take the gear between flap 10 and 15 to prevent the horn going off. If ATC gave them any speed below the flap 15 extension speed, even as far out as 15 miles then they would have to take the gear early to enable them to extend flap 15. Clear as mud?
atr42
You are technically wrong about the Q400. The Q400 is a CAT C aeroplane just like the Airbus 320 series and 737 series. This CAT level is based on it’s Vref speed and the Q400 falls in the same threshold speeds as the airbuses and Boeings. We can keep up with anything whilst being vectored in terminal airspace and the only difference in the flap and gear settings on the Q400 is down to the design of the wing. It doesn’t have a swept wing, but a high aspect ratio wing meaning we can have a fairly low manoeuvring speed before we have to drop the gear “pre landing flap”.
Rgds
Dean
Do you have a link for us, Giganick1?
It is more common than one would care to imagine. The laws are ludicrous, if you are at home you have to have a minimum 12hrs rest between duties, if your preceding duty was more than 12hrs then you have to have at least the same amount of time off before starting again, yet when you are away from base in a hotel this rest can be reduced to 11hrs. So you are in an unusual environment, a bed that’s not your own, and usually noisy hotels. I was in Brussels two nights ago, and my room was separated from the one next door by a locked door. The chap in that room snored loudly from 9pm, right through the night until stupid o’clock. I then had to get up and go and fly 5 sectors and do a 12hr duty. Suffice to say today I cannot keep my eyes open.
Also, the question needs to be asked what crews are getting up to on layovers? It’s all very well giving your crew 2-3 days off at a hotel (as I am aware many long haul carriers do), but if they hit the town and get late nights. What’s the point? (But then I guess it’s up to the senior captains to rein in on and report this sort of behaviour, if they don’t they’re not really doing their job)
What do you mean what are crews getting up to on layovers? That’s rather a generalising statement. They can actually do as they please when they are off duty. You make it sound like crews are living it up every time they stay anywhere away from base, the reality is quite different.
It’s actually nothing to do with the “senior captains” either. The only thing that the captains can do is ensure his crew are “fit to fly” on the day. What goes on outside of report time is a) nothing to do with the captain, and b) up to the individual to police for themselves. We’re all adults, I don’t need some jumped up fat wallet captain to tell me what to do when off duty, likewise it isn’t my job to police my crew outside of duty hours.
Fatigue is actually cumulative, it creeps up on you. A few dodgy nights out off duty does not cause fatigue. What causes fatigue is a litany of early shifts, long days, minimum rest periods between duties, different time zones, body clock changes, lates, earlies and a whole wrath of “cumulative” issues.
Amazing video as ever, Angelusky
LBA’s runway is actually alot shorter than that, the declared distances are as follows:
Rwy 14 (Threshold)
TORA: 1803 m
ASDA: 1803 m
LDA: 1802 m
Rwy 32 (Threshold)
TORA: 1913 m
ASDA: 1913 m
LDA: 1916 m
I got back into BRU at 19:40L from Strasbourg tonight having operated out of here all day. Do you have a link that is in English at all?
It’s not unheard of for 8 or 9 aircraft to be buzzing around each VOR hold at a time, barely separated by the legal minimum.
Come off it, Matt. I thought I was reading a headline from the Daily Mail then. Get to the facts, they are either separated by the legal minima or they’re not. The legal minima is there for a reason and it is just that, it is legal. It is more dangerous flying in RVSM airspace at high flight levels with 1,000ft vertical separation than it is holding over a beacon with the same minima lower down. I can see the dramatic headline now – “Aircraft circling above schools and houses with only 1,000ft between them and disaster”.
Thanks MSR, really appreciated. Bad times for all involved.
Thanks threespool, we shall see what happens. As for LIFO, it’s illegal to use it as a single entity for redundancies.
Yes it’s happening, mainly made up of pilots, cabin crew & engineers. We’ve started the 90 day consultation period already.