Does anyone know how to get more aircraft for FS98 or CFS????? I’m getting bored with just having the basic aircraft…..can I transfer a spitfire, for example, from CFS (WW2 Europe Series) to FS98 or vice-versa?????

There are loads of stuff up on flightsim.com. Still alot for FS98.

Good shots, like the klm one.

How does it compare to fsx? As in how big the game is (playing area etc) and the chosie of planes. How big exactly is the online, and how serious are the gamers. Can you have teams etc with head sets for comunication?

black_star

Trust me when I say that if these birds went into production, and you finished your training, and someone offered you a job flying one you would take it, when you come out of training you will take anything, it doesn’t matter what it is, if you think otherwise you are kidding yourself.
I have an interview next week with a major UK carrier to fly their aircraft, but it doesn’t bother me what aircraft it is because I am not in a position to be choosy, the same will apply to you.

Good luck with it

Dean

Ok, i surpose you would be right, but if they offered me a choise between a 2 planes and thta was one of them, i’d take the other. I think my dream plane to fly would be one of the following, 737-800, 777-300, 787-900 and possibly the a340-600. Out of all of them, i think i’d want to fly the 787-900.

You could dream up 1001 potential circumstances that might lead to an aircraft being brought down, but ultimately the chances of that happening are minimised through analysis and design. This aircraft, were it to come into production would be no different. If the designers felt there was a risk associated with having the engines mounted above the fuselage, they’d design their way around the problem. This is simply a model and writing the whole design concept off on the basis of what you see makes no sense!

Let’s leave it at that, shall we? 🙂

Paul

Yes, you’re right. i was bassing my argument on the modle we were shown.

It may be a good idea to leave it at this.

I’m not asuming it definatly would, but it looks as if it could damage the plane as it dosn’t have much space for it to fall away cleanly. Of corse to compinsate for that they will be properly sercured, but in the event of it happerning, then the damge could be fasr worse than if it could cleanly fall away.

I’m just saying my oppion. It dons’t look that safe, if the engin has exces vibration, they are desinged to fall off. If it falls of that thing, then it looks as if it will take out the tail with it.

I know pilots have to learn on turboprops, but that one dosn’t look that safe for the reasons i have said above. I know exactly why i wish to become a pilot, and i was saying i don’t wish to fly one of those.

In my oppion, i don’t like that plane.

I still don’t like the look of the ones with the exposed fan blades. I want ot be a pilot eventually and i don’t want to e flying something that looks like my grannies, hand fan. With the “beaker”, what are the ends of the wings? Also, i don’t really care about the enviroment sound aircraft. Airlines would want something faster and more fuel ecinomic, and not eviromently safe. If you were an owner of a multibillion airline, what would you want, A slower enviromently safe aircraft, or a faster aircraft with only fuel consiumsion saved? I know i’d go for the latter.