dark light

Gollevainen

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,311 through 2,325 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #353192
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    white

    feminist or enveriomentalists

    in reply to: Game: A or B #1944001
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    white

    feminist or enveriomentalists

    in reply to: General Discussion #353895
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    Im more on to the left and thougth market-economyes with the idea of need and supply migth work outside of capitalism…i would still be rather against it…
    lot of people forgets about the cruel systems that provocates the free trade in the intress of spreading it to the others along with acconpaning ‘democracy’, ‘freedom’ and bla, bla bla…when the same time the main advagates of this ‘package’ (called ‘western’ :confused: ) behaves totally against their own thesis. Also people tend to forget that main reasons to advogate free trade is the fact that they could side link normal product trade into trade of services and employment and this by the only reason that the ownership wants to make dust from all the grand achievments of the workers movment. And when they want to open the thridword to the ‘freedom’ they do it to prevent strong working class movment to rise in these areas…

    …But, reality has proven that capitalist/market economy system doesent work at its best with closed system and under protectionism so if one must to practive the ‘worser’ way of economics, I wouldnt say yes to the free trade…if it doesent do anything more than increase the bad affects of the system, then so shall it be…attleast the revolutionar movment has its ultimate opportunity to strike back when the whole machine comes to crumbeling down… No sosialist or other alternative solutions can rise from of the capitalist system, but to replace its ruins….

    in reply to: Free trade: For, against, indifferent? your thoughts #1944262
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    Im more on to the left and thougth market-economyes with the idea of need and supply migth work outside of capitalism…i would still be rather against it…
    lot of people forgets about the cruel systems that provocates the free trade in the intress of spreading it to the others along with acconpaning ‘democracy’, ‘freedom’ and bla, bla bla…when the same time the main advagates of this ‘package’ (called ‘western’ :confused: ) behaves totally against their own thesis. Also people tend to forget that main reasons to advogate free trade is the fact that they could side link normal product trade into trade of services and employment and this by the only reason that the ownership wants to make dust from all the grand achievments of the workers movment. And when they want to open the thridword to the ‘freedom’ they do it to prevent strong working class movment to rise in these areas…

    …But, reality has proven that capitalist/market economy system doesent work at its best with closed system and under protectionism so if one must to practive the ‘worser’ way of economics, I wouldnt say yes to the free trade…if it doesent do anything more than increase the bad affects of the system, then so shall it be…attleast the revolutionar movment has its ultimate opportunity to strike back when the whole machine comes to crumbeling down… No sosialist or other alternative solutions can rise from of the capitalist system, but to replace its ruins….

    in reply to: General Discussion #353908
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    radio

    opera or balett

    in reply to: Game: A or B #1944271
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    radio

    opera or balett

    in reply to: General Discussion #353910
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    cancel all fligths on the game dates 😀 😀 😉 😀

    in reply to: german terrorist decision #1944274
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    cancel all fligths on the game dates 😀 😀 😉 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #353919
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    dogs

    panther or tiger

    in reply to: Game: A or B #1944286
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    dogs

    panther or tiger

    in reply to: General Discussion #353926
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    MiGs

    up or down

    in reply to: Game: A or B #1944293
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    MiGs

    up or down

    in reply to: General Discussion #353993
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    sex

    with male or female :p

    in reply to: Game: A or B #1944306
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    sex

    with male or female :p

    in reply to: General Discussion #354264
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    religions are at best to be descriped as sosial phenemmenon and has therefore some part in cultures and cultural heritage, and thus making it justicaple in ethichal consideration but thats is far most closest they get when taking about realism…so comparing things that rose from unwareness and imagination and justificating ruling class power status to deniable reality is bit too off the track…there is no ‘deeper’ explanation to bringing religious feelings par whit real lifes events that took place in reality rather than imagination…thats the point YOU (and rest of the lot who consider themself as religious, no matter to what god/gods they kneel) seem to not understand…so its rather useless to try to peel on my sense of reasoning backing it whit things that rose from unreasoning in first place…

    nor its polite to use that sort of ununderstandaple slang to a one that doesent speak english as his native language…

    N that is the difference which you will never be able to understand. So u keep on with it peep coz i aint backing either against those who are imagining thingz out of proportion.

    are you saying that people are just imaginating Holocaust?? :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 2,311 through 2,325 (of 2,664 total)