Well if you wanna play cames, the lets play?
Why is australia as it is now created by the west? Well if it isen’t, then who did it? I have stated it many times before but lets do it one more time…
Australia was first inhabited by imigrants coming from souht-east asia via Indonesia and New Guinea. Those inhabitants were on the move becouse the current predessors of modern chinese where inhabiting their former dwelling lands. Now these became the “aborginals”. Thousend of years went by and that aborginal population recived some input from other micronesian and souht pasific populations but nothing to make any significant changes on the population nor importing any innovations that would led those aborginals to developt out from the developing phase they were…
But then came man savage in the night….White mens, from WEST and they set new order to Australia. Immigrants form all over WEST estabilised a civilisation in which the modern Australian sosiety is based on. It’s as direct continuation from the cultural direction know generaly as western culture (christian-antique) as the ones set to another new continent, America.
Cultures arent just mirrors of the moment, they are results of larger complex, a long term continuty of civilication and society. In terms of current level of Australian culture, it can be descriped as civilication, but the important thing is, that it didnt rose as domestic product. Australian enveriomental conditions werent suitable for rabid evolution from hunter-collector society into modern civilication, perhaps in very, very very long term, aborginalas would have achieved it, but in global timeline, it was just matter of time that some other civilication anxested the continent and its rooting cultures, replacing it by one they brougth along
Modern Australia is based on western culture, it’s so obivios that even me, here thousands of kilometers away can see it. I wont deny that there isen’t any imput form non-western culture, you are good indication of it. But you cannot say that Australian culture is changed dramatically away from it’s western herritage becouse of this. Also i’m not denying that in over these years, australian culture wouldn’t been developing to its own direction. No, as in USA there is certain new and domestical cultural factors, but they haven’t surpassed the comon herritage and same basis that gave birth to it.
You see, we finns are also part of this large family of western culture. We had our own direction but were introduced to the western culture about thousand years ago….and there still is some clear signs of that orginal one…But there isen’t any orginal Australian culture as the culture came alongside the Immigrants, not like in our case were the immigrants brought us their culture and mixed to the orginal population.
But isen’t it nice that we are practically one big happy family 😉
Well if you wanna play cames, the lets play?
Why is australia as it is now created by the west? Well if it isen’t, then who did it? I have stated it many times before but lets do it one more time…
Australia was first inhabited by imigrants coming from souht-east asia via Indonesia and New Guinea. Those inhabitants were on the move becouse the current predessors of modern chinese where inhabiting their former dwelling lands. Now these became the “aborginals”. Thousend of years went by and that aborginal population recived some input from other micronesian and souht pasific populations but nothing to make any significant changes on the population nor importing any innovations that would led those aborginals to developt out from the developing phase they were…
But then came man savage in the night….White mens, from WEST and they set new order to Australia. Immigrants form all over WEST estabilised a civilisation in which the modern Australian sosiety is based on. It’s as direct continuation from the cultural direction know generaly as western culture (christian-antique) as the ones set to another new continent, America.
Cultures arent just mirrors of the moment, they are results of larger complex, a long term continuty of civilication and society. In terms of current level of Australian culture, it can be descriped as civilication, but the important thing is, that it didnt rose as domestic product. Australian enveriomental conditions werent suitable for rabid evolution from hunter-collector society into modern civilication, perhaps in very, very very long term, aborginalas would have achieved it, but in global timeline, it was just matter of time that some other civilication anxested the continent and its rooting cultures, replacing it by one they brougth along
Modern Australia is based on western culture, it’s so obivios that even me, here thousands of kilometers away can see it. I wont deny that there isen’t any imput form non-western culture, you are good indication of it. But you cannot say that Australian culture is changed dramatically away from it’s western herritage becouse of this. Also i’m not denying that in over these years, australian culture wouldn’t been developing to its own direction. No, as in USA there is certain new and domestical cultural factors, but they haven’t surpassed the comon herritage and same basis that gave birth to it.
You see, we finns are also part of this large family of western culture. We had our own direction but were introduced to the western culture about thousand years ago….and there still is some clear signs of that orginal one…But there isen’t any orginal Australian culture as the culture came alongside the Immigrants, not like in our case were the immigrants brought us their culture and mixed to the orginal population.
But isen’t it nice that we are practically one big happy family 😉
yeas, propaply you should pay a bit more better attention to your homecountrys history…Or do you still disagree??
…no, sorry you were ignoring… 😎 😎 :p :p 😮
yeas, propaply you should pay a bit more better attention to your homecountrys history…Or do you still disagree??
…no, sorry you were ignoring… 😎 😎 :p :p 😮
Ah, Lighten up. You have the same sense of humor as the people rioting in the streets, threatening genocide of innocents because of a cartoon.
For example if i’ve to say you are a pathetic fag and your mother is ***** Would you be pissed? would you understand my explanations, Hey it was just for laugh, where’s your sense of humour? (in case if you don’t get it, i’m only using you as an example, so don’t get offended about it 😉 )
It’s always easy to make fool from someone else, only if it was for laugh and you didn’t really mean it…but try to be the one taking to heat, it doesen’t comfront you if they were doing it just for fun. it still hurts your feelings and when peaples get hurt, they usually retaliate and brush out their anrger…
Ah, Lighten up. You have the same sense of humor as the people rioting in the streets, threatening genocide of innocents because of a cartoon.
For example if i’ve to say you are a pathetic fag and your mother is ***** Would you be pissed? would you understand my explanations, Hey it was just for laugh, where’s your sense of humour? (in case if you don’t get it, i’m only using you as an example, so don’t get offended about it 😉 )
It’s always easy to make fool from someone else, only if it was for laugh and you didn’t really mean it…but try to be the one taking to heat, it doesen’t comfront you if they were doing it just for fun. it still hurts your feelings and when peaples get hurt, they usually retaliate and brush out their anrger…
It’s also a standard North Korean tactic to hide behind island’s shadow and pop out at a close range.
I think that is the comon tactic to all navyes relying in FACs….
But as we are now talking about North-korean navy, anyone happened to have any pics on the mysteriuos Soho class Catamaran frigate? I know it’s propaply pointless even to ask but lets give it a change….
damn you cannot go and scare people like that…. 😉
but i tough there would be some “to my sweet satan” type of stuff….
damn you cannot go and scare people like that…. 😉
but i tough there would be some “to my sweet satan” type of stuff….
And ahem, you explained in your own words what i ment that you didnt cath the idea.
We werent talking about current austrailian culture mix but roots of its civilication and where it was born
well to me its quite irrelevant to where you live to understand that austrailian culture isent home-made, born by people living from pre-neolethic era to empirialisation totally whitout foreing influences….You in my mind was denying that european immigrants had nothing to do whit the raise of civilisation in austrailia and therefore austrailia is an totally independent cultural enverioment and analogn to Chinese, south american and mediterenian/european cultural hemispheres
or do you need to be an aussie to understand this, or do you have totally different idea of your cultural evolution?? Antropology and ethnologyes are one of my side intrest considering my future career so dont be shy 😉 😉
And ahem, you explained in your own words what i ment that you didnt cath the idea.
We werent talking about current austrailian culture mix but roots of its civilication and where it was born
well to me its quite irrelevant to where you live to understand that austrailian culture isent home-made, born by people living from pre-neolethic era to empirialisation totally whitout foreing influences….You in my mind was denying that european immigrants had nothing to do whit the raise of civilisation in austrailia and therefore austrailia is an totally independent cultural enverioment and analogn to Chinese, south american and mediterenian/european cultural hemispheres
or do you need to be an aussie to understand this, or do you have totally different idea of your cultural evolution?? Antropology and ethnologyes are one of my side intrest considering my future career so dont be shy 😉 😉
Chinawhite to chiniee ??.
well i doupt that you like to read my limited explanaition of Finnish grammar here, but take notice that Finnish defference from english as much as chinise does, its part of uralic languages, its most lively representator along whit maygar (hungarian, i believe in english??) language. There’s nothing that commonality that can be find from indo-european languages…
So trust me, when i say, chinawhite is bit tricky one in constant use
I went out to answer your question with quotes and my own opinoin. Everything i wrote i understood. Your little explaination at the end when i was reading it was to me exactly what i though and what i wrote.
Well how to say this, It didint look like that. There were good points in your quotes, but they were too general to explain directly the ideas i was hunting at. Sure I could have read them between the lines, but there was no gurantee that you had done the same, as mean time you pointed out some petty, nearly-out-of-contest detail whit the same quote. You remember that most of your posting was ranting about how Australian culuture didnt had any relationship to european cultures…
Chinawhite to chiniee ??.
well i doupt that you like to read my limited explanaition of Finnish grammar here, but take notice that Finnish defference from english as much as chinise does, its part of uralic languages, its most lively representator along whit maygar (hungarian, i believe in english??) language. There’s nothing that commonality that can be find from indo-european languages…
So trust me, when i say, chinawhite is bit tricky one in constant use
I went out to answer your question with quotes and my own opinoin. Everything i wrote i understood. Your little explaination at the end when i was reading it was to me exactly what i though and what i wrote.
Well how to say this, It didint look like that. There were good points in your quotes, but they were too general to explain directly the ideas i was hunting at. Sure I could have read them between the lines, but there was no gurantee that you had done the same, as mean time you pointed out some petty, nearly-out-of-contest detail whit the same quote. You remember that most of your posting was ranting about how Australian culuture didnt had any relationship to european cultures…
Spelling?. You spell my name right 99% of the time while you spell this wrong?. very childish
Well read again what i wrote: Your name is so akward to finnish gramar that i CHOOSE to use a simplyer form that time, and in future…I have spelled your name rigth in the past as i have consentrated to it, That time I deliberatly didnt want to consentrate…
Acutally i felt a lot more superior to you know since the Soviet vs Nato strategy thread way back. This just proved you couldn’t even hold your own discussion since you never read my post
Again I read your post, those parts you simply copy&pasted and those you wrote on yourself. There werent any indicators that you would have understood my orginal guestion in the parts you wrote on yourself. I dont know about austrailian culutre, but in here it isent enough to show your claims in some one elses writings. So dont feel too cocky over it… 😀 😀
Spelling?. You spell my name right 99% of the time while you spell this wrong?. very childish
Well read again what i wrote: Your name is so akward to finnish gramar that i CHOOSE to use a simplyer form that time, and in future…I have spelled your name rigth in the past as i have consentrated to it, That time I deliberatly didnt want to consentrate…
Acutally i felt a lot more superior to you know since the Soviet vs Nato strategy thread way back. This just proved you couldn’t even hold your own discussion since you never read my post
Again I read your post, those parts you simply copy&pasted and those you wrote on yourself. There werent any indicators that you would have understood my orginal guestion in the parts you wrote on yourself. I dont know about austrailian culutre, but in here it isent enough to show your claims in some one elses writings. So dont feel too cocky over it… 😀 😀