ahem, try the ice on the stick untill it brakes, that’s my motto and I will defend anybodys rigth to do it also. Thougth no one should lift his hand up in the air in the danmark and say: ” Hey sorry I didnt know its going to couse a fuzz…” I think there has been some sort of purpose of that who ever published/drew those pics. And propaply it wasent the smartest thing a drawer could came up whit, I mean, caricatures should be funny, and those werent, they practically woved for attention and scandal…well they certainly have it now…Its nice to see that Rasmussen taking a bit of crawling for once

Not black but looking same as Jasser Arafat&co. 😎

But man, you live in bad world, today our biggest headline was that One dude shot a police man and they shoot back (luckyly no one get killed) And this is big deal in here as usually Police shoots road kill deers…Even if somewhere some cop fires a warning shot, its on national head lines…

2. Remote controlled killerrobots 😮

Always look at the bright side of life….

….becouse i’m no pilot….so it’s good to have positive ways of looking things at the end 😀

4. Coffee machines

nuff from me

this is not debate nor dicussion its just arguing. I come to the conclusion whatever i write you always have some twist in it

bye bye

“….The monkey in the corner wrote
The lesson in his book“

You know that one would have been much smarter thing to say, If I wouldnt use the exactly same words myself just few hours ago in that other forum 😉 😉 😉 😀 :rolleyes: 😎 :p

Constant squallbling………..

Im just wondering if you read the articles or my post at all

I gave my opinion of why europe increase its lead and providing reasons and examples of this while my articles explain why china became inward instead of outward. I can cut and paste my post to prove to you i wrote it all

well you do that if it pleases you, i read what you wrot…hmm…copy and pasted and you didnt show any indications that you would have understood its relevance to this question. It isent enough that it happens in your mind, but it has to be shown in your text if you want to impress me.

Because the advert of Leninism-Marxism. Marixism had flaws in its original theory which lenin had to correct in his own forms

wow, This why i like so much about discussions whit teenagers, they so boldly puts in two sentence a thing that even experts arent unanimous…
But go ahead, proove this, point out the faults of Marx and Engels writings and how exatly Lenin fixed them and faulty again, as you say and I will do what ever you want me to do…

The reason the cultral revolution and and great leap forward where needed were because of the expereince in soviet production. Figures are just figures. Goals to achieve dont bring development. If china had earlier experience with capitalism it would be a true superpower.

Those useles waste of life and limp were only factors of Maos megalomaniacism and testical contest whit russians. Mao wanted to show of and when he relaised (or did he realised that in first place?) that its impossiple, he simply ignored it and made up and ‘theory’ to get there.

But I agree, if China would have been in the similar levels than western europe, they would have had lot more better starting points to supermacy. But this only if they would have followed the theory and wouldnt have falled into Proletarian-dictature trap as Russians did.

Fall of the industralised west in favour of communism was one

and who says that this will not happen? Remember, Marx in most of the all was a prophetical in these matters, he didnt set up dates. And Like i already told you, Engels predicted that first opportunity wouldnt go well. The battle still goes on laddy, And it will fall, I bet my hat on it 😉 😎 😎