well okay…equally difficoult;)
Well I quess it might be easier than trying to tell that to certain people in certain country which basicly grew out of all the religious nutcases of europe being driven there…:dev2:
Well I quess it might be easier than trying to tell that to certain people in certain country which basicly grew out of all the religious nutcases of europe being driven there…:dev2:
I think its good that the religious aspect of the calendar is taken away, as there is unlikely any change for getting international calendar that isent based on lifeline of some fairytale figure.
world needs to get rid of all religions and all steps like these are welcome for the future;)
I think its good that the religious aspect of the calendar is taken away, as there is unlikely any change for getting international calendar that isent based on lifeline of some fairytale figure.
world needs to get rid of all religions and all steps like these are welcome for the future;)
MR-500 Kliver is called Big Net by NATO.
Fut-N is Slim Net.
But if the rif was cancelled before the pr. 56, then would it be strange that it would be fitted on the pr.56M which followed it?
To make things more clearer, here’s a linedrawing from the pr.56M, I’ve marked the radar which I’m talking about.
Well to follow on the radar question series, What radar was carried in the project 56M Kildin’s forward mast befoe the upgrations? The size of the radar plate is somewhat similar to Kliver but the aft weight-balanancer and the “horn” are different. All my sources states that the vessel carries a Fut-N (Slim Net) and a some undescriped radar called Rif. Is Rif the one fitted in the forward mast and is it air search or associated to the SS-N-1??
The punishment should have focused so that the drivers, Alonso and Hamlinton should have been the ones that looses the points. Its far more severe than just loosing the manufacture points. It would really teach them a lessons..
….bloody Mclaren…kept making BS cars all the years when finnish drivers drove with them but now as all the finns are gone suddenly no more technological proplems:mad: 😡 :dev2: :rolleyes: 😉 :p
The punishment should have focused so that the drivers, Alonso and Hamlinton should have been the ones that looses the points. Its far more severe than just loosing the manufacture points. It would really teach them a lessons..
….bloody Mclaren…kept making BS cars all the years when finnish drivers drove with them but now as all the finns are gone suddenly no more technological proplems:mad: 😡 :dev2: :rolleyes: 😉 :p
But if I belive that Elvis is still alive, would it make me comming from same vein than holocaust denials and Hitlers-alive-belivers or from same as those who belive that world is 6000 thousand years old and Iraq had WMDs???
You are quite good making “if-he-says-this-then-he-have-to-be-saying-that-too” type of assumptions of other persons and then falling to making personal attacks towards then based on that wonderfull logic of yours…
But if I belive that Elvis is still alive, would it make me comming from same vein than holocaust denials and Hitlers-alive-belivers or from same as those who belive that world is 6000 thousand years old and Iraq had WMDs???
You are quite good making “if-he-says-this-then-he-have-to-be-saying-that-too” type of assumptions of other persons and then falling to making personal attacks towards then based on that wonderfull logic of yours…
It should…yeas but some sources (which greditability is bit questionable) states that its the Top trough. Is there any list of which ships had Kliver and which ones had the Top trough or what ever it russian designation is. Or is there ever been such a radar called Top Trough by NATO??
Yeah thats what I was doing, Insulting americans…
…why did I even bothered? :confused: :confused:
No. I demand it from you, becouse you made silly and baseless claim, that You so clearly cannot back up. You just try to twist it and hide behind comments that closes up to mockery and throw out silly comments like the Slovenian (or was it slovakia…:rolleyes: :rolleyes: ) example, yet even not bothering to back up your claims. Face it, there isent just man enough in you to admitt that you were wrong:)
And Im not fantazising over anything, Just claiming that AK is good weapon, and its generations main competitors doesen’t posess any qualities that makes them better pick than AK. Also I have all the time said that All Assault rifles are in practice as good as others what comes to accuracy, ergonomy and desing, but where AK triumphs is in its reability, and that is the most important factor of all in the main use of such rifles.
Perhaps for gun-crazy american civilians a soft and comfortable stocks and other penny details can do lot of differences when shooting in tidy gun ranges with too big weapons for that use… But fortuanetly I dont share that experience, I speak only from my subjective personal experience from my army days. Even a thougth of going into war knowing that there is big change for your weapon to jam or that its operationality is dicdated by the conditions you crawl with it…gives me creeps:eek:
Once again, Ergonomics improves combat effectiveness, something which is impossible to numerically quantify within the confines of this thread. I am astonished that you are unable to understand it
OK, if you clearly want to act like a seven year old, I propaply must start speak to you like I do with kids…
PART I: I have numerious time told you that I agree (that means that I think the same way like you in this matter, if the concept of that word is obscure to you) with You, that better ergonomics can improve the overal figthing capacity of the weapon, BUT (and Here comes the important part) THATS NOT WHAT IM ASKING from you.
PART II: Im asking from you, how does the ergonomics improve the accuracy of the rifle. Simple as that. Not how does it improve its overal handling, but how does it improve its shots.
Lol, keep telling yourself that. Just becouse you dont want to believe that the weapon you are so in love with is now outdated and inferior to most modern western designs
No. Every weapon has its physical age, and REMEBER Slovenia inherited all of its equipment by war booty from JNA in 1990. No matter JNA would have used M-16s, there would be in need of replacement by now.
So therefore, our Slovenian friends goes shopping. And when we know that Slovenians are in high speed towards to becoming another Washington Lapdog in europe, so they purchase of weapons are 99% NOT going to come from countries that are potential enemies to NATO, but more likely from NATO countries. And you Can start counting yourself of how many NATO country currently manufactures Kalashnikoviks.
There, spot the pattern?