Gollevainen, are you aware that the majority of people in Northern Ireland do not want to be part of a united Ireland?

Thats why I support the small section of the people wanting it. Look, they are being even opressed by their own majority:eek::eek:;)

Unlikely. As far as I’m concerned, there isen’t any unite strong arab world which would be bold enough to attack Israel. Syria nor even Iran alone wont do it, they aren’t that mad. If Isreal is the attacker, well thats a different story. Israel seems to be quite blatantly ignoring all international comdemns and warnings when it decides to do something. If it thinks it has some reasons to attack lets say Syria, I wont that it will do it.

But if the relations between USA are already alledgedly in not so good state, then I think last thing Israel wants to do is to attack a sovreign nation and risk it really becoming a seccond South Africa which it’s slowly but steadily transfering itself with it’s policy towards the Palestinian people.

So when I first wonder how the brittish supporting party always seems to hide behind “but they did afull stuff too” veil when asked if they can comdemn the warcrimes made by the side they support, then I get an awnser where someone does exactly like that…:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Now who said anything about Finland getting terrorist attacks? I asked can you and those with similar obinions condemn the events of Bloody Sunday?
Becouse I can condemn and will condemn the act of terrorism against innocent civils made by IRA/PIRA even if I support their cause and North Irelands right to be free from Brithish rule and their fight against brithish military*

*If you join a professional army, get dragged to conflict zone and take some hits, buhuu, choose a better profession…

Thats funny becouse just about **EVERY** article or written text about pr. 885 descripes it’s weaponry little bit different than the other…

I find it funny how the brittish supporters here try to hide behind other deeds when defending the bloody Sunday. Actually it’s quite common. Usually when I depate with someone over issues like finnish civil war or something else, I get the “but they killed this and that many people in…” type of comments when I mention some crime made by the party my counter depator is supporting. I guess I fall to the same trap myself sometimes, when someone throws some crime of my “favourate” side against me, I try to go around it and dig up stuff that the “other side” had done..

Now I’m fully/blindly supporting catholic irish resistant over imperialistic brittain occupation altough I have never even visited in Northern Irland. I always support the opressed ones even if the “oppression” is more of sympolical as it may often seen in Northern Irlands case.

Yet I can condem the deeds of IRA/PIRA as act of terrorism. Can those who fully/blindly supports brittish side condem their “warcrimes” (I don’t know better suited term of legal countries making act of terrorism)?? Without the “but they killed this and that many in some bombings before, after or at the same time” of the act of crime in questions???

Well you think Hizzbollah and Hamas + all the other assorted bands down there will just sit iddle and watch the perfect opportunity to pass by…??

Given Israeli performance in the last “war” against Hizbollah, Id say a long time…

may be it will improve his winning chances in next presidential election

Does his “chances” actually needs to be improved? I mean I wouldn’t be my money over any other “candinate”:rolleyes: