dark light

Gollevainen

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A few questions #2521668
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    should be pronounced ‘Soo’ and not ‘Ess You’.

    …but thats only due the limitation of the current westernesse…we pronounce and write it as it is, Su:p 😉

    in reply to: A few questions #2521737
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    Well as a artillerist I leave these questions to the ones knowing more about aviation, but the first one is really simple. Two different OKBs (design bureyus). Su stands for Sukhoi’s OKB (named, like all soviet aircraft design bureyus, after their formers) and MiG stands for Mikojan & Gurevich…

    in reply to: what is the story with this F-4 Phantom? #2522123
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    or PS??

    Gollevainen
    Participant

    1. I don’t know much about Finland, that’s why I asked “Did Finland participate”!

    Well thats why I asked;)

    2. “A clear alligment with Sweden and by that back bone, Make Stalin think otherwise with his warplans.”

    And just why would Sweden abandon their neutrality policy to join in an alliance whose sole reason for existing would be to commit Sweden to fighting the USSR over someone else’s territory?

    a. Finland has been part of Sweden for 700 years, so we were still then and before considered as atleast some level of ‘area of intrest’ to Sweden.

    b. There actually was plans for this during the mid 30’s, and my memory states them to come from Swedens side and reject by our pride.

    I presented it as an idea that would have happen, IF we would had have more healtyer political climate, more akin to Sweden than other newly independent eastern european countries.

    3. Ok, now I know a bit more about Finland’s actions in that era… and yes, it sounds like they were a typical early 1900s nation… they did nasty things that we, now, view as unacceptable… but which were the “normal” for most nations at that time.

    Judge them by what they had been taught as right and wrong, not by our current standards.

    No, Like I said, those actions were condemndet by the people at the time. Our nation was divided to the Reds and Whites after the civil war and almoust half of our citicens lived under fear during the 30’s. Ironically it was the winter war that finaly begun the unification of our nation, but the rigth wing tendensies that flowered in the ruling rigth wing elite was deemed comdendaple by the opposition of that time.

    Would I like our society to go back to the way we were before WW 2? NO!

    I am not sure there was any nation I would prefer to live in from that time more than I would most of the “Western” nations today. All of us have learned from our past, and most of us are much better places to live because of that. Just ask any “African-American”, “Hispanic”, “Native American”, “Asian-American”, etc if the US is a better place now for his ethnicity than it was in the 1940s.

    Yeas, Im not claiming otherwise. This whole thing came up becouse the current generation, in the wave of Soviet collapse has once again forgotten the concept of Geo-strategical realism and again tries to seek confrontation with Russia, all in same manners that it was done before the WWII. And past is a good teacher and never has anything good come from the smallest kid in the sandbox throwing sand into the eyes of the biggest one. And allinging whit the biggest kids opponent would only mean, that when the confrontation comes, it would be fougth atop the face of the smallest kid…

    Gollevainen
    Participant

    When you say “normal heavy industry” products, could you be more specific? This stuff is fascinating (to me at least). The Soviet Union has been often the target of propoganda (eg read Clancys works) where the average soviet worker is described to be living in a veritable gulag of shoddy civilian goods, since they only made military items. But your description (and ties with other countries) indicates that the standard of living, and modernisation was not so different.

    well they were humans, werent they;) A lot of finnish exports were normal consumer goods as well, clothes, food and stuff. Im not that aware of specific piecemeal level of what we sold there, other than the basic civilian industrial goods. We didnt export any miliatry related material, only few of the speciallised ships went into VMF use, but non of them were fighting ships.

    Not trying to hijack this thread; but I’ve been wondering about a thing for quite some time now. Why did Finland end up with F-18 Hornets?

    At that time I would believe that F-16, F-18, Gripen and Mirage would have been options. Gripen was at that time quite an imature fighter, making it a dark horse despite the good relations between Finland and Sweden. Mirage was french, making it a bad choice (just as Gripen) if you want to send Moscow a signal saying that Finland got powerful friends. A US product would be suitable – and here comes the question: If you want a US jet for fighter role, why go for the mud-moving F/A-18 Hornet instead of F-16

    ?

    To my knowledge, the F-16 wasent in the bidding contest. The first requirments were for single engined interceptor…eg Griben, but the Air Force showed all the way an attitude that we want the biggest and most american one of them all. I have somewhere picked a rumour that Hornet was chosen as it presented, objectively looked, a best candinate of all the planes…

    Gollevainen
    Participant

    In this case, I would ask you to examine Finland’s actions and alternatives, rather than just its alliance with Nazi Germany. Did Finland participate in the purges and slaughter of economic & racial minorities? If not, then there is little to be degrading yourselves on on that point. As to the choice of allies, at the time, you had only three choices… all of them bad.

    Now, you are throwing sticks to fire that you arent even aware what ignited it. As a proud memember of finnist left wing, I have all reason to bash our political climate during the first three decade of our independence. It was wrong, we know it then, we know it now. There isent any remorse, nor revisionist turn-coatism. Our government and expecially our army slaughtered tens of thousand of finnish workers in the summer of 1918, and no one needed to pay a single fine from those crimes. The goverment was then infested with Racist hate-mongering greater-finland advocates (AKS) that twisted the whole sosial life to allowdly anti-russian and anti sosialist tendencies cousing much drift and political witch-hunting. Our own warmongering was the ultimate reason to make Russia suscpicious over our goals and our stance in outcoming world war. It was generally similar in All those nations that the illfamous Molotov-Rittentrop agreement “gave” to Stalin. Wonder no-one never takes that account…

    We sended all Jews we could get into Auschwitz (fortuanetly by mere byrocratical slagg, the total number remained, I think 7…), tortured and executed numerous against-war communist and made plans for ethinical purification of the Karelia region of Russia that we occupied.

    Whitout the rigth-wing rule, I have no doupt that there wouldn’t have been change to stay neutral, or even better, A clear alligment with Sweden and by that back bone, Make Stalin think otherwise with his warplans. You tend to ignore the fact we were ‘neutral’ aka all alone in the 1939, basicly becouse of our rigth-wings stubbornes to lean towards Sweden (ultimately from same nationalistic mambo-jambo BS that made them rant over Russia). After the winter war, everyone wanted revenge and as the rise of German rose, the AKS minded people saw German as the ultimate ally to accomplish their wet-dreams. The situation in 1941 didn’t by anyway forced us to enter the war, we did it by our own free-will choice, and I dont know about you, but to me thats a pretty good reason to show remorse…

    And there was always the change to seek alligment in the Allyes, but no one wanted that, becouse the then thougth ‘racially inferior’ Russians were on their side, and gee, we wanted to kick their ass so bad that it wouldn’t be possiple att all…

    Gollevainen
    Participant

    In most presentative means, Ships. We have build all Soviet major Ice Breakers (exept the Lenin, and Arktica classes) and lot of specialliced ice strenghten cortainer ships and tugs as well as huge tonnage of normal commercial ships.
    Also, normal heavy indstry products (Like I said, before the war preparations, our industry was almoust completely wood-forrest oriented.) Also Finnish construction workers have made lot of building assigments in quite High key soviet buildings, like Hotel Moskva and the Virü Hotel in Tallin. Also, our textile industry was almoust completely tasked by soviet exports. Thats why it almoust completely vanished in the early 90’s:( 🙁
    It didn’t show in larger charts, becouse, in the end, we were small producer, but perhaps the Ice-breakers presents the most visiple element of this.

    Gollevainen
    Participant

    The Vozhd is long dead.

    Regarding JASSM: What’s the point of having a handful of these? Not enough for serious work. And, btw, I’m not aware that Russia is threatening Finland.

    My thougths exactly. I think that the whole deal was made under the rigth presumption that the US would refuse it and that way the NATO lobby would get good election tool to boast their Russian-bear scaring of the voters.

    Gollevainen
    Participant

    I’m not surprised by your left-wing perspective, because, after all, Finland was probably one of the most socialistic countries in post-war Europe. I’ve even read that the fines for speeding in Finland are based on income – now there’s taking social equality to the point of near insanity.

    But by that, We live in top five riches country in the world, one of the most safest of them all (140 murders in last year, and that was a record level)…So I dont see your point? Its all about what sosiety needs to be. All university level education is free for all, and our school system also rank top ten in the world and it has gained its fruit, we were the ones practically inventing modern time self-phone culture and its thecnical applications. Free health care….

    I wouldnt change it for anything;) So lets not take this my country is better than your anyway longer (becouse no one cannot compete with us:p )

    In retrospect, every pre-WWII government in Europe displayed a propensity for undemocatic, fascistic or socialistic policies. Your sense of national guilt isn’t altogether unjustified, but it is revisionist.

    Revisionist?? What do you mean by that? You think there is some sort of justification to holocaust, nazism and other facist tyrany? Sorry but I dont read the Mein Kampf so carefully that I would understood your logic

    It is a peculiar fact of history that of the countries that fell within the Soviet area of hegemony, Stalin spared only Finland and Yugoslavia from complete domination. It is obvious that Stalin was deterred by Tito’s very effective resistance to the Nazi, and equally impressive defense preparations taken after WWII. Less obvious is Stalin’s relative leniency with Finland. Why did he only settle for “tribute,” instead of outright control. Finland was far less formidable than Tito-era Yugoslavia. Perhaps Stalin actually did respect the Finns?

    Soviets never controlled us. They had big influence but lot of its was due our own politics tendency to use that influence to puff up their own carier. Stalin did tryed make things to go in his way in Yugoslavia and here too, like the one he did in Checkoslovakia, but he failed due the fact that he had purged Comitern to near non-existance so there werent no good cardes to make the revolution. After he realised that, he had to adjust to the situation and it didnt prove anyway bad solution after all.

    And you have to remember, our Army trained against possiple NATO invasion coming from the direction of Leningrad so everyone still know how the things really went…;)

    You have to understand that we are small nation between various rivaling power blocks due our entire history, it poses certain limitations to the tools we have in the foreing policies, so that we can keep existing. After WWII this was first time realised by our politics as well. Soviet Union was there, and Russia still is. Its a fact, it wont go away, however unjust it feels and seems. Noble ideas and idea of some sort of morale justice and rigthmindness in diplomacy are priviledges of supernations, rest of us need to medle there as well as we can…and history has proven that national chauvinism and boast are the last two things a nation needs to survive in geo-strategical situation as we are.

    I am surprise by your sense of Cold War nostalgia? Finland was repeated humiliated by the Soviets, and forced to make a huge industrial contribution to the Soviets – without full and adequate compensation.

    Compensation? We attacked into Soviet union in 1941 and placed ethincal Russians in the occupaid Karelia into consentration camps. It was a fair price compared to what the other Nazi allies needed to pay. And the industrial compensations forced us to create heavy industry out of nothing. After the compensations were paid, it freed to contripute our national economy and has been basis of our whealth. I dont see any logic bash it simply becouse it lookalike unequal nature. Like I said, those ideals arent mented to little nations. We have forged a best nation in the face of the earth due the close ties whit huge Soviet Economy, and I dont see nothing wrong in it.

    Gollevainen
    Participant

    Do you really think that a more submissive Finland would have fared better against Stalin?

    Yeas, you would need to know our politics lot better to realise it yourselves. There was no question to any of the Baltic buffer states (Balts, Poland and Us) that there wouldn’t be confrontation in some point agaisnt USSR. We all posessed thread to USSR and we knew it and they knew it. Even back in 1939, I believe that the war would have been avoidaple if we would have given Stalin the few sq land that he demanded….there was too much of concerns in mid-europe that he douptly would have risked war against Us. People buy the mythical david-vs. -Goljat aspect of the winter war and tend to forget that there were strong anti-russian racistic and fasist, Greater-Finland lobby that evetually drove us into Germans pocket. It wasent nessecity but deliberate choice of our government and we payed too big price of it….

    ….and compared to it, we also managed to slip away from our burden of participating Nazis world conquer plans and holocaust pretty unoticed.

    If Finland had conceded to all of Stalins demands without any resistance, it is perfectly likely that Finland would have been entirely absorbed into the Soviet Union, much like the three Baltic states.

    Not in my obinion, thougth the option wasent even question at the time, all of our leaders were completely brainwashed by our own super-race BS and anti-russian racist rumblings… But even if they would have tryed to pull same trick to us as they did with the Balts, we would still put on a figth no matter what the situation would have been….But there would have always been change for peace, And thats worth of deeper thougth.

    It is a great mystery why Stalin allowed Finland to remain independant, albeit neutral?

    Of pure respect. Stalin was humbled by our recistanse. During 1944 only failed allied campaing was Stalins attempt to end the finnish front by massive blow in the same time as the Nordmandian landings. The battles in the Karelian ishtmus were one of the forgotten big battles of WWII(Largest in the Nordic countries and in fact one of the largest of the world by meassure of menpower and tanks.), and it still rank as number one of our military historys miracles. In winter war, we survived mainly due Soviet lack of understanding of modern war and their innability to exploid their superiority. But in 1944 Soviet had learned their leassons from the germans and all credit went to our forces, particularry to Artillery and After it Soviet lose all intress to waste resources to us….

    After the Stalin own purges had ruined his change to make revolution in here, Soviet realised the fact that it was even better to them to have one western democracy as allied as well. A Window to the West as they said. And frankly speaking, the Cold war was one of the best period in finno-russian relations. We both benefitted from the somewhat dodgy relationship, too bad it is all now ruined and the nationalistic bombast begun to lure back into our political rethorics.

    The music was not so bad!!

    Yeas it was:diablo: …many good songs, but ruined with awfull sounds, expecially in the drum section and those keyboard sounds…my god, you could almoust kill incects with it;) :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

    Gollevainen
    Participant

    Russia has always been political card in here…last week, when Putin hold the big press confrence, Our rigthwingers newspaper lurked in and made innocently sounding a question of how Russia would look Finland’s possible NATO card. The answer was quite expectaple, and it has allready turned to behalf of the NATO lobby as well as against it.

    Personally I see little of no use of these sort of weapons in our arsenal, it would only couse limited arms race in the region and would give Russians in the hypothetical confrontation a even more bigger use to use really destructive means to destroy the Hornet fleet. Smaller range missiles and pure antiship missiles along with laser guided bombs and perhaps a HARM capacity is perfectly enough for our Air Forces newly established ground attack arsenal.
    But I do agree, we dont need cold war back in these neighbourhoods,( nor those crappy 80’s drum-machine sounds:p :diablo:), nor do We need to repeat our Russian relations mistakes we made in the 20’s and 30’s that brougth Soviet agression upon us.

    in reply to: General Discussion #329139
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    I’ve bought a Pearl drumset in last autum so my percussion set is almoust complete. The set is a standart four piece with two symbals and a hi-hat. As soon as I get my hand on a digicam, I will post some pics…

    in reply to: What instrument do you play #1937336
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    I’ve bought a Pearl drumset in last autum so my percussion set is almoust complete. The set is a standart four piece with two symbals and a hi-hat. As soon as I get my hand on a digicam, I will post some pics…

    in reply to: China Tests Anti-Satellite Weapon #2526669
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    You’d better open your PC casing as well, more can find there.

    Last time I opened my comp chasing, the bloody thing was tilted for weeks…:mad: 😡 😉

    in reply to: China Tests Anti-Satellite Weapon #2526866
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    Very “convincing” , for someone lives in a country VERY close to Russian and have a very pleasant memory with its giant neighbor in the past. Perhaps Star has to rely on those extreme cases to support his usual ranting

    Nope, only that the usual western BS about russian stuff being cr**p is, well like said BS…

    But I’m very sure you equally can’t count your China stuffs in your daily life, even though China is tens of thousands of Kms away from your hometown.

    Well lets see: (and this is all the stuff found in the armlenght away from my comp) TI-89 calculator, Justler SP-689 multimedia speaker, Logitech mouse and ect. ect, all made in China:diablo: 😉 :p

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 2,664 total)