dark light

Gollevainen

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,306 through 1,320 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Yet another pic request part IV #2082922
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    thanks…You seem to have quite a collection…

    any change of having pr.1256 Topaz “Andryusha” class minesweeper pics? Or any other rare soviet navy pics?

    in reply to: Yet another pic request part IV #2083017
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    thank you, really nice picture indeed. From Northern fleet by judging the back ground…thank you keep em coming…

    in reply to: General Discussion #345066
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    Its very mild in UK at present, can still get away with wearing a T’Shirt

    :rolleyes: :rolleyes: 😡 😡 :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
    I’ll be leaving my application for citizenship first thing in monday…

    It certainly is really mild in the UK at present , I actually did a couple of hours spotting at Gatwick this morning in a polo shirt and jeans.
    I love Finland very much and come to Finland to holiday every second year in a place called Anttola in a log cabin. We always go at the end of September and have only seen the light snow there once.I know it’s gets much heavier after that .
    We are returning to Anttola next March hopefully , so i hope the snow may have gone by then…Nakemiin

    Thats nice to hear, My brother is studying in town of Mikkeli, which Anttola cmuncipality was merged few years back…its lovely area out there really 🙂 🙂

    in reply to: First snow… #1943334
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    Its very mild in UK at present, can still get away with wearing a T’Shirt

    :rolleyes: :rolleyes: 😡 😡 :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
    I’ll be leaving my application for citizenship first thing in monday…

    It certainly is really mild in the UK at present , I actually did a couple of hours spotting at Gatwick this morning in a polo shirt and jeans.
    I love Finland very much and come to Finland to holiday every second year in a place called Anttola in a log cabin. We always go at the end of September and have only seen the light snow there once.I know it’s gets much heavier after that .
    We are returning to Anttola next March hopefully , so i hope the snow may have gone by then…Nakemiin

    Thats nice to hear, My brother is studying in town of Mikkeli, which Anttola cmuncipality was merged few years back…its lovely area out there really 🙂 🙂

    in reply to: Dubya's random musings on random airforces #2536345
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    LOL! That’s because you haven’t had to. America has protected your backside for more than a half century. If you had to defend yourself you wouldn’t know what to do. Of course, France would surrender immediately. Germany would say we can’t fight because of our history. Hell, look at the failure of half of NATO in Afghanistan. French and German troops sit on their ass while Americans, British, and Canadians fight and die. Hell, France talked a big game about leading the Lebanese peacekeeping troops until they actually had to send their troops. They sent a whopping 200 initially. It was only after they were embarrassed on the international scene that they sent more troops. Europe would be in a world of hurt without Great Britain.

    I would love to hear the logic that you use to bark against all europeans that How you have defended us (while in reality you have defended the western half of us and dreathened the eastern part with nukes, including us innocent finns 😎 :rolleyes: 😮 ) and how you then drag the Afganistan into the picture. What sort of defending is taking place in the western occupied nation that should raise concerns about our capapility to defend our selves??? How our lucranty to participate in US military adventures allows some one state that we would be in “a world of Hurt” whitout the some solo nation still enjoying to participate in all sort of nonsense “gee-that-nation-has-oil-lets-liberate-it-from…” hulabaloos…???

    what the history has chosen only is that if USSR (or in fact any russian empire) would have attaced, the europeans would have been able to defend themselves. Or do you have some more enlightening examples of any Russian based european domination from any era?

    Europe needs only us to stay in the guard, it has been so for centuryes and so why bother to change it 😀 😉 😀 😉 :diablo: 😀 😀

    in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084200
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    They had been studying carriers, and they can afford it, considering the pittance that is spent. How much for the Varyag? 20 million? That’s less than a jet fighter.

    Is that the ammount they have spended untill now (prior the system fittings) or the overall cost or your own conclusion made by using the highly effective RAHI method (RAHI= ravistettu hihasta, means threw out of your sleeve 😉 )

    The Varyag languished for years in Dalian, getting new paint, but otherwise its been sitting there. If there has been a firm commitment to carriers, you would see PLANAF pilots being trained on the Kuznetsov under contract since 1999, and Su-33s would have been bought before, then assigned and lent to the Kuznetsov to train these pilots.

    In ideal situation yeas, perhaps …but like in TV series as you mentioned it, things may go wrong, delays, and all sort of little things that can seriously affect to the schedule. It may well be that the chinese decicion to buy Su-33 was after long arm-wrestling between those who wanted some other aircraft (J-10 or domestic naval version from j-11 just for example) The STOBAR with Su-33 has lots of limitations (tough with Varyag, the only solution since there haven’t been any changes to the Ski-jump) so i’m not suprised if chinese would have choosed it after they seeked all other possople alternatives and came to the same conclusion.

    It works well observing most militaries because they tend to be transparent with their roadmaps. Not with the PLA. They don’t say anything about their plans, it’s only when they’re already right on the water can we say, okay they just built a new destroyer, okay they just built a new sub. Since we don’t know what they’re really up to, we only have what in our minds what we think they’re up to. But the problem of this is that it makes it vulnerable to new developments that don’t quite fit to what we expected.

    But I’ve been trying to say that in my obinion the carrier and the new statement of Su-33 purchase fits quite well to my obvesvation of PLAN and it’s direction. The naval expansion of china is clearly going to the road which will end up some sort of bluewater navy with operative carrier(s) as centre of it. We could discuss more of these wider view things, but perhaps in another thread? I’m not just focusing on the events happening just now, but trying to see it in a longer timespan and into the frames of other developments happening in china.

    Things can happen very unexpectedly. What you would have thought they are firmly moving in one direction, they would suddenly stop and moved into another. I can cite many cases of this happening. The halt of Su-30 purchases is an example of massive policy turnaround that no one in the outside world expected, not even the Russians. It was completely out of pattern. I can almost swear that the one constancy in PLA observing is the lack of constancy.

    I agree, there’s always some level of uncertancy…life usually is…But in wider scale, in all three major branch of chinese military, PLA, PLAN and PLAAF the overall idea of the modernisation havne’t been changed or shifted it’s priorities much since it started. With naval issues it’s haven’t been as upfront and straightforward that it could in in threory, but still if you take all the factors that may inflict the development in to opservation, you’ll notice that it still follows the path that was laid upon it.

    So I like to keep these new events under watch. It is certainly most interesting development, it reflects fundamental changes in PLAN doctrine and how they see themselves fitting into the future. But it’s still not set in stone and still open to the sudden “frack it”, and project abandoned.

    It most certainly is and it propaply wont be easy road (tough none never did say it would be) but it’s a road that they have choosen. There maybe some sudden changes, but I hardly think they will effect on the Varyag…it’s just too big to be abandoned. The aircraft carrier will be part of PLAN future someway or another, I can bet anything on it. What is interesting is the decisions and lessons learned after the Varyag is in use. Will the PLAN continue the STOBAR use that have sneaked in the carrier world via backdoor? Or will they see things differently than the sometimes odd russian way of looking the wolrd?

    We just have to wait and see…but what else we are supposed to do :confused: like we have anything better to do :rolleyes: 😉 :diablo:

    in reply to: General Discussion #345443
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    Check the link I put in post 13, it should give you some insight!

    sorry, it made me even more confused?? Guess they didn’t teach us the english nutrital dictionary that well afterall… 😀

    in reply to: The Great Marmite debate!!! #1943466
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    Check the link I put in post 13, it should give you some insight!

    sorry, it made me even more confused?? Guess they didn’t teach us the english nutrital dictionary that well afterall… 😀

    in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084434
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    yeas I know, I pamper them in their own forum, but why rant against it if you know that it will not have any effect??

    in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084452
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    then for Francois5,
    did some chinese kid steal your lunch in school or what is this all about?? :confused: 😉 :confused: If you so much hate chinese and their way of seeing the world, could you step aside and rant somewhere else and leave this thread to those who actually wants to discuss about the topic??? Please, as a humble reguest???

    in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084454
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    To crobato

    I know the tradditions and the subsidoring organistion of the PLA, but like in PLAAF, I belive that the PLAN has been “set free” from the somewhat humiliating role of simply supporting the army’s movement in land and defending the coastal areas. I belive this happened bit earlier than it did with the PLAAF (after first gulf war) as the expansion of PLAN started around late 80’s.

    I’m not saying that there is no different “schools” in PLAN, all maor and even smaller navies have them. But I think none of those schools can just go and buy stuff with out central planning. Aquiring carrier and pursuing carrier operations is not just any regular equipment bought for trialling purposes. The volume of it in all aspects is so huge that it simply cannot be just some school’s way of proofing them to be right. I agree you with that there mighht have been some changes in the PLAN leadership and some of them wishes to see subs more than carriers, but the decision of aquiring carrier is made earlier and it’s affects to the PLAN will be so dramatical that it’s most definetly the main single factor that dominates all PLAN future plannings and organisation changes.

    To me the carrier plans are all but in a hold, or have been. Like I said the incorporating a carrier to your fleet is so big change, that exspecially in the chinese case it will inflict all doctrines and shipdevelopment plans. And that takes time. For example Soviets started to dream about carriers as early as late 20’s but it was in the very last year of that regime (1991) when a true fixed wing carrier was completed. It’s evident that the chinese were pursuing carriers for long period now, to my recall it was started when that same “forget-his-name” Admiral, a student and fan of the Admiral Gorshkov himself became to power (remembering it being in the 80’s). Even if he now would have been replaced, it’s clearly seen that the carrier plans are not being halted, but infact being steaming forward all along. You mentioned the first talks about Su-33 in 1997, but that could be seen as a “door-opener” to further talks. Remember, the Varyag was purchased in next year and the work to make it a operational started in 2002.

    in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084536
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    I don’t really think there is a big pro-carrier faction in China. Many think its still a waste of money and that opinion may be shared by factions within the PLAN, the CMC and the CCP leadership. This is a country that remains traditionally bound to the concepts of a continental power.

    PLAN has been in an internal battle between the squids and the seagull factions. The seagulls had control of the PLAN in the 90s but in this decade, the squids have been dominating. There appears only enough support to do a serious trial and tryout of a carrier, but not enough to commit to 3 or 4. Frankly for the seagulls to go this far is a pleasant surprise.

    Getting the Varyag to run and operate as a trial carrier, then put some planes on it, to demonstrate the feasibility and advantages of carrier operation, this is more of a demonstration to the PLA and the main party leadership than to the outside world that the concept is viable. Once that obstacle is past, then maybe you can see a second or a third carrier, but that’s way down the line.

    I have to disagree with you on this little bit. I think even china now see it’s navy as a whole and the expansion of it clearly indicates to moving towards more complex and mature naval power that it previously has been. The carrier is just normal step ahead. Although china seems to have quite alot money preserved to the naval expansion, i doupt they could afoard to give huge ammount of funds to “some admirals” being able to proof their ideas to be right. Aircraft carriers are normally (only exception was our dear neighbours, soviets) the centre of the fleets and all the organisations are going to be build around it. China is clearly showing indications that it will follow this path. So I’m pretty sure the chinese are full hearted with this carrier aqustion and it’s being the top priority.

    in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2085195
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    well offcourse it is the case with all prognosis but my point was that the current generation is rather obsolete when the PLAN is mature enough carrier operator to protect power…..but UCAV will be smaller and big carrier can take more of them onboard 😀 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #345530
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    What is marmite :confused: :confused: ….seccond cousin to marmelade?? 😎 :confused:

    in reply to: The Great Marmite debate!!! #1943501
    Gollevainen
    Participant

    What is marmite :confused: :confused: ….seccond cousin to marmelade?? 😎 :confused:

Viewing 15 posts - 1,306 through 1,320 (of 2,664 total)