dark light

xtangomike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 428 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Deep aircraft excavations #1134845
    xtangomike
    Participant

    [Are there health and safety restrictions placed on such digs to govern the max depth, width or other dimensions. I guess the ground conditions in Kent being clay, chalk or Thanet sand and gravel provide a stable strata within which to dig, but those shots with the 2 diggers together make me wonder whether such a depth is permitted today without shoring the sides.[/QUOTE]

    I don’t think I can remember a dig where we seriously ‘shored up the sides’.(only if your dig was on telly in the middle of London)
    Digging for ‘gold’ can be bl..dy dangerous, a bit like rock climbing!! But when there is a scent of a good dig, the adrenalin rises, and nothing is too dangerous.
    I look back today and realise that 40ft down the hole, on a ramped in digger bucket, with water seeping through the clay walls and the sides visably moving in (Kowsloski & Buckner)…well, a tad squeaky…but that’s what it was all about. The rewards were always worth it.
    Today, however, with our mamby pamby health and safety jobsworthy brigade around…well…I’m glad I’ve done my digs..not many left over here anyways. No one was ever killed, hurt or whatever, but to be PC I must warn newcomers that digging wartime aircraft must be lawfull, and treated with the utmost care for the safety of all concerned, especially when finding big old heavy 500 pounders.

    in reply to: Anyone know anything about Plane Heritage, Goodwood? #1134848
    xtangomike
    Participant

    I know someone who gave a flight and had no return…at all……….

    Seriously though, I used to know those Tiger Moth guys very well at G/wood.
    At one time they operated under the Mithral racing banner, but I have not been in touch for some time.
    Your best bet would be to call Goodwood control, and ask the question !!
    I think they have simply relocated and your question could be answered at the airfield.

    in reply to: Deep aircraft excavations #1134856
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Steve Vizrard excavated a very deep 109 on the Isle of Wight –

    Here are some pics of the Isle of Wight ‘109’ dig with Steve Vizard, Andy S, myself and others. The 109 had hit plumb centre, an old well and supposedly buried itself down the small 4ft shaft. We found a 20m cannon buried vertically alongside the shaft, which proved the position of the engine/fusalage…we thought!
    So down we went, and over a period of about 6/7 weekends, we dug downwards and then ramped in from the side.
    God knows what it finally cost, but you can see the two machines in use, and on reaching probably near 60ft, we found….nothing..I mean nothing… except a small piece of molten aluminium, and lots of old leaves and broken tree branches….
    Some you win and some you l……..!!!!!!!!

    in reply to: Control Column Tops – Identification? #1136222
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Thank you Xtango….:D

    Anyway, changed my mind about the yellow toy Spitfire. It looks too heavy to hang on cotton from the bedroom ceiling and Mrs Tangmere didn’t like the colour.

    “We can always change the colour for you sir! we aim to please all our customers”. Part X’s welcome”

    in reply to: Look what I found outside Wetherspoons #1136226
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Found this today outside Wetherspoons in Wigan

    Down our way, it’s ‘Buy one get one free’………….

    in reply to: Battle of Britain BBC2 last night #1136273
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Full marks to James Holland and BBC 2 for probably the best and most accurate assessment of the air battles of 1940.
    It was very pleasing to hear genuine and unbiased comment, plus the accuracy of detail of the strategy of both sides, together with informed opinion on opposing aircraft performances.
    The real history and usage of radar on both sides was new to me, and the detail of the Kriegsmarine S boats in concurrance with the air battle was something not widely known.
    In all, the program offered one of the best insights to the overall picture of the B of B, without all the usual celebraties and cliches which have almost been overkill during the past few weeks.

    in reply to: Control Column Tops – Identification? #1137003
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Thank you, Bananasplits!

    You are quite right. A closer look reveals it is indeed 8005.

    Thanks for the i/d on the second one, too!

    Cor blimey mate!!!!! good job is was an 8 Andy, or your journey might have been in vain, especially with a pupil’s stick for second place…..

    Any old Bedford parts goin’ cheap? Could help you identify a few old chassis numbers…especially if they need ‘tweaking’.

    in reply to: A ' One Off ' #1138284
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Excellent!

    With those dimensions it will fit nicely into one of those special mailing boxes you can buy at the Post Office. I think you need size “H”.

    You know my address!

    😀

    We are talking ‘aeroplanes’ here Andy !!!!!!

    in reply to: A ' One Off ' #1138536
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Very nice, especially condition and finish! What is its size, span etc?

    I have an equivalent Fairey Gannet AEW model which seems to be mohogany (painted over), it needs some repair work though.
    I’ve often wondered about the who has handled this aspect!

    Wingspan…18″ LOA….16″

    in reply to: A ' One Off ' #1139478
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Ssshh….nobody’s missed it yet…I’ll have a replacement by the morning !!!

    in reply to: Elector Seats #1098371
    xtangomike
    Participant

    EN 830, pm me about ejector seat(s). I may be able to help.

    in reply to: Wyvern rear fuselage.. where is it.? #1100050
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Hey Andy, I know why there was nothing found at our last attempt on the dig….we had a large work party from Ford open prison working for us if you remember, and that may be the answer to all the queeries about ‘parts’. They had a van too…never checked that out did we ?
    Mind you, from memories of prison vans, there would not have been enough room for a Python.
    Te-heeeeeeeeee

    in reply to: SWWAPS, Lasham #1107081
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Lasham today. I like the ‘Handle with care’ pic. Should have been on the Drover !!!!! (I hear that she could be bought…???)

    in reply to: Help needed for identification #1094686
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Thanks for the replies,all very helpfull. I have a ‘shedfull’ of articles which I am working through, so will be posting some more ‘mysteries’ quite soon.
    Actually someone might recognise these bomb fins !! Very odd finds.

    in reply to: Help needed for identification #1095299
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Any radio buffs about ?

    I’m told this is WW11 bomber radio….. plus a few instruments.
    Can anyone confirm ?

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 428 total)