dark light

xtangomike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 428 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Should crash sites be disturbed?? #1248467
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Interesting as the pile of wreckage may seem, its been talked over untill that post got locked so it water under the bridge, lets be honist boys there is nothing in 1940 that could not be remade today, all we have is something of historic interest and a dataplate to save the builder a few quid.

    Lets be honist how many WW2 planes are origional and still flying, my guess is very few, just look at willys jeeps there are proberly more new builds sold as genuine 1940s but more like 2 year old that the real thing on the road

    Now there’s a man speaking a lot of sense and reality 😉

    in reply to: Should crash sites be disturbed?? #1248780
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Ferguson potato ridger

    Hi Adrian

    Unfortunately the person who could give you the details of the ridger is ‘unavailable’ for comment on this forum at the moment.
    I myself was once the proud owner of a very respectable ‘grey’ Ferguson tractor. However no offence intended or taken.

    I also have reserves about the final outcome of 764, but at least the recovery has made available the possibility of a rebuild. Secrecy in the early days of a historic rebuild is such that I have no knowlege as to the present whereabouts and furtherance of the project. Nevertheless we can wait and hope.

    in reply to: Brian Brown Memorial #1248966
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Brian Brown

    Our thanks go to Brian Brown for all the pleasure and enjoyment of seeing his flying displays in varied types of aeroplanes both live and on the screen over the past years.

    It’s pilots like Brian who give us all the thrill of seeing vintage aircraft flown and displayed in the way we dream of.

    Who can forget G-HURRI in her black livery last year.
    Just amazing !!

    Thank you Brian.

    in reply to: Should crash sites be disturbed?? #1248972
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Recovered from a dig

    I put these pics on the ‘Spitfire pictures’ post but have had a couple of sneering replies about ‘junk and scrap metal’ together with farm machinery ect.

    I suppose some people think that all the flying Spitfires were delivered whole and flyable, but most of us know that many of them started from scrap yards, fire dumps, playgrounds ect.

    MA 764 is probably one of the most complete Spitfire digs ever, certainly as far as the firewall, cockpit, and a small area of fusalage behind the cockpit is concerned.

    Even though there was some anguish amongst the recovery team to start with, this one was not taken away and broken up into collectors bits and pieces. It was all kept together and will, I’m told, form the basis for a new aeroplane in the years to come.

    If that happens, then it will show what can be achieved by recoveries carried out with a mind to preserve and show the aeroplane to this and the next generation.

    xtangomike
    Participant

    Missing Spitfire

    This is a recovered Spitfire Mk9 MA764 recovered in France.
    I am told it will be or is being rebuilt to fly and is seen here post recovery with the wife of its previous ‘owner’ Fl.Sgt Don Bostok.

    Perhaps those who want to know what happens to artefacts recovered from crash site should ponder on this.

    in reply to: Should crash sites be disturbed?? #1251705
    xtangomike
    Participant

    To recover or not recover !

    A fascinating thread, bearing in mind that there has been a recent recovery operation taking place over the last couple of weeks at Gravesend.

    I have been involved in many digs over the last thirty odd years to recover researched aircraft and display those parts together with their history, in museums around the Southern half of England. The whole idea was to preserve their history whilst eye witnesses were still alive to point us in the general direction of a site. The enjoyment of the hobby has always been the search and eventual recovery of items that had a history and could be displayed and explained to future generations.

    I will accept that a recovery will spawn an excess of bits and pieces that will fall into the hands of those who do not preserve them. However many bits are kept in private hands for the owner’s enjoyment, no different to any other ‘collecting’ hobby.
    If you leave them underground, who is to police their eventual recovery and distribution in the future?

    The difficulties of a recovery are borne out by the Eric William’s Hurricane at Gravesend. Here we have a situation of a known site for sixty seven years which contained the body of a dead airman. The site is to be built over eventually, and time and conditions made it essential for the recovery to be undertaken as soon as possible.

    Two attempts at recovery have failed for one reason or another. Should another try be undertaken, or should we wash our hands and forget about it ?? I think not. It seems to me that some people think we are ghouls and body snatchers for wanting our nation’s war dead to be recovered and buried with honour and dignity. All of us who are prepared to speak our minds and spend precious time researching and finding fallen airman, do so with humble hearts and serious minds so as to show our respect and thanks to those who gave their lives for our future.

    I would like to know what words in the suspended thread brought about the pressure from whom, to our webmaster, for him to kill off the discussions and free speech on this website.

    in reply to: Messerschmitt 108 survivors #1262306
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Oooops!! sorry, big mistake. I had a feeling……… as one does. Should have checked first.

    in reply to: Hurricane crash at Shoreham Airshow #1262502
    xtangomike
    Participant

    How very sad and tragic to lose such an aircraft and its pilot on such a day.

    Sincere condolences to all the family and friends.

    in reply to: Luftwaffe Officer Franz Brandl #1246639
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Franz Brandl

    Thanks Dave, Fantastic site
    Cheers
    Peter

    in reply to: New book new Hurricane to fly ? #1250590
    xtangomike
    Participant

    R for Robert

    R for Robert Hurricane P2902. R-DX
    Built as one of the first production batch of 500 aircraft built by the Gloster Aircraft Co.Ltd, Brockworth during 1939/40 under contract no 962371/38/c.23a. Fitted with Merlin 111 and Rotol three blade propeller. First flight in Oct 1939 and by May 1940 was operational with 245 Sqd. at Drem. and coded
    R-DX.
    Relocated to Hawkinge 28th May 1940 and flown by P.O. McGlashan over Dunkirk on his first operational sortie on the 29th.
    On 31st Of May, having returned to Kenley the previous day, the entire squadron of twelve aircraft were scrambled at midday to engage German bomber activity over Dunkirk. During a fierce engagement with Me 109’s, McGlashan was hit in the thigh and the aircraft severely damaged. After a vertical dive from 25,000 ft, McGlashan force landed,wheels up, on the beach near the Belgian border. He returned to England after an eventfull journey aboard a paddle steamer.

    Further details available on request.
    Peter

    in reply to: Earliest Aviation Memory #1268116
    xtangomike
    Participant

    What started it all!!

    The first ‘live’ aircraft I saw close up was either a Hurricane or Battle parked at the entrance of Churchers College, Petersfield in 1947/8. I rember it’s 3 blade prop, and Merlin type exhausts. No wings, and painted in camouflage green and brown. My vague recollection was more perspex behind the front screen than usual, so I have to lean towards a Battle or Fulmer.
    It was removed soon after, and I have never been able to find anyone who can positively identify its type.
    Anyone out there who could solve the puzzle ?

    in reply to: Catalina forced landing Carlisle 15th June #1272570
    xtangomike
    Participant

    ‘Forced landing’

    The correct pilot’s wording for this landing would be a ‘precautionary landing’.
    If the aircraft was unable to maintain normal flying attitudes the pilot would have to decare a ’emergancy’, and force land the aircraft wherever as soon as possible.
    In this case, the pilot would asses that to continue on one engine was feasable, but increased the danger to the aircraft and all persons aboard if the second engine should fail. He would therefore take the decision to land at the nearest arfield or safe landing ground as a precautionary landing.

    in reply to: Duxford DH9 #1328748
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Absolutely Andy.My thinking exactly.

    in reply to: Duxford DH9 #1329439
    xtangomike
    Participant

    DH9 unveiling

    I am somewhat surprised( although I shouldn’t be), at the sniping comments made by a small number of members when a ‘new’ treasured icon of our flying heritage is unveiled to the world of historic aviation.
    The words ‘replica’, sums of money and ‘swaps’ are all in the dictionary of historic aircraft recoveries and rebuilds.
    How many members would dearly love to be involved in the sharp end of these now rare discoveries and rebuilds. Let us not forget the months, or even years of work and frustration, in just locating and rescuing these icons, let alone the fastidious and expensive craftsmanship required to produce such perfection .
    I, and many others, are eternally grateful to those people, wealthy and dedicated , or just dedicated, who produce the cockpit rebuilds, the static exhibits and the flying icons for us and future generations, to admire.
    Well done to all involved in this latest treasure.
    May the flying one be with us soon. Then the keyboard tappers will have some more to say.

    in reply to: Sad news – Neville Duke is with us no more #1247948
    xtangomike
    Participant

    Flying with Neville Duke

    You have a good memory Andy,

    I was privileged to have Neville in the right hand seat of my Koliber (Polish copy of French Rally 150hp) on a short demo flight at Goodwood in the late 1980’s. He was fascinated with the STOL performance of the a/c and he, having experienced some testing of the Optica at Old Sarum, was amused by the Koliber ‘landing over the hedge’ approach of 45 knts, with full 3 stage flap, power on and nose up, to then touch down and roll to a braked stop in under 50 yards.
    He declined to ‘have a go’ himself, saying with a wry grin, that he doubted if he could better that himself.
    As always, the gentleman, generous with his words, and one who would never attempt to undermine or outdo someone else’s achievements.
    Sadly missed, but brilliant memories.
    Peter D

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 428 total)