dark light

Charlie Echo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 234 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #367315
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    His cooking shows are both interesting and fun to watch. If he can also inspire young folks to cook and eat better then hats off. By the way, he isn’t exactly an unknown in NA.
    Sauron

    100% agreed. He’s also known here in SA, although only by cable TV.

    in reply to: Story about Russia moving Iraqi WMD to Syria #2048765
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    With stagnating industry, increasing unemployment level, Gewerkschaften screaming for even less working time and expensive Euro, Germany is rolling down a hill. Pretty sad for a so-said leader of the EU.

    That’s pretty dangerous, if you recall the Republic of Weimar, isn’t it? :diablo:

    in reply to: The less than famous loosers…. #2631758
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Hmm. I guess the YC-15 actually managed to fly – I once saw a picture of a YC-15 doing some turbofan tests. Unfortunately I don´t have the pic here. IIRC, the C-17 was a development on the YC-15.

    in reply to: Australian JSF, what's going wrong? #2631899
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Hammer,
    The US Army is buying the ACS with a Embraer platform. At same time, the Russians were putting an embargo to Brazilian chicken and beef, without any justifiable reasons.

    So I don’t think that either the USA are that bad, or the Russian are that good, contrary to what many people here in Brazil like to think.

    in reply to: New Brazilian-made submarine Tikuna #2058262
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Some pics of the comissioning: President Lula and the S-34 Tikuna, the fifth submarine of the Brazilian Navy.

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/marinha/tikuna3/tikuna.jpg

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/marinha/tikuna3/tikuna1.jpg

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/marinha/tikuna3/tikuna6.jpg

    in reply to: AMX vs Harrier for usefulness in a carrier #2636768
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Kovy said something about the French Crusaders in the Navy Forum (topic “Rafale on Foch”):

    lol, Come on ! they are 40 years old aircrafts that have suffered years of carrier stress (expecially carrier landing and salt atmosphere)
    The french navy first plan was to retire them in 1977…Thanks to new wings and some structural tests, they were able to postpone the date until 1993. And finally they kept them until 1999 which was the ultimate date possible for safety reasons : The french lost 27 of their 42 F-8 during their 35 years of operational service.

    You still want French F-8 ?
    Take them, the navy asks 1 euro for each airframe and I’m sure they will give you a few etendard IV for free :

    There´s a picture of the boneyard:

    http://jetart.free.fr/image-avion/cruze-landi.jpg

    these are all the french F-8 left, the rest is in museums
    Caption of the picture: these are all the french F-8 left, the rest is in museums

    in reply to: AMX vs Harrier for usefulness in a carrier #2637730
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Soa como você gostaria de requisitar seu hamburger em ‘Hooters’ em vez de McDonalds

    Wow! Perfect Portuguese! Congrats!

    Regarding the Hooters, I didn´t know about that one, thanks for the heads up. Unfortunately, the only Brazilian store is 400 km away from me, as Google told me:
    Name & Phone Address
    Hooters of Sao Paulo
    011-55-11-5181-3922 Rua Jose Guerra 111
    Sao Paulo 😀

    Can’t understand why Brazil would not cooperate with India on both a new carrier and naval version of LCA.

    Lots of people talk about this here in Brazil: a cooperation between Brazil/India or the famous “B-R-I-C” bloc (Brazil Russia India China). It would be a way to share technology and money, without being harassed by others. Of course, it´s still far from reality…

    in reply to: General Discussion #371526
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    I expect we´ll see a great, entertaining season, differently from previous years.

    in reply to: F-15K 1st Flight #2637850
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Isn´t Bars a PESA device?

    in reply to: AMX vs Harrier for usefulness in a carrier #2637852
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    obigrado Senhor Echo! Eu amo mulheres de Brasil! :diablo:

    Eu também, exceto pelas garotas do McDonald´s. You should hire hotter waitresses for McDonald´s – or maybe put some smaller clothes, you know… :dev2: :p :dev2:

    in reply to: New Brazilian-made submarine Tikuna #2058597
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Some previous pictures from October 2004, when the main parts were being assembled:

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/marinha/tikuna/img7.jpg

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/marinha/tikuna/img9.jpg

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/marinha/tikuna/img10.jpg

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/marinha/tikuna/img12.jpg

    in reply to: AMX vs Harrier for usefulness in a carrier #2638817
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    But MiG-29K is a STOBAR naval fighter, and A-12 Sao Paulo operates CATOBAR aircraft. Hence, either the MiG-29K would have to be adapted for catapult lauch OR the carrier would have to receive a ski jump. This kind of adaptation is often too expensive to be practical. Nevertheless, there were some “mini ski-jumps tested on Foch for the Rafale, but I don’t know if those ones could be useful for a MiG-29K.

    in reply to: River operations questions #2058711
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    About Brazilian river patrol boats (in Portuguese)

    http://www.infomarmb.hpg.ig.com.br/patrulha.html

    Three classes, five ships:

    02 “Pedro Teixeira class”, pic below

    02 “Roraima” class

    01 “Paranaiba” monitor

    http://www.infomarmb.hpg.ig.com.br/PedrotFoto.jpg

    There are more pics in the limk.

    in reply to: AMX vs Harrier for usefulness in a carrier #2639723
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    What about surplus A-7Es? The United States sold some recently to Thailand’s Navy,and while these aren’t deployed on a carrier,they would make a good replacement for the A-4s,as thats what the US Navy replaced its A-4s with.As a 2nd option I’d go with the Naval AMX,sounds like a good idea to me,probbley make a decent little attack bird and who knows,maybe Brazil could talk Italy into producing some on their AMX line to replace or complament their AV-8B Harrier IIs.If they did this,it would off set some of the costs of just one country producing a special version.

    The Corsair II would be a good mud mover, but the carrier group needs an outer protection screen in the form of air defense fighters. Hence, the chosen platform would have to be a multirole fighter.

    Multiroles: A-4, F/A-18A/C, Harrier, or the “Goshawk 200”. In the Naval Forum, someone posted some data about Sao Paulo´s catapults and lifts: they could handle a Hornet (A/C) without its full load. The Subpar Hornet is out of question, as is a fully loaded regular Hornet.

    *** Since the Brazilian military has cancelled a much more needed program – the FX, needed to protect Brazilian airspace and acquire technology – I seriously doubt that the Navy would be allowed to get new-built fighters, such as a AMX-N or Goshawk. So, it could be an upgraded A-4 or an used Hornet.

    in reply to: AMX vs Harrier for usefulness in a carrier #2639728
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    “All in all, the sole existance of the carrier is matter of a lot of discussion. So, I guess the Navy won´t put any serious money on it. OTOH, wothout money the thing more and more a white elephant. There you have your fabulous “vicious circle”…”

    Sorry, but you are wrong, our navy knows very well the importance of an aircraft carrier. The problem is our stupid press!!!
    The A-12 São Paulo will be upgraded with new sistems, radars, CIWS(Bofors Trinity?) and SAMs(Aspide 2000?). 🙂

    regards,
    Adelphi

    If one thinks about the Barroso corvette or Tikuna submarine “sagas” or about the decomissioning of Type 22 and Garcia frigates, he´d say that´s very very very optimistic view.

    I´m pretty frank about this one: the only usefulness of A-12 Sao Paulo is to preserve the capability and know-how to operate carriers. It´s not a operational combat machine, and it won´t be in the short-medium term. It was cheap to buy, USD 12 millions, but is way beyond the logistic and budgetary capability of the Navy.

    And that´s a pretty expensive manner to preserve potential capabilities.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 234 total)