dark light

Charlie Echo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 234 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: AMX vs Harrier for usefulness in a carrier #2639730
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Carlos, I didn’t know you were Brazilian, all this time I thought you were British! Lets talk in Portuguese some time, I’m bad but decent 🙂

    Cheers, Senhor McDonald! Você está autorizado a escrever em português aqui quando quiser! Don´t worry about quality, since my English isn´t that perfect either! 🙂

    in reply to: AMX vs Harrier for usefulness in a carrier #2640245
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Navalizing the AMX would be awfully expensive, and there are serious doubts if that underpowered bird could be launched with any kind of useful fuel of weapons load. Re-engining wouldn´t be cost-effective either.

    Although the Harrier doesn´t sound bad, the most likely thing to happen is some kind of A-4 upgrade. Without major alterations, a Harrier woulnd´t benefit from the catapults, and wouldn´t have a ski-jump to take off with a better load.

    All in all, the sole existance of the carrier is matter of a lot of discussion. So, I guess the Navy won´t put any serious money on it. OTOH, wothout money the thing more and more a white elephant. There you have your fabulous “vicious circle”… 😉

    in reply to: It's QUIZ-mas time… #2640549
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    The country i was still waiting for was the US, obviously because of the USS Stark which was hit by one of Iraq’s leased Sues.

    I guess USS Stark was hit by a Exocet from a Mirage F.1EQ:

    http://www.acig.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2536

    http://www.acig.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=377

    (as King Jester has already observed)

    in reply to: Fighter Aircraft Generation: Classfications #2641609
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    I completely agree with Distiller. That’s the way I used to understand it, although I couldn’t express it this way.

    in reply to: Fighter Aircraft Generation: Classfications #2642083
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    I understand the 4th generation as having digital avionics and swing-role capability from the start. The Gripen is considered the first operational 4thGen fighter because he was built from scratch thinking about these elements.

    The 3rd Gen (MiG-23 up to 29, F-14 up to F-18C) had analog data and were either “not a pound for air-to-ground” or “fighterbombers w/ limited A-to-A capability”.

    in reply to: Brazil's govt cancels tender for 12 new fighter jets #2642696
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Currently we are in the middle of a reasonable updete of the F-5 fleet of courese the AMX could never be considered a true air defence fighter but the italian aircraft are capable of shooting AIM-9 sidewinders wich is similar to what the current F-5s can accomplish. Instead of purchasing Used F-16s we should get more F-5 and grow the number of airgraft involved in the F-5BR program, seting some aircraft to protect the nations capital. If we go to the F-16s there will be a great pressure NOT TO BUY ANY NEW FIGHTER AT ALL. And Brazil’s entry into the elite of fighter operators will be delayed some 20 more years into the future. 😡

    But the AIM-9 capability doesn’t make it a viable air defense fighter – the A-10 Thunderbolt II has Sidewinder capability too, for example. Brazil lacks air defense in the form of BVR-capable fighters, and not tactical fighter-bombers like AMX. IMHO, the A-1M upgrade will suffice, if it adds PGM and AShM capability to the already existing AMXs.

    Sens, most of what you wrote makes “sense” (sorry, I couldn’t resist 😀 ), except for the part of the Lula promise. As Hammer said, he was as total pro-Embraer/Mirage freak in the pre-election period. Only after he came to power, he started to postpone the FX, supposedly “saving money for the Hunger Zero Program”

    in reply to: Brazil's govt cancels tender for 12 new fighter jets #2643037
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    I´m against buying de refurbished F-16 we should instead buy the mothballed AMXs from Italy.

    I disagree. The AMX has NO credible air-to-air capability. The next Brazilian fighter must be multirole, and that’s impossible for AMX.

    With the 45 AMXs we have I think thats enough to make anti-ship raids

    That’s it.

    in reply to: Venezuela buys weapons from Brazil #2653177
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    New York Times

    Arms Buying by Venezuela Worries U.S.
    By JUAN FORERO

    Published: February 15, 2005

    BOGOTÁ, Colombia, Feb. 14 – President Hugo Chávez’s government is moving toward purchasing combat planes from Brazil, the latest step in what the Bush administration has cast as a worrisome arms buildup by the left-leaning government in an already tumultuous region.

    Meeting in Caracas, the Venezuelan capital, on Monday, Mr. Chávez and his Brazilian counterpart, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, signed agreements establishing a strategic, economic and military alliance between the nations.

    Though the deal is not yet sealed, Venezuela is negotiating to buy as many as 24 Super Tucano multipurpose combat aircraft from the giant Brazilian aircraft manufacturer Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica, known as Embraer. The deal would be worth $170 million, according to the Brazilian newspaper O Globo.

    The two countries also signed energy and mining accords that permit Brazil’s oil and gas company, Petrobras, to develop offshore natural gas projects and oil fields in Venezuela’s lucrative Orinoco heavy oil belt. Trade between the governments doubled to $1.6 billion in 2004 from the year before and could reach $3 billion this year, a development that Mr. Chávez celebrated as a sign of Latin American integration at the expense of the United States.

    “We are totally and absolutely convinced in Venezuela that the solution to our problems is not in the north, but here between us,” Mr. Chávez told reporters on Monday.

    But it is Venezuela’s procurement of high-tech military hardware that has raised eyebrows among American policy makers and officials here in Colombia, which shares a porous and violent 1,400-mile border with Venezuela.

    Mr. Chávez’s government has been shopping to modernize its poorly armed 100,000-member military. The Venezuelans have agreed to buy at least 10 military helicopters from Russia and 100,000 assault rifles. Venezuela is also considering updating its air force with Russian MIG’s.

    The Bush administration, which has been in an increasingly tense war of words since tacitly supporting a brief coup against Mr. Chávez in 2002, has warned that the arms purchases could benefit “irregular groups,” meaning Marxist rebels in neighboring Colombia.

    “We have serious concerns about how Venezuela will secure these armaments and the thousands of rifles they will replace,” Adam Ereli, a State Department spokesman, said Thursday.

    Mr. Chávez has reacted angrily to the criticism, saying that Venezuela has the right to purchase arms from any suitable seller and that the United States lacks the moral heft to question the arms sales.

    “They sold weapons to Saddam Hussein, and they armed Al Qaeda, but the serpent turned against them,” Mr. Chávez said. The president has also accused the United States of delaying supplies of spare parts for Venezuela’s aging fleet of F-16 fighters.

    The comments signal increasingly tense relations between the countries, which are bound economically because of Venezuela’s role as one of the four top providers of oil to the United States.

    In recent weeks, Bush administration officials as senior as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have criticized Mr. Chávez’s governing style.

    Mr. Chávez, recently warning of the possibility of an American invasion, has responded by announcing plans to expand so-called popular defense units, a sort of citizen militia, as well as the country’s military reserves.

    “Popular defense units should be born, units of different sizes – 10 people, 100 people, 500 people,” Mr. Chávez said in a speech.

    His costly military plans – they would be worth hundreds of millions of dollars if fully pursued – raise questions about Venezuela’s ability to continue with a significant expansion of social spending aimed at lifting people out of poverty.

    “There is a case to be made that the Venezuelan military needed to be upgraded, but the timing of this is what concerns the Colombians and raises questions about his commitment to his social agenda,” said Miguel Díaz, a senior analyst who tracks Venezuela at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

    Military analysts who study the region, however, say Venezuela’s desire to buy Brazilian fighters may make sense, since both Venezuela and Brazil are increasingly interested in cooperating to patrol the Amazon. Drug traffickers move cocaine throughout that jungle zone and Colombian armed groups hide in the region’s borders.

    Luis Bittencourt, a Brazilian analyst, said the Super Tucano, a turbo-prop plane, would be an ideal aircraft for patrolling Venezuela’s jungle regions.

    “They fly well at low altitude, at low speed, and have wonderful maneuverability and they have good range, without using much fuel,” said Mr. Bittencourt, director of the Brazil project at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington. “They allow you to identify the enemy, or whatever it is you might be looking for, that are using the forest as cover.”

    Brian Ellsworth contributed reporting from Caracas for this article.

    in reply to: The UK and the Argentine Situation #2653401
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Phil wrote: “Britains claim is based on international law and the wishes of the population”

    Wow, so if the entire south american population’s wishes are to take back the Falklands, can we claim the same thing?

    Ignorance is truely bliss.

    Obviously Phil was refering to the Falklands population, I guess you failed miserably to notice that.

    I’m all for a dictatorship. Democracy hasn’t given us anything.

    You can live in Cuba or North Korea if you don´t like democracy. Or maybe China, if you prefer right-wing, since they seem to have changed sides. Do you think you would write things freely in a public forum if the dictatorship-of-your-dreams came true? Give me a break. 😡

    in reply to: Scorpene accident #2061941
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Same from DCN (manufacturer):

    Sous-marin de type Scorpène « O’Higgins » : point sur les essais
    Paris, le 12 janvier 2005

    Le phénomène dit de remontée en feuille morte arrivé le 1er novembre sur le sous-marin O’Higgins pendant ses essais est un phénomène physique bien connu, prévisible, sur tous les sous-marins dans le monde.
    Il est intervenu dans les conditions limites d’essais dans lesquelles le sous marin évoluait à ce moment-là. A cette occasion le sous-marin O’Higgins, premier du type Scorpène, a confirmé son excellent comportement à la mer.

    Il poursuit actuellement ses essais, conformément au planning convenu et à l’entière satisfaction de DCN et son partenaire IZAR, et de notre client la marine chilienne.

    in reply to: General Discussion #388169
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    He went off to join U2 😀 and the Chili’s recruited Dave Navarro from Jane’s Addiction for the career low that was ‘One Hot Minute’. ‘Californication ‘and ‘By The Way’ are seriously good records though.

    As for seeing them live… that picture was taken through the blurry haze of the all day festival “Gig on the Green” at Glasgow Green in August 2003. Also on the bill were Queens of the Stone Age, PJ Harvey and The Foo Fighters.

    I think I’ve only ever seen them in Glasgow come to think of it ?

    I’m a great fan of RHCP, and completely agree with that. One Hot Minute was their worst album, but both Californication and By The Way were superb.

    And yes, I used to listen to their early records, specially Mother’s Milk. But I don’t think they got worse with time, but different. The bands are in constant mutation. Compare Beatles 1962 vs 69 or Stones 65 vs 71, or even U2 83 vs. 89 or 96…

    I have to say Flood has a point about the yachts and stuff. But that’s not necessarily bad.

    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    The Su-33 has a MTOW of 33 tons… how is that not a decent load or weapons or fuel for a fighter? (That is 3 tons more than the Su-27SK export version of the standard Su-27.)

    But is this MTOW for a ski-ramp take off, from the carrier? Looks like that’s the number for a take off from the ground

    in reply to: To SMT or not to SMT ? that is "the question" #2628307
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    No, the country that has a MiG-29 fleet is Peru, not Venezuela.

    BTW, nice job, Camaro, regarding the info about the Brazilian newspaper. There was a couple of contradictions in that article, and it was written by a reporter that suffers from “severe chronic lack of credibility” 😀 :dev2:

    Anyway, it’s IMHO the best newspaper in my country – ironicly, the one that has the biggest credibility.

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2628448
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    That’s alright, mate! That’s an interisting theory, I didn’t know about it, thanks! It seems as a “combined” theory would be also not bad (Fabric igniting H2) 🙂

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2628474
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    What about the dramatic burning of the Hindenburg being due to the leak of helium gas? I saw a thing on TV where they argued that the cause was the result of stuff they used to coat the outer surface of the dirigible.

    Memory of that is misty though, so maybe I got it wrong.

    Didn´t know about the coating, but anyway the original tale says it exploded because of Hidrogen, not Helium. This one is used nowadays instead of the H2 exactly because it´s inert and therefore impossible to explode. 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 234 total)