dark light

Charlie Echo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 234 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Argentine warship fires on Brazil ship #2065314
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    I would suggest you to put some ironic or joking smiley next to your last statement, to avoid starting any kind of flame war. 😉

    Here are some pics of the damage inflicted by the (inert) 40mm rounds:

    Damage to chemney, bridge and SeaWolf launchers

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/marinha/f49rademacker/img3.gif

    Chemney

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/marinha/f49rademacker/img6.gif

    Bridge

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/marinha/f49rademacker/img7.gif

    um abraço

    in reply to: Your best pics of 2004 #2637997
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Alabama Battleship Museum, Mobile, AL (thanks Eric Palmer for the hint) 😉

    The beautiful F-8 Crusader

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v439/carloseduardo/festa008.jpg

    The mighty B-52

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v439/carloseduardo/festa001.jpg

    The awesome F9F

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v439/carloseduardo/festa054.jpg

    The impossible-to-give-an-adjective A-12

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v439/carloseduardo/festa066.jpg

    The A-12 and the author, bending to avoid covering the intake

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v439/carloseduardo/festa057.jpg

    in reply to: JA-37D vs Kfir C.10 #2638522
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    No the short take off of the Viggen is due to the high output engine. At the time it was considered most powerful engine installed on a fighter.

    Yes, way more powerful than the J79 (28,100 lb vs. 17,900 lb), I agree and stand corrected. BUT there is another important factor: the pitch control at take-off (the “roll” moment).

    The Viggen uses the canards’ mobile sufaces to increase nose lift and point the nose upwards.

    The Mirage/Kfir must push its tail down with its elevons, thus pointing the nose up. So it has to lose some lift to alter pitch.

    in reply to: HELICOPTER CRASH SURVIVAL #2639097
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Ejecting rotor blades looks pretty scary for someone nearby… Like friendly troops or civilians. It’s going to be a full-scale beheading contest.

    in reply to: JA-37D vs Kfir C.10 #2641708
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    JA-37 canards aren’t exactly fixed. They have little mobile profundors, acting in pitch control. Thats’s a huge difference between that and a fixed canard.

    One example is the take-off and landing runs. Deltas are awful, but Viggen is great.

    in reply to: General Discussion #402823
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    particularly

    in reply to: Best F-5 upgrades out there #2643234
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Why did nobody mention the Simorgh from Iran? Perhaps the double-fin layout make it far superior to all other beefed-up F-5?

    btw we discussed the Simorgh already in another thread, here:
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=28195&highlight=simorgh

    Unfortunately, little is known about the specs and capabilities of the twin-finned Iranian F-5 derivative. So, it’s a hard comparation to make.

    Anyway, this little Iranian fighter (BTW, a lovely interisting one) would be more a rebuilt aircraft than an upgrade, i.e., there are great differences between it and a F-5, it probably isn’t a F-5 anymore.

    in reply to: Argentine warship fires on Brazil ship #2065925
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    F-49 Rademaker = ex-type 22 RN

    D-13 Sarandi = Meko 360

    Some people say it was another warship (ARA P-43 Spiro, Meko 146) that shot the 40mm rounds.

    in reply to: Argentine warship fires on Brazil ship #2065928
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    There seems to have been a misfunction in the fire-control radar – it was supposed to shoot at a flying flare, but it locked in the Brazilian frigate.

    It was a 40mm salvo. This picture shows the 40mm cannon, it’s the smaller, double-barreled one:

    http://www.ara.mil.ar/La_Armada/MediosyCapacidades/Flota_de_Mar/Imagenes/meko%20140.JPG

    in reply to: Best F-5 upgrades out there #2643732
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Well, actually there isn’t any definition about the BVR missile. It can be any of the following (Derby, Amraam, Darter, Adder etc.), but unfortunately at this exact moment F-5EM/FM hasn’t got any BVR capability, or even a definition about that.

    in reply to: Brazilian navy clip #2065941
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Hey F5M,

    You posted a small pic instead of the video

    grande abraço,

    in reply to: RUSSIAN NAVY TO ASSIGN PIONEER LONG-RANGE MISSILE BEFORE 2006 #2066261
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Twin screws? Isn’t this a bad thing for noise-supressing? 😮

    in reply to: " Brazil is ready for a war " #2676536
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    Having a big budget doesn’t mean the country has even a fair military capability. That’s the case of Brazil and other SA countries: lots of spending with personnel, fairly good training, but lots of conscripts and awfully obsolete hardware. There could be lots of improvement if the same amount of money was spent in a correct manner.

    As a matter of fact, IMHO the Brazilians should see the fact of not being pushed into any weapons race as a good thing. But the military have to lose lots and lots of fat.

    in reply to: Mig-21bis vs F-5E/F #2676821
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    F-5EM, the first pics of the monoplace upgraded Brazilian Tiger

    http://www.alide.com.br/imagem/F5EM-022.jpg

    http://www.alide.com.br/imagem/F5EM-006.jpg

    in reply to: " Brazil is ready for a war " #2676826
    Charlie Echo
    Participant

    That was a diplomatic statement from a Frech Commander to his Brazilian hosts. Pretty overemphasized. Brazil is not ready, which is not a surprise. No war for a long time ago and ahead.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 234 total)