Is there not a picture of a Tu-95 Bear being intercepted by Royal Air Force E.E Lightning’s in circulation? I saw it once in a book but cant remember whether it was close to Scotland or not… But surely the presence of the Lightnings mean that they were scrambled to intercept?
Regards
BARNOWL
Check this: http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/printer_285.shtml
Fantastic! Where are the pics of the girls that answered the calls? ๐
Amazing pics! Cheers! ๐
3) BIP = Brutto Inland Product = value of all services generated/produced from Russia in a single year. It has dropped till the end of the 90s and is recovering now from an alltime-low. ๐
Hmmm, I guess you mean GDP – Gross Domestic Product – IIRC, that’s the English term for what you mean.
In my place, we say PIB – produto interno bruto.
http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-382918.php
http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?id=1&display=rednews/2004/09/25/build/nation/35-navy.inc
That’s interisting, thanks Dis.
The three destroyers in the 7th Fleet assigned to carry out the patrols are the Fitzgerald, the Curtis Wilbur and the John S. McCain.
These are DDG-51 Aegis-equipped Arleigh Burke class destroyers:
DDG 54 Curtis Wilbur
DDG 56 John S. McCain
DDG 62 Fitzgerald
All of them are Flight I ships.
MHO: looks like the MKK has a specific modification to be 38,8T without cracking the airframe. The MKI could possibly do this, but is not prepared.
Looking at it this way, the IAF chief would not be wrong – the MKI could have 38T. But it would be not prepared for that, that is, there would be consequences.
Apart from that, I’d like to say that the following kind of behavior is not shared by the huge majority of the “zillons in AFM” – actually, most of us most certainly think it’s rather childish:
Go ahead with your Su-30MKKs, we like our Su-30MKIs just fine – and between you me and the rest of the zillions on AFM we know which one is better :diablo:
Incident involving sailor from Admiral Chabanenko.
‘Quick response helped Iceland-base unit save Russian sailor ‘
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=23674&archive=true
What a fantastic story! As a surgeon, I must admit I was stunned by such a wonderful mission. Congratulations to all involved and thanks for posting that. ๐
Very nice, Roel, thanks! ๐
I particularly liked the Kongo (it must be a thrill to see an Aegis-equipped ship “in the flesh”) and the UAE frigate.
Hello Ja and Glenn,
No news from the Brazilian front, just speculation.
The last speculation push was last month, when the USA Military chose the Embraer platform (with Lockheed) as their ACS (Aerial Common Sensor): lots of people thought this was a sign that the F-16 would be chosen, either new-built or used.
๐
more on FAC Kfir in old camo…
Is he snorkeling? ๐ฎ :diablo:
Doing some Google, I found this one:
Nigeria Meko 360 (F 89 NNS “Aradu”, built by Blohm + Voss, 1982)

From this nice site: http://www.blohmvoss.com/e/prod/meko_360h1.html
A few photos from visitors to Plymouth over the last couple of weeks.
Wow, that IS a lucky man! ๐ Superb!
Beleza Flogger, ๐
I’d say Argentina is not that bad – with their A-4AR, they have a nice capability, with APG-66, AIM-9L and good avionics for the region. This, in combination with a relatively vast delta fleet, makes even a comparison with Mexico quite unfair. Mexico has the advantage in sensor aircraft, but there’s little combat capability besides one small F-5 squadron.
And Chile AWACS is a good one, but it’s a lonely plane – this has serious complications in sotie rate / total AEW coverage. So, FAB’s fleet with 5 R-99A provides better coverage.
And finally, it’s dangerous to compare only the combat capabilities. If support and logistics are put into account, FAB looks well beyond others – with a reasonable number of tanker, transport, sensor and rotary aircraft.
valeu,
Hello SSN,
Hello, do you happen to know what ship is on the right in this picture: (img)
The one with the straight-up superstructure and white satcoms antenna on top of its bridge…
Can’t read the number.Do you have pictures of that one too?
thanks.
Regs
SSN.
As Mpacha nicely explained, it’s the auxiliary ship “A 302 / SAS Outeniqua”. It’s a decommisionded vessel, or just to be. The A 302 can be read in the hull, although it’s easier in my 1,3MB pic in my hard drive. ๐
SAS Outeniqua bows out
31/07/2004 11:11 – (SA)Cape Town – The navy’s long-serving workhorse, the SAS Outeniqua, is being formally retired from the service – though she still has a lot of life left in her.
The decommissioning of the 12-year old vessel marks a shift in the navy’s capability and spending priorities resulting in part from its acquisition of new corvettes.
“She’s been a very good ship: she took part in some major operations,” navy director of special tasks Rear Admiral Arne Sรถderlund said on Friday.
But he added: “By losing her the navy’s not going to lose any real capability whatsoever.”
He said Armscor, the marketing and acquisitions arm of the defence force, would be given a brief to market the 21 000 ton vessel, which has an icebreaking capability.
He himself would suggest she be offered to the department of environmental affairs and tourism, which made extensive use of the Outeniqua when it was building a new base in Antarctica in the late 1990s.
But she could equally go to another government, or to the private sector, he said.
‘Sealift’
The Outeniqua’s main purpose in the navy was to provide “sealift” – transport of vehicles and heavy equipment in support of operations ashore.
She could also back up the SAS Drakensberg in offering combat support for other vessels, replenishing supplies of fuel, water, missiles and ammunition.
However, Sรถderlund said she was able to carry only a fraction of the 590 tons needed to fully refuel only one of the new corvettes, and was slow.
In addition the navy was having to manage on an increasingly tight operating budget.
“So we must make the best use of what we’ve got, and the priority must go to the new hulls,” he said. “Her time has come.”
Still in ‘very good nick’
The Outeniqua was still in “very good nick” and had another 12 to 15 years of life left in her.
“She’s just come back from Saldanha and a trip to Durban. She’s running well, so we’re optimistic we’ll find a decent buyer for her.”
He said the navy had no need to mothball her, and this would also be too expensive.
The Outeniqua was launched at the Kherson shipyards in the Ukraine in September 1991 as the Alexander Sledzuk.
She was bought on behalf of the SA Navy in 1993, as a replacement vessel for the ageing fleet replenishment vessel SAS Tafelberg.
The Outeniqua was used as a platform for peace talks initiated by then president Nelson Mandela off the coast of the former Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of Congo, in 1997.
She delivered the world’s largest mobile hospital and emergency supplies to Trieste, Italy, for victims of the war in Boznia-Herzegovina in 1993.
Edited by Elmarie Jack
http://www.news24.com/News24/South_Africa/News/0,,2-7-1442_1565889,00.html
Thanks for clearing that, folks ๐
That’s a lot of money. USD 700 million is the budget for Brazilian FX project.