dark light

Beermat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,146 through 2,160 (of 3,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #249281
    Beermat
    Participant

    Some of it I am unsure of – Ireland, the Falklands. Some of it I heartily agree with. None of it sounds utterly bonkers. Well, not as bonkers as him not wearing a tie being an issue, anyway. I guess if you look at the pictures in the paper but find all that writing stuff just too difficult it might be. Go on John, which bits?

    in reply to: Merged thread – Unelectable Corbyn and Let's not bomb ISIS #1810799
    Beermat
    Participant

    Some of it I am unsure of – Ireland, the Falklands. Some of it I heartily agree with. None of it sounds utterly bonkers. Well, not as bonkers as him not wearing a tie being an issue, anyway. I guess if you look at the pictures in the paper but find all that writing stuff just too difficult it might be. Go on John, which bits?

    in reply to: General Discussion #249288
    Beermat
    Participant

    You should try it. Before slagging it off, bleedin read it. What’s the matter, scared it might prove a rational analysis.. that would be a bit upsetting, wouldn’t it?

    Are you for real? It’s 2015 for pity’s sake. No tie is a problem for you?

    in reply to: Merged thread – Unelectable Corbyn and Let's not bomb ISIS #1810804
    Beermat
    Participant

    You should try it. Before slagging it off, bleedin read it. What’s the matter, scared it might prove a rational analysis.. that would be a bit upsetting, wouldn’t it?

    Are you for real? It’s 2015 for pity’s sake. No tie is a problem for you?

    in reply to: General Discussion #249303
    Beermat
    Participant

    Scruffy Oik? He has a BEARD? Oh no! Next we’ll find he’s actually READ A BOOK!

    in reply to: Merged thread – Unelectable Corbyn and Let's not bomb ISIS #1810823
    Beermat
    Participant

    Scruffy Oik? He has a BEARD? Oh no! Next we’ll find he’s actually READ A BOOK!

    in reply to: Windsor mint coin, is it accurate? #882868
    Beermat
    Participant

    Yes, it’s wrong. Green/grey camo, sky band, and a Mk.V – with cannon. This is Rubbish. The Lancaster is irrelevant, and it’s not the ’75th anniversary of the Second World War’.

    in reply to: General Discussion #249462
    Beermat
    Participant

    I am loving the triumphalism of those who think a one-party state is a good idea. Shame it is so misguided. The problem old tories have is it’s not ‘goodbye labour’ at all. It’s hello Labour, goodbye Blairite twits. I think they might find this a considerably more potent force to contend with 🙂

    in reply to: Merged thread – Unelectable Corbyn and Let's not bomb ISIS #1810896
    Beermat
    Participant

    I am loving the triumphalism of those who think a one-party state is a good idea. Shame it is so misguided. The problem old tories have is it’s not ‘goodbye labour’ at all. It’s hello Labour, goodbye Blairite twits. I think they might find this a considerably more potent force to contend with 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #249495
    Beermat
    Participant

    You might say that, I couldn’t possibly comment.. 😉

    For the record I was referring to the ‘austerity’ thing and the ‘most people’ claim associated with it, not the vote which was what it was.

    The vote is an actual measure. However it is important to differentiate between a government being elected under the current system whereby the majority didn’t vote for them, and majority approval for any one of that government’s policies.

    The two are clearly not necessarily the same, so ‘most people’ is a bold claim if it refers to approval. If the claim refers to people’s interpretation of policy, it is even harder to corroborate.

    That was what I was driving at.

    in reply to: Merged thread – Unelectable Corbyn and Let's not bomb ISIS #1810965
    Beermat
    Participant

    You might say that, I couldn’t possibly comment.. 😉

    For the record I was referring to the ‘austerity’ thing and the ‘most people’ claim associated with it, not the vote which was what it was.

    The vote is an actual measure. However it is important to differentiate between a government being elected under the current system whereby the majority didn’t vote for them, and majority approval for any one of that government’s policies.

    The two are clearly not necessarily the same, so ‘most people’ is a bold claim if it refers to approval. If the claim refers to people’s interpretation of policy, it is even harder to corroborate.

    That was what I was driving at.

    in reply to: General Discussion #249502
    Beermat
    Participant

    Dunno.

    I was just suggesting it might be presumptuous to state what ‘most people’ think, especially when one considers only a minority voted for the government. Whether its relevant or not is another question.

    in reply to: Merged thread – Unelectable Corbyn and Let's not bomb ISIS #1810971
    Beermat
    Participant

    Dunno.

    I was just suggesting it might be presumptuous to state what ‘most people’ think, especially when one considers only a minority voted for the government. Whether its relevant or not is another question.

    in reply to: General Discussion #249600
    Beermat
    Participant

    But can you be so sure of what ‘most people’ are now thinking?

    The Labour party leadership got that badly wrong (twice, once in the election,and once over JC) – I doubt they will be the last to do so.

    in reply to: Merged thread – Unelectable Corbyn and Let's not bomb ISIS #1810987
    Beermat
    Participant

    But can you be so sure of what ‘most people’ are now thinking?

    The Labour party leadership got that badly wrong (twice, once in the election,and once over JC) – I doubt they will be the last to do so.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,146 through 2,160 (of 3,326 total)