Sow the wind; reap the whirlwind.
No. Frequently used, but a complete misdirection. Who’s doing the sowing and reaping? Civilians don’t do much sowing of anything in total war that has escalated to city bombing. They just get turned into statistics and ashes. By both sides.
Civilians, whatever their lives, whatever their beliefs, moral or political, are rarely guilty of the actions for which they are ostensibly ‘punished’ by aerial bombing, if one subscribes to the ‘wind/whirlwind’ model. I would venture that the motivation is to destroy production bases, manpower, materiel and morale.
The notion of revenge upon civilians for a greater wrong committed by others is the logic of the terrorist, the bus-bomber, the beheading kidnapper. I would not ‘credit’ our strategists of the time with that motivation, whatever the handy catchphrases designed to maintain the support of an angry population for the strategy.
I dont think Disney would go anywhere near some of the subjects covered by Anime lol. Porco Rosso is a great film, in fact I dont think I’ve seen a bad studio Ghibli film.
True, but in this specific case, note the surprising bottom line:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235241[/ATTACH]
Stepwilk, it’s not personal, and I don’t wish to condescend. From my own experience of dealing with overly-pretentious ‘arty types’ in a previous career (and being condescended to by them) I do perhaps over-react sometimes. Technically, though, a cartoon in the context of film is a work using animation techniques to photograph a sequence of drawings rather than real people or objects. … – exactly what is meant by ‘anime’ in Japan. The fact remains that the words mean the same thing.
It’s a bit like calling food from a classy restaurant ‘nourriture’ to indicate its higher quality. But language is fluid, and anime has also come to mean what it has come to mean. My only point was not knocking anyone calling this film a cartoon, because that is (also) what it is.
It is patently obvious that the quality is different between the average ‘Western’ animation and this Japanese output – though early Disney works, such as ‘Fantasia’, are frequently lauded by critics and film historians now that they are so far out of cultural context that they can be seen without prejudice as artistic creations in their own right.
This looks more likely.. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=anime
This is a good cartoon, like Michelin starred food is good grub. I wouldn’t insist on Anime as opposed to cartoon – especially as it’s either a Japanese misapprehension of the French phrase (dessin anime), or a shortening of the American-English word ‘Animation’, both used to describe.. a cartoon.
But yes. A very good cartoon!
Makes you wonder.. an auction house can draw on experts who can spot a fake reproduction vase by a dot on the ‘i’ of the maker’s name, but don’t seem to give a toss about aeroplane bits that just don’t look anything like the bits they are claimed to be, despite there being a wealth of examples and people familiar with them out there.
Doesn’t the known fact that one of the Naval personnel pictured was a submariner, and the ASW scheme (as opposed to anything FAA), suggest Ballykelly and the joint-service Anti Submarine school as per my posts and links above, based at HMS Sea Eagle but using Lancasters out of RAF Ballykelly, as first suggested by Airfixtwin?
Two Lancasters with the JASS were SW371 ( http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=153955 ) and SW290 ( http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=30737 )
Certainly SW290 was carrying Naval personnel when it was lost: http://www.rafcommands.com/archive/04371.php
According to this source – http://www.avroshackleton.com/Ballykelly.html – the Joint Anti-Submarine School (RN and RAF) had it’s own Lancasters at Ballykelly (presumably on charge with the RAF at the station, but as a joint unit doubtless taking up naval ratings): “and the RAF’s JASS Flight, based at a now re-opened Ballykelly, initially equipped with two Lancasters, one Warwick and one Anson”
Bit of a gem in that department is ‘Aviation, the Pioneer Years’, Edited by Ben Mackworth-Praed. Definite French bias, suggesting French-language origins, but the ‘Studio Editions’ imprint I have gives no clues as to it’s genesis. Some wonderful detail, biographical and technical, and profusely illustrated.. from ancient legend though ballooning, gliders and other experiments in heavier-than-air, then developments right up to 1939. Engrossingly presented and fascinating stuff.
Hi all!
Does anyone have a tail wheel fork for a DHC Beaver?
Wonderful project superbly described. Thank you, and Happy New Year.
Re Codes –
I would tend towards ‘ED’ as unit codes for 12AGS, based upon just one reference I have found, here: “On 12 October 1943 Reuben Edward Foulds was on board an Avro Anson I with serial number LV139 and unit markings of ED-4 of 12 AGS (Air Gunnery School) on a gunnery training flight. The aircraft had taken off from Bishopscourt, Northern
Ireland, but lost the target and then their way in poor visibility.”
This is from http://rotherhamwarmemorials.weebly.com/south-anston.html
Cheers,
Matt
I’d go with the FW.. thanks all (not my area, German twins)
Would you walk into a bar you had never been to before and start insulting all the strangers present based on a single overheard conversation?
No-one is impugning the character of the author, and certainly not calling him names. This is an established and often quite erudite forum, and behind the sometimes daft user names and ‘banter’ are some respected and very non-anoraky contributors.
There is a degree of cynicism which will be applied by those who.. to be frank.. have heard so many stories like this one, but nothing personal is meant! There’s a chance, but I imagine you can tell by the responses of those who do know their subject – and many here do – it is seen as a miniscule one. I hope that the original poster will understand.
I believe, from looking at the map, that ‘Hillylough’ is Killyleagh.
It sometimes seems that accident form locations are more often spelled wrongly than correctly. It all adds to the fun of the detective work..
I meant the cost to make it into something comparable as a museum piece, not an assemblage of corrosion. Or conserving it to freeze the decay and thus justify moving it at all. As someone said, you get it out.. then what do you do with it. I believe experience has shown all options other than rotting away are rather expensive – prohibitively so in some cases.