dark light

Beermat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,271 through 3,285 (of 3,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: B-17 Sally B to fly thursday 29 April #1097865
    Beermat
    Participant

    Was quite a pleasant surprise to go for a walk in my lunch hour down Hills Road in Cambridge, hear a familiar rumble and look up to see her in the sunshine. People are so used to Hercs etc. coming in and out of Marshalls that nobody else looked up – I felt like shouting and pointing!

    in reply to: Sqn Ldr Gerald (Stapme) Stapleton #1112920
    Beermat
    Participant

    Deeply saddened – he was one of the finest, and his example should be an inspiration to all of us.

    Blue Skies…

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1115696
    Beermat
    Participant

    It’s an Air Ministry Rim Wound clock, of the “Spitfire type”. Whether the accompanying blurb makes you feel it’s worth a punt is up to you!

    Yes, I know what you mean 😀 I know there’s no chance of linking this to any aircraft or incident, I was wondering what the going rate for an item in this condition and with no provable link to any history might be.

    Beermat
    Participant

    Great find, Sycamore!

    What we’re looking at here – the odd bulging effect – is the original-shaped wing centre section mated in an ungainly way to to the new profile outers. The plan I have is of the ‘root’ of the outers. The bulge, when seen from that angle, is the thick forward part of the conventionally-shaped centre section, which then slopes down to the thinner forward part of the outers.

    Looks like a modelling project might be bubbling under – I’d better warn the wife.

    Beermat
    Participant

    Starfighter aerodynamic test-bed?

    Re the AW wing – I guess ‘low-drag’ was a relative concept..

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1120280
    Beermat
    Participant
    Beermat
    Participant

    I’ve seen a photo of this Hurri in Keys Hurricane salute bookazine, has anyone got any more photos of it or illustrations of it in plan form? The photo in the book dosn’t show the shape of the wing.:confused:

    Here’s a couple of photos of a poor copy of the Armstrong Whitworth GA plans, showing the aerofoil section (upside down – sorry) – the thickest point really is a long way back! Also the tip profile in plan and section – you can just about make out the faint lines marked ‘production hurricane’, which highlight the differences.

    in reply to: Alloy skin in a ditch, Weston Zoyland airfield #1130497
    Beermat
    Participant

    “eventually to a lorry driver the originator of the story…..” That lorry driver wasn’t called Gordon, was he? If it’s the same chap he then went on to run coach tours on the Somerset Levels for American tourists, proudly announcing things like ‘If you look to your left, you’ll see the actual field where Oliver Cromwell burned the cakes on the eve of Bannockburn’ ….What was known as a genuine local character.

    Yeah, my dad used to hang out in the tower and neighbouring buildings in the early 60’s, he remembers phones, Ops boards, maps and books all left in a ‘Marie celeste’ kind of way.

    As for the farmer’s name.. ‘no comment’ 😉

    I have attached a treasure map of the ditch location in case anyone (with permission, of course) fancies a poke around. Me, I live in Cambridge now and can’t really justify weekends away hanging around old airfields any more – much that I’d love to!

    in reply to: Battle of Britain comparison #1138875
    Beermat
    Participant

    In terms of straightforward performance, there were various comparitive trials conducted by the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE) and the Aeroplane and Armoument Experimental Establishment (A & AEE) during the war. The results of these are widely published in the better books on the individual aircraft types.

    Some of the A & AEE trials, as well as those of the AFDU, pitted two aircraft in a ‘combat situation’ to enable tactics to emerge (though this tended to happen towards the end of the war, not at the time of the BoB)

    An example of some of the results, in this case 109E v Spitfire I, is at http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit1vrs109e.html

    An AFDU report from later on is at http://www.kurfurst.org/Tactical_trials/109F2_UK/109F2_ES906_AFDU.html

    Hope this helps!

    in reply to: Introduction: (Robert Stanford-Tuck – Feature Film) #1145010
    Beermat
    Participant

    Henley tug towing a drogue.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hawker_Henley_target_tower.jpg

    as I understand it fighters would simply orbit at a safe distance and get called in one at a time to fire at the drogue – which would be at a greater distance from the tug than pictured here! It could be winched in and out. I seem to remember reading that it was released completely and floated down, and not landed with.

    in reply to: Introduction: (Robert Stanford-Tuck – Feature Film) #1146123
    Beermat
    Participant

    http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1943/1943%20-%201433.html

    This is part of an article about bomber gunner training, but the drogue target and method are the same as would be used for fighter gunnery training.

    in reply to: General Discussion #337568
    Beermat
    Participant

    First car – 1969 Vauxhall Viva Estate. It was 1987, I was 17, and it was too young to be a ‘classic’ and too old to be cool. It cost 30 quid. The plan was for four of us to take it round Europe – only two problems: 1) no driving licences and 2) completely mashed and seized clutch. The school very kindly let us keep it in the 6th form car park while we spent several weekends underneath it. (Just realised this sounds like a public-school jape – it wasn’t, this was a comp).

    Finally, it made it 30 feet from the gate on its first post-rebuild test flight, when the engine fell out. .

    Second car almost twenty years later! My beloved ‘nesting’ Focus. It decided it wanted to sit in a tree – many feet up – a couple of years ago. The AA man said he’d never seen anyone do THAT before, he was very impressed. I’ve kept the dents as a talking point..

    in reply to: Your first car #1912096
    Beermat
    Participant

    First car – 1969 Vauxhall Viva Estate. It was 1987, I was 17, and it was too young to be a ‘classic’ and too old to be cool. It cost 30 quid. The plan was for four of us to take it round Europe – only two problems: 1) no driving licences and 2) completely mashed and seized clutch. The school very kindly let us keep it in the 6th form car park while we spent several weekends underneath it. (Just realised this sounds like a public-school jape – it wasn’t, this was a comp).

    Finally, it made it 30 feet from the gate on its first post-rebuild test flight, when the engine fell out. .

    Second car almost twenty years later! My beloved ‘nesting’ Focus. It decided it wanted to sit in a tree – many feet up – a couple of years ago. The AA man said he’d never seen anyone do THAT before, he was very impressed. I’ve kept the dents as a talking point..

    in reply to: General Discussion #337593
    Beermat
    Participant

    1 – Idiot secretaries that call themselves Personal Assistants and think they are being paid solely to not put any calls through.

    2 – Idiot cold calling companies who think they can sell stuff over the phone, making a silly time-wasting game of the whole ‘phoning people up’ thing, and causing ‘1’ above..

    3 – Cambridge cyclists who believe that bike clips grant them magical protection from the ton of moving metal that they happily swing out in front of.

    4 – People who think the past is irrelevant because ‘we’re all different now’. Only the terminally stupid fail to learn from mistakes, and yet amnesia seems to be at the heart of UK politics.

    5 – People who claim that moving other people’s money around for personal profit is somehow useful to society in any way whatsoever.

    in reply to: What five things really annoy you ? #1912129
    Beermat
    Participant

    1 – Idiot secretaries that call themselves Personal Assistants and think they are being paid solely to not put any calls through.

    2 – Idiot cold calling companies who think they can sell stuff over the phone, making a silly time-wasting game of the whole ‘phoning people up’ thing, and causing ‘1’ above..

    3 – Cambridge cyclists who believe that bike clips grant them magical protection from the ton of moving metal that they happily swing out in front of.

    4 – People who think the past is irrelevant because ‘we’re all different now’. Only the terminally stupid fail to learn from mistakes, and yet amnesia seems to be at the heart of UK politics.

    5 – People who claim that moving other people’s money around for personal profit is somehow useful to society in any way whatsoever.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,271 through 3,285 (of 3,326 total)