Exactly – that’s the limit for a Centaurus Sea Fury. Nothing more than that. It gets progressively (exponentially) harder as you go faster – where it becomes ‘very hard indeed’ is entirely subjective. Designers tend to identify the maximum theoretical speed of their design as the speed which is ‘very hard’ to exceed- c.f. Lockheed and all the nonsense at the time about the P-38 hitting some aerial speed limit at a lot less than 520mph level speed (in fact it was an aerodynamic oversight that Lockheed never publicly admitted to) Those drag curves are a moveable feast – including those defined by prop design.
The oft-quoted 520mph ‘barrier’ does not exist. The problem has always been one of efficiency of prop blade aerofoils as they transit through sonic speed – you get more and more drag for any given ‘lift’ (ie thrust) as things get ‘shockier’ for want of a better phrase. This does not mean you can’t keep pouring on more and more horsepower, or that there isn’t an engineering limit to this for every design, but there’s no absolute limiting figure.
To break the record the aircraft needs to be substantially different to a P-51, and embody all the things learned ( and often curiously forgotten) about local compressibility effects since 1940!
Paul. You applaud someone bringing a subject up when they agree with your world view, then say it’s not something you care about when someone who doesn’t agree with your world view speaks. That says more about you than the subject.
What is a shame is how blinkered intelligent people can be – especially when it comes to nationhood.
Regarding self-governence – if you or anyone can point to how you have been oppressed or undemocratically put upon by anyone outside of our own independently acting Government then ‘remoaners’ would accept it. But no-one really has. So all that is left is a rational analysis of pros and cons. Eventually only those who’s nationalism is stronger than their willingness to approach the subject with brain engaged will be left in the Brexit camp. We are not there yet.. plenty of smart Brexiters are still thinking about it.
You missed my point. Remoaners want to be wrong for the sake of our economy – something that does affect our everyday lives in a way that the humdrum regulations necessary to maintain a shared trading block and business community do not.
“Pleased to see you addressing the oft quoted “Little Englander” rubbish, bazv” – Thayre, post 2384
“…you seem to care about it. I don’t so have no idea whether it’s fair or not or even matters” Thayre, post 2393
Consistency is everything, Paul.
Another thing to clear up. Remainers don’t want things to turn to crap. They just thought they might if we left the EU. Unusually perhaps for an internet forum one side of the argument doesn’t want to be right.
Found it. Oxford Living Dictionary.
Like many perjoratives, it isn’t recognised by the target but those who use it have a shared idea of what they mean by it. I am sure it’s not fair.
“An English person who thinks England is better than all other countries, and that England should only work together with other countries when there is an advantage for England in doing so”.
(Definition of “little Englander” from the Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus © Cambridge University Press)
Yours is one narrow definition, and perhaps one taken from a modern view of those who wished to withdraw from Empire for anti-foreign (not the more modern pro-foreign) reasons. The wing of the Liberal party with this policy were called ‘Little Englanders’.
I expect you had to reject a lot of definitions talking of overblown nationalism or describing the original anti-imperialist 19th Century version in context before you found that one, Paul.
While searching for the modern definition, try looking up ‘Dailymailitis’.
The sad truth is no-one really cares all that much about Brexit beyond our shores. We really are not as important as we think we are. It is this misapprension – that we have any leverage at all to negotiate anything but humiliation on our leaving – that for many remainers provides a further definition of ‘little Englandism’ in the context of Brexit. I agree the popular definition has shifted over 150 years. I hope this clears it up.
My first was more concise.
To explain ‘little Englander’ – it’s someone who thinks the thing they are most proud of is much bigger than it really is.
Not following again, John? Very happy in Europe. They certainly seem to have life cracked in this corner of it. Just stick the money in my account, I’ll buy something here. No miserable ‘little Englanders’ here, no anti-intellectual hatred of anyone who looks like they read books, no wealth-worship or politically motivated austerity. Basically not a blinkered, messed-up rainy little island off the coast of Europe.
As it happens I love the country of my birth, which was England. It’s just I am not sure where it went in this fog of imported American money worship, fear of co-operation internal or external and confusion about what a state is for.
Yes, but.. . what am I or any other remoaner denying? The glorious future laid before us now?
TonyT – ‘everyone is in denial’ is a fair summary.
John, you clearly know nothing about our research-centred HEI’s. They are international institutions that provide research positions to people largely regardless of the nation in which they recieved their education up to that point. So your tedious repetition of your untruth that we are at the bottom of an OECD education table is irrelevant. And you and I and anyone else who cared about this silly claim when you first made it know that we are only bottom of any table if you put the bar for inclusion in the table just below the UK score.
Paul, they do. The high level of funding is provided through specific programmes which divide into schemes and calls. These are unweildy and complex and a system that just about works to get the money to the right places and people has been arrived at only recently. It can not be re-invented instantly to channel treasury money the same way, even if the will was there to do so.
Yeah, true enough.
I have better things to talk about. But you might be surprised at the rather good reaction the oversized EU sticker on my van gets. French people tell me, unfairly perhaps, that leavers are stupid, I have nothing to add to that opinion, never mind repeat ad nauseum. Brexiters heads are getting buried deeper and deeper into the sand. A little bit of outside perspective only highlights this.
My company, among lots of other things, writes software that helps researchers find funding. Without funding a researcher cannot work. He or she has to eat, live somewhere etc. There is indeed no magic money tree for any of this. There is currently quite a lot of the necessary money available in the UK and a significant proportion of it is from the EU. It has nothing to do with anyone speaking English, and everything to do with the quality of our institutions combining with the level of funding sources. Which we are about to reduce. Stupid? As I say, I have nothing to add when a local says that. Except that maybe plenty of smart people voted leave as well.
It doesn’t make leaving many such complex yet co-operative systems of mutual dependency and benefit for some vague notion of national self-determination any less apparently silly to foreign people. What can I say? Just reporting opinions.
Not calling anyone stupid personally, so can you lay off the personals please?
Nope! I’ll have a look.
Thanks basv!
By the way I am sitting outside a French farmhouse with a view of the Pyrenees in tbe moonlight. The locals just think the English are a bit more stupid than they thought before.