dark light

Beermat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 3,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Introduction: (Robert Stanford-Tuck – Feature Film) #1135737
    Beermat
    Participant

    In Brian Kingcomes excellent ‘A Willingness to Die’ Brian mentions 92 squadrons new CO, Squadron Leader ‘Judy’ Sanders, who accidently set himself alight after using petrol from a nearby bowser to clean some oil stains off of his uniform, he absent mindedly lit up a cigarette…….and up he went, sustaining burns to his arm.

    Thanks, bump – looks right as the book said, IIRC, that it was a replacement CO

    in reply to: WW2 films #1135281
    Beermat
    Participant

    Wow!:eek:

    in reply to: Introduction: (Robert Stanford-Tuck – Feature Film) #1135312
    Beermat
    Participant

    Interesting that there’s an ‘official’ version of that, on http://www.rafweb.org/Biographies/Sanders_PJ.htm

    According to this version he’d already been posted away to a staff job (8th October 1940), and it was his batman’s fault! This site has it as occuring on the 23rd. Somehow, I’d go with the Kingcome version. Another source, Bishop’s ‘Fighter Boys’, has this as occurring on October 15th, ‘after returning… from a sortie’

    NewGuy – I presume you’ve seen this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxMJ2mX9UWo

    in reply to: BBC TV Series (Aviation Related) #1130146
    Beermat
    Participant

    They already have been denounced as that, many times.

    There’s a confusion around acts of war. I think its because of the ‘goodies’ and ‘baddies’ playground distinction – it throws many commentators into horrified confusion when they then grow up to realise that both sides (when looking at actual conflict, and not such genuinely evil crimes as the holocaust) will resort to equally nasty things in an attempt to win any war – at least, when it dawns that it won’t ‘be over by Christmas’.

    Some come to terms with it by putting things like area bombing to one side, calling it a ‘war crime’ and therefore an abberation from what must, in their heads, be the ‘normal, decent’ way of fighting total war – whatever that is.

    That’s my rant over.,

    in reply to: site with manuals for download #1124908
    Beermat
    Participant

    It’s not working for me – “Firefox can’t find the server at avialogs.com” 😡

    in reply to: What did you do on your 21st birthday #1116850
    Beermat
    Participant

    In a dark underground corner, Casablanca’s, Hope Street, Liverpool (now a trendy wine bar, then a quasi-legal damp, dark drinking hole and much better) wondering whether that girl was really looking at me or whether she just had a squint. Later it transpired that both were true..

    in reply to: Introduction: (Robert Stanford-Tuck – Feature Film) #1112433
    Beermat
    Participant

    Very nice! The initial mossie shots would have fooled me, too. Have you thought about contacting some of these CGI guys to see whether they’ll do ‘pilot’ (forgive the pun) versions of your flying sequences as written so far, perhaps to use an advert for your idea – or even just to help you/others ‘visualise’ things?

    in reply to: "How come I haven't seen one of those before?' #1107002
    Beermat
    Participant

    Most Target Tugs have been pensioned off service types

    Indeed – including the Defiant as mentioned above, which really found its niche in that role!

    in reply to: "How come I haven't seen one of those before?' #1107035
    Beermat
    Participant

    Well, it got uglier as time went on… check out the SB.3 variant..

    http://www.aviastar.org/air/england/short_sb-3.php

    And you’re right about target towing!

    in reply to: "How come I haven't seen one of those before?' #1107045
    Beermat
    Participant

    Thanks TT, that’s one for the wish-list. Daz, that Skyshark’s a new one on me too! Quite a performer, it seems. Larry, there’s quite a story around the whole ‘turret fighter’ thing, with competing 1930’s visions of how aerial interception was going to pan out tactically in a future conflict. Hindsight is a wonderful thing – and proved one particular school of thought correct! Other turret designs existed, and one was even proposed as a Spitfire variant.

    Funnily enough, before the Luftwaffe cottoned on the Defiant had some success as unsuspecting German pilots lined up to attack from behind…

    in reply to: Where in the house do you do make aircraft bits #1105447
    Beermat
    Participant

    In the spare room, furtively. Don’t tell the missus. I tried weaning her with a couple of bolts bought home for cleaning, and that was ‘oh, that’s interesting’ When I tried an engine frame it was ‘put that in the back yard – or yourself. Or preferably both’.

    I guess I went up in size too rapidly. I should have done it in stages, over several months.

    in reply to: Fabric Wing Hurricane project update – Little Gransden #1102127
    Beermat
    Participant

    Update on the project – we attached a wing spar to the fuselage for the first time today. It fitted after a few blows to the appropriate pins with a soft mallet 🙂

    As a comparison, in the pic you can see a completely different ‘metal wing’ mainspar attached to the wall in the background, above the cowling panels.

    Beermat
    Participant

    Here’s more on it: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA800776&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf – looks like the flight test figures are in the national archives, but are not on line.

    Beermat
    Participant

    We seem to have fallen over a copy of the original GA design sheet for the Armstrong Whitworth Hurricane wing, while gathering plans for our fabric ones. Indeed, it does appear similar in plan to the standard wing, the tips have a different profile and the root chord is slightly longer. The thickness is only marginally greater than that of the front spar. I’d love to see a photo too.

    in reply to: Whirlwind Build latest #757438
    Beermat
    Participant

    Thanks all! I’ll let the team know that this is a popular idea, and we’ll do it.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 3,326 total)