dark light

Beermat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 3,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #244579
    Beermat
    Participant

    Clouded by wishful thinking? About evolution and relativity? That doesn’t even make sense. What on earth has this got to do with school standards?

    John, there is no ‘equal opportunities’ lesson. No ‘human rights’ syllabus. And what if there were? You do sound like the confused and paranoid person I am sure you are not, really.

    in reply to: General Discussion #244603
    Beermat
    Participant

    So evolution shouldn’t be taught because it’s a theory. Like relativity. Or electromagnetism. Are you sure of your argument here, John?

    I am not a ‘victim’ of anything, thank you.

    in reply to: General Discussion #244620
    Beermat
    Participant

    The theory of evolution isn’t an ‘ism’, John.

    Do you really have a problem with rational science, equal opportunities, cohesion and human rights? Are these things you a) associate solely with the left, b) would rather were not put before children and c) think constitute an ofsted inspection?

    Are you actually for real, or is this just some massive but pointless wind-up?

    in reply to: General Discussion #244623
    Beermat
    Participant

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/02/13/dirty-secret-smart-democrats-know-but-wont-admit-about-trump.html

    This ‘left in crisis, we would advise them not to speak out any more for their own survival’ narrative seems familiar..

    in reply to: The Channel Dash #801831
    Beermat
    Participant

    Strikes me there was no shambles within the scope of the 11 Group response, more a single failure.

    Whatever the sequence of events and command/communication between and within the Navy and Bomber Command, within Fighter Command things were generally working ok while Leigh-Mallory was a single point of failure. If his staff were too frightened of his response if they bothered him with an urgent message that was his failing. If only he hadn’t ‘politicked’ his way across from 12 to 11 Group, things might have been different. One of many ‘ifs’, I know. Also one of several apparently inexplicable things about fighter command tactics and strategy 1940-42 that can be traced back to Leigh-Mallory.

    in reply to: General Discussion #244739
    Beermat
    Participant

    This is interesting – shame John’s wife won’t let him read it. Not any kind of political point, just a comparision between the spirit in which the private and public teaching sectors work – https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2016/feb/18/private-school-inspections-isnt-fear-ofsted

    in reply to: General Discussion #244744
    Beermat
    Participant

    Is everybody in your universe ‘politically motivated’? Feared and loathed as they may be, I can’t see how ofsted are any more politically motivated than traffic wardens or violinists.

    Coursework, and the occasional fiddling of it, are common to all schools that teach to GCSE. The threat of being purchased by a corporation – ‘acadamisation’ – is what drives state teachers to do it, while for private schools it’s down to more immediate financial considerations.

    Ultimately, GCSE grades are becoming a bit less about the kid and bit more about the ability of schools to maintain their independence and/or income by ‘upping the metric’. It’s not really a public/private or a left/right argument – it’s more the triumph of the philistine with a spreadsheet over those that value real education.

    in reply to: General Discussion #244878
    Beermat
    Participant

    Just to add, he’s not to the political liking to the majority of his own people.

    The characterisation of public protest as ‘rent-a-mobs’ is tired and nonsensical. Who in earth do you think is doing the renting? It used to be ‘Moscow’, back in your day, didn’t it John. So who is it now that they support the president’s mob?

    I don’t think any demonstrations here are about Trump’s election – that would be a bit pointless, wouldn’t it?

    in reply to: General Discussion #244991
    Beermat
    Participant

    I doubt they’d have me, John.

    in reply to: General Discussion #245105
    Beermat
    Participant

    Who does, John? Seriously, who?

    I hope you are not taking the lovely gentlemen you meet down at the BNP Social Club as representative.

    in reply to: General Discussion #245122
    Beermat
    Participant

    It does sound like you have a very personal problem with some specific person or people that you encountered in your past, John.

    Were you sacked for wearing that fetching red armband in class?

    Seriously, teachers have absolutely no time or space to spout any kind of ‘claptrap’. They have many ever-moving targets to meet and the fact that children are any more than fact-spouting rote-chanting automata (which is what recent education policy has actually been about, if you’d been keeping up) is down to the fact that some manage to be truly inspirational as well – even though it would appear the British right would much rather they weren’t.

    Yes, we face many challenges. I know it’s ‘outside the box’ for a rote-thinker, but many of them arise from a staus quo in thinking outliving global realities. We need generations who can think of alternatives, new ideas, old ideas repurposed, new understandings and new ways around problems that we haven’t worked out yet. A generation who won’t just repeat old mistakes. For that we need generations who know how to think, who can critically assimilate the ideas of others, who understand the world around them in all its complexity. In short, if we give a damn about the future we need our children and grandchildren to have a liberal education.

    Yes, that was a speech.

    in reply to: General Discussion #245136
    Beermat
    Participant

    I also worry about indoctrination. It is easier to indoctrinate a ‘blank sheet’ mind, and school kids are very vulnerable to it in this respect. The various churches know it, that is why they put money into ‘faith schools’.

    If you keep kids ignorant of how anything actually works and what all the arguments actually are – from both sides (liberal approach) – you are just extending the period in which they can unquestioningly begin to follow whatever doctrine they absorb from parents, press or their chosen corner of the internet. That way we just end up producing more Daily Mail believers or Guardianistas with no faculty for discussion or perspective.

    in reply to: General Discussion #245248
    Beermat
    Participant

    Um.. does anyone remember what ‘liberal’ means? If anyone is telling children what their beliefs should be, they sure as Hull are not ‘liberal-minded’.

    We are not American. Let’s stop getting that word wrong.

    Alan, where is this all from? Did you get the bits that are (at the very least) dubious to anyone with kids in the school system – (exclusion from lessons for views.. how on earth would that work in the school day?) – from our esteemed and famously credible tabloid press? And when you think about it, why exactly shouldn’t a kid ask their teacher to sign a petition?

    If it’s actual liberal-mindedness you have a problem with, then.. well I guess some people are attracted to narrow prescriptive thought, others are not. I just hope my children’s teachers are not.

    in reply to: General Discussion #245413
    Beermat
    Participant

    Sorry, that was an Anglicism which pre-dates the internet. To lose one’s thread means to confuse oneself into deviation from one’s original point. Still, that is often evidence of ‘losing’ a forum thread as well.

    in reply to: General Discussion #245418
    Beermat
    Participant

    I have been reading around all of this. I had no idea that the formerly high-brow ‘conservative media’ now contains articles that simply abuse non-conservatives and seem to be an excercise in thinking up names to call liberal thinkers.

    According to the National Review, the latest news is that opponents of Trump are ‘pantywaists’.

    RpR, taken with the actual latest news that those famously pantywaisted US immigration officials are going against the President but with the law* and not enforcing the immigration EO on the ground, isn’t there just a little part of you that thinks the USA is embarassing itself?

    *interestingly it was a state challenge from a red, ie ‘minority’ or ‘loser’, state to federal law that did this – so much for ‘control’.

Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 3,326 total)