dark light

Beermat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 3,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #251564
    Beermat
    Participant

    Sounds like the son inherited dad’s savvy. Nice one.

    in reply to: General Discussion #251567
    Beermat
    Participant

    To witness both launches and recoveries you would have to have been involved at a senior level in some space program. Is this what you are claiming, Mr Green?

    We are still waiting for the biographical notes that uniquely qualify you amongst our little coterie to proclaim on the worth of people and things.

    And yes, why has Helen Sharman been written out? If I was her I’d be a bit teed off by all the ‘Tim first Brit in space’ headlines.

    in reply to: Sully – Miracle on the Hudson #830074
    Beermat
    Participant

    Apart from the windshields..

    in reply to: General Discussion #251819
    Beermat
    Participant

    And there, over your last three posts, we have your political, intellectual and social outlooks each laid bare.

    in reply to: General Discussion #251825
    Beermat
    Participant

    I think people are misunderstanding what the ‘Time’ gig means. It is not an acolade, it just represents their view of the most talked-about or noteworthy figure of the year. Hence Hitler – and also Stalin (twice), Khrushchev and Ayatollah Khomeni. Also Vladimir Putin and Wallis Simpson.

    Or is this all too factual for you, John? Would you prefer me to look humiliated anyway?

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #832663
    Beermat
    Participant

    Not ignoring – I just don’t have the numbers to hand. I have just moved house, and everything is in boxes. I might have something buried deep somewhere.. but it may take time to unearth.

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #833137
    Beermat
    Participant

    Just to add – the Mk V’s sent for the defence of Darwin had DH Hydromatic props, not bracket. These are the ones that gave trouble.

    in reply to: Spitfire F.22 – with a Merlin?? #833407
    Beermat
    Participant

    ..and as published (earlier than the website) in Morgan and Shacklady.

    If I had to point to a likely source for the error, it would be that book, which seems to have suffered the attentions of a mischievous six year old who has just discovered ‘cut and paste’. It was an admirable undertaking, and a great reference, but one that has errors in it that took effort.

    in reply to: Spitfire F.22 – with a Merlin?? #833685
    Beermat
    Participant

    If it’s from M&S (and the site above quotes it as a source), then it’s a typo. They had a rule, one ridiculous typo per paragraph.

    in reply to: Flying Fortresses – 'My Mother And Other Strangers' #834350
    Beermat
    Participant

    The USAAF established a number of training and aircrew replacement bases in NI – with a function exactly as outlined by the TV drama (excellent Sunday evening fare): http://ulsteraviationsociety.org/usaaf-in-n-ireland-1942-1945/4537284067 covers it, on page 3. Bases were Toome, Cluntoe, Greencastle and Mullaghmore. One group used B-17s, No. 4 at Cluntoe – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAF_Cluntoe – From the geography it looks like this was the basis for the fictional station.

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #835579
    Beermat
    Participant

    Both/either..

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #835765
    Beermat
    Participant

    P, if you can produce more dh blade drawings with numbers and dims, then I will personally commission a statue in my back yard.

    Cue Mrs. Beermat muttering about ‘small erections’..

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #835782
    Beermat
    Participant

    This is great stuff. And had anyone else noticed that Australian Battles had smaller props? The UK ones were 55210’s. Unless this is the smoking gnu that disproves my tentative numbering system.

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #835913
    Beermat
    Participant

    It’s an odd one – the difficulty with that (and it was my thought too) is finding an Australian-built aircraft with a bracket prop (as opposed to Hydromatic type) of that shank size (ie 5000), designed for upwards of 1,000hp.

    Unless the Boomerang had one? This source – http://dbdesignbureau.buckmasterfamily.id.au/tech_info_cac_boomerang.htm – has them as Hamiton Standard 5105’s, and 11ft. Thus may be a drawing for an equivalent?

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #835976
    Beermat
    Participant

    Hurricane?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 3,326 total)