– definite shades of Michael Foot !
Indeed. Principled, Honest and in possession of an intellect. A man who values substance over appearance. All things the British electorate seem to despise, on recent performance.
It depresses me, but those who say he must go to make Labour electable are right. Such a sad situation for a once proud nation. Much of the world pities us, and I am embarrassed talking to my European friends.
Vote scruff!
Seriously, why do people keep saying ‘Corbyn-ski’? Is he Russian? Has no-one noticed the Russians haven’t been even left-wing for decades?
It is not Corbyn who is living in the past.
1fat. Small but salient point – the second referendum petition was started by a brexiter who thought the xenophobes wouldn’t win. He was wrong, and the signatories, though a democratic minority, are nevertheless enjoying that small irony.
What I am getting from a small sample down my local is a slow burning dawning among SOME ‘out’ voters that they have done something a bit silly in the cold light of day, and a second referendum would yield a different result.
Sadly I also witnessed a local shouting out of a window at a passing Polish mother with a toddler ‘Now you can pack your f*cking bags and f*ck off’. Now there’s someone riding high on democracy in action.
Of course, Bradburger, that does work both ways. Until now if the British Government said you could no longer investigate crash sites you had somewhere to go to challenge this. Now you don’t.
I concur that the principle of democracy is paramount and a majority have spoken.
Neither side covered themselves with glory in this campaign.
I do not fear for the long term – yes we can take it and move on. No Champagne for me, though. The local economy here in my home town will suffer, as a major element driving it – technical and pharma – benefits from EU loans and start-up funds as well as cross-border collaborations that are currently free of barriers and bureaucracy, but which will not remain so. That was the essence of the campaign locally, I am not sure that qualifies as ‘project fear’. Just a bit sad that this will now come to pass.
Still, let’s move on. If this spells the end of oily Dave, then some good will have come of it.
Yes. We had no self determination before, did we? That’s why we voted to… oh. Hang on.
The sad truth is that when we fail to immediately move into broad sunlit uplands those in charge (Boris?) will need to find someone else to point the finger at. I wonder who it will be?
In love with what, John? Xenophobia? Misinformation? Crashing stock markets? Collapse in our currency? Trade tariffs? What does the Telegraph tell you to say to those of us who were not ashamed to be British before, but are now, because to the rest of the world we have made an inexplicably self-damaging decision based on the stirring up of fear and loathing among the ‘I don’t understand politics and stuff but its all them foreigners fault innit’ constituency. European history suggests this form of ‘Democracy in action’ is less than a cause for Champagne.
When does a radio-controlled aircraft become a drone? and/or a light unmanned aircraft? Genuine question..
As suspected, then, the story was wrong. What is interesting is the involvement of more or less accurate aircraft, including the Blenheim as per the other thread on this.
Image 2 is more than the usual pdf – it shows how the crowd line has been moved forward 35m – red line/blue line.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]246650[/ATTACH]
Trimming the tank bank out and bringing forward parts of the crowd line might actually bring the display closer – this is certainly what the tweet suggests. As 11group says – where is the display line? Where was it before?
Aeros between 200 and 300kts need to be 30m further away than before – from 200m to 230m. If you can get 35m closer in the centre, and there is no need to steer away from the tank bank, there may be no net loss of proximity?
Thanks Alan. Oh dear, so it’s worse than I thought. Just the non-operational casualties for four months has taken two and a half years, so far.
I think it might be. A decision was reached to do this in December 2012 following consultation, and the National Archive released the first lot of transferred files in Jan 2014, and that was Sept 1939 to May 1940.
Working on the oversimplified and hypothetical basis of ten months of files thus taking 14 months to process, May 44 would take five and a half years, taking until 2019.
Now when you add that actual casualty and crucially missing airman cases per month could only have risen considerably in the meantime, and that already even the next ten months or whatever the batch is seems somewhat overdue, I wouldn’t hold your breath even for that.
But then, I don’t actually know anything!
No, not blanket – only if ten or whatever people with known ebay accounts have made the effort to report it.
If you are knowingly lied to, and it’s your choice to buy anyway because it’s cheap, that’s entirely your choice. If a warning has appeared because enough punters have spotted the fake and been moved to report it (not that that would really happen for a branded battery) and you still buy it it is still your choice!
Yes, but the fact that people felt the need to remind the punter of the bleedin obvious at this point is the needed ‘heads up’ at that moment on that item, without libellous accusation. That was my thinking.
Something democratic, like ten people have complained about the same issue with the same item, then it gets flagged up as an ‘advisory’, simply stating that 10 people have voiced concerns, and thus ‘buyer beware’? And have the issue in question present as an option on the drop downs -this will make the process automatic. Something like ‘History of item easy to fake and not proven / impossible to prove in this instance’, so nothing too accusatory at any stage?
More a sort of ‘heads up’ reminder from the herd to any newbies just what sellers are capable of, and that this item is the sort of item an unscrupulous seller would do this kind of thing with. Nice and wishy-washy to deter ambulance chasers.