But why monarch?
Why not the pratt currently taking up their resources?
Its not as if Monarch asked him to be distruptive.
So, in your opinion all airlines that divert for some reason or another should pay the penalties of doing so? What if one airline decided not to allow divertions in this case and consequently there was bodily harm inflicted on passengers due to a drunken idiot who the crew could not restrain for the remaining 4 hours of a flight?
What of it then?
I think its pretty unfair to expect an airline to have to foot all the fees in such a case as we are discussing here.
Besides one man is not going to take up as mush resources as the average portuguese fottball match does!
I agree here – but the thing is one way or another the Portugese have the right to get all expenses covered weather it be by the airline or the idiotic passenger – I would go straight to the airline as they can get the money from the said passenger.
Let me put things this way:
There is a drunken idiot on a bus, the bus pulls over outside your house and sticks him in your house and he is not allowed to leave. You have then got to pay to clean up his sick, give him a bed, food and all that – are you seriously telling me that you are not going to try and claim these expenses back one way or another?
Sign In
