dark light

Resmoroh

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 783 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Resmoroh
    Participant

    My main memory was when the RAF finally quitted Mildenhall. There was a vast Officers Mess Dining Night. Lots of Very Senior Officers from the past were present – some a bit doddery!!!. A good time was had by (from all accounts) all. All the historical Mess Silver was on display.
    A few days afterwards the RAF Sgts Mess held its Final Guest Night. The CMC had managed to wangle the retention at Mildenhall of the 3 Grp Silver for the Sgts Mess Formal Night. We invited all the Very Senior USAF SNCOs (Chf Top Mstr Sgts, etc, etc, – USAF NCO ranks have always confused me!). We had an excellent meal. The CMC had to stop some of our US colleagues from smoking between courses! After The Loyal Toast we toasted The President of The United States. Our US colleagues were gobsmacked at that, and at the traditional formality of the occasion. Their Top Man, in reply, said that he had lost count of the WW2 epics master-minded from these buildings. He then surveyed his colleagues and told them “This is a training course. This is how we will do it from now on!”. A few days later they did!!! I can only relate that on both occasions, the latter stages, were, as the report on the post-Falklands dinner on board one of the Carriers stated, “The conversation became relaxed!”. Contacts were made on those occasions that re-surfaced, in operational circumstances, many, many, years later. OK, two nations divided by a common language! We knew our bizz, and they knew their bizz. Good guys.
    That’s my memory of Mildenhall. Not, perhaps, aviation orientated – but a memory that sticks. And as I type BBMF have just flown over the 2nd Test at Leeds in salute for TMS 50th anniversary! Not bad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Resmoroh

    in reply to: Is this Woodvale?…Moggy #1297147
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    If you agree with my PI interpretations in my earlier that the sun was high in the sky then that must mean it was somewhere to the south. The engine nacelle and prop shadow is to the right of the a/c – thus the light source must have been to the left. Thus my opinion that the a/c was facing North(-ish). The rudder is in full sunlight, thus the sun was slightly to the right of the a/c centre-line (facing forward). If all this is accepted then the camera must have been pointing West(-ish). Pointing West(-ish) from Woodvale then the Irish Sea is nobbut a spit in the wind from the camera position. It is not often (i.e. very rare!), in summer, that Cu2 develops at exactly the same rate (a) over land, and (b) over a sea surface. The shot shows the same type of development well into the far (West?) distance – i.e. the surface over which it was developing was the same.
    I would dearly like this pic nailed. It’s bugging me – not just from an aviation point of view, but also from a professional point of view!!!
    Resmoroh (Met Man Retired!)

    in reply to: Is this Woodvale?…Moggy #1297337
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    For what it’s worth I don’t think those are hills. The cloud formation is 6/8 Cu (Type 2) as the lowest layer and 7+/8 high Sc or low thin As as the upper layer (strong, crisp, shadows). I think what can be seen beyond the trees to the left of the fin top are the tops of more Cu2 in the distance. The shot was taken somewhere around midday in the summer (a/c shadows almost directly under the wings – so the sun must have been high in the sky. That is also confirmed by the stage of development of the Cu2 on a normal summer’s day. The a/c appears to be pointing North (position of shadows). TE400 does not appear ever to have been on the strength of the THUM flight, or 5 CAACU.
    HTH
    Resmoroh.

    in reply to: Larkhill & Upavon #1299604
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    Nick, Hi!
    I’m sure our paths have crossed somewhere, sometime, in the Met O. Yes, Lyffe is right, it is the very same ‘Arry Wilkinson – and correctly described!! I came across him when we were on the same Watch in CFO Bracknell. Don’t know what his RAF Svc history was – but he definitely showed signs of Fighter Pilot’s Twitch!
    Rgds
    Peter Davies

    in reply to: Vulcan 21 x 1000lb Bomb Drop #1300643
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    John,
    Tks for that site heads-up. I’ll give it a whirl.
    Rgds
    Peter Davies

    in reply to: Vulcan 21 x 1000lb Bomb Drop #1301347
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    John,
    I was a Nat Svc meteorological airman at El Adem (in 1956, or 1957?) when – as far as we were told – a Vulcan dropped the first stick of live 21 x 1000 iron bombs on the bombing range (Hell’s Acres’s Farm!) southeast of El Adem. It was spectacular. Not only did the 21 x 1000 pounders go off – at night – but they also set off many of the AP and AT mines left over from WW2 and still buried in the area.
    In 1982 I was part of the RAF Mobile Met Unit team that briefed the Black Buck missions to Stanley Airstrip. Start to finish?
    Rgds
    Peter Davies

    in reply to: Crash of troop carrying plane in 1954 #1301560
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    I flew back from El Adem to Blackbush in G-AJBO in Oct 56 at the end of my Nat Svc. Eagle operated the Med-Air schedules at the time. As we flogged up across the Med I got (as a Met Man) to sit in Co’s seat for half an hour. As we entered a small Cu (Type 2) cloud the Skipper advised me to move my left knee slightly to the right. I asked why. 30 seconds after we entered the cloud water started to drip on to where my knee would have been. “We’ve been trying to find that leak, and fix it, for weeks” quothe the Skipper!
    Those were the days when real aeroplanes had fans on the front and flew through the weather, not over it.
    Peter Davies

    in reply to: Larkhill & Upavon #1302364
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    Aeronut,
    Willis & Hollis give the foundation date of the airstrip south of the A342 as 1912 – fairly early I think you will agree!. There’s about 50 ft difference from one end of the strip to the other. The Hercs do indeed use the strip for practice circuits & bumps (been there, done it!). North of the A342 (the current camp and golf course) has a great deal more up/down than the strip south of the A342. Taking into account the fact that take-off/landing rolls in 19-canteen required much less real-estate than now I would still go for south of the A342 as being the ‘original’ Upavon. When Lyffe is back on the circuit I will quizz him (he was there as a Senior Forecaster for some time!). Given what we know at the moment – and if I was a betting man (which I ain’t) – I would go for south of the A342. But stranger things have come out of this (and other) boards.
    Rgds
    Peter Davies

    in reply to: Larkhill & Upavon #1302982
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    Lion Rock, Hi,
    Upavon is, fairly certainly, still in the same location as it was from the very beginning (but Lyffe will have to confirm this). See http://www.content-delivery.co.uk/aviation/airfields/Upavon.html.
    Have no knowledge of the various Larkhill’s although the current(?) New Zealand Farm strip may be a contender.
    HTH
    Peter Davies

    in reply to: When did aeroplanes first get wet? #1303911
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    To be facetious – and taking the thread title literally – I would think shortly after the Wright Brothers tame Met Man had issued a forecast of “Mainly dry and sunny”!!!
    HTH!!
    Peter Davies (ex-Met Man)

    in reply to: Falklands video.. shocking.. #1304966
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    Interesting video. Shows a lot of the “front end” action quite well. But what has got to be remembered is that WE did not “win” the Falklands Campaign. THEY “lost” it. THEY made bigger and more important mistakes than WE did (and I was on Ascension long before the Task Force left UK, and arrived in Falkland just after the cease-fire) – and WE made plenty! What is needed is not to re-live the Tactics (and the euphoria) but to take a long, hard, look at the Strategy – using 20/20 hindsight as the Staff College lecturers will do (I would love to sit-in on some of their modern lectures on the Falklands Campaign!). A lot of, apparently un-committed, nations either assisted US – or did their best to negate what WE were trying to do. And I’m not just talking about the USA and/or the USSR.
    There is a lot more about Op CORPORATE that needs to surface before we can draw any real conclusions. Did the UK Navy know it was their last throw of the dice to remain a Blue-Water Fleet? Did the RAF know that without BLACK BUCK they would have become mere “Truckies”? Would WE, as a consequence, have ended up with one, combined, military arm (viz the abortive Canadian experiment!). From a military point of view WE did what WE were best at. However, as we live in a democracy(?) the military are beholden to the politicians. And how many of them, now, have actual military experience – very, very, few! During the planning, and execution, of CORPORATE there were a large number of politicians (M Thatcher excepted!) who had had military experience. It showed.
    Not now, I fear!
    Rgds
    Peter Davies

    in reply to: What happened with the Valiant? #1307663
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    Whilst on the subject of the late, lamented, Valiant one of the other problems it had was engine icing. In temperatures of 0 – +2 C and relative humidities of 95%+ (i.e. on a typical English Nov/Dec morning) on the take-off run the front end of the engines would accumulate a significant amount of ice. This was counteracted by bleeding off some of the hot exhaust gas and shoving back in the front end.. As much as 10% could be bled off I seem to remember. This meant that with a full fuel and bomb load a Valiant would have some considerable difficulty in getting airborne (from Wittering, for example) – if at all!. I believe trials were held with some sort of Rocket Assisted Take-Off device (similar to the JATO bottles used on Fat Albert). Does anyone have any memories of this? Was it successful? I think they did some experiments at Wittering but I was far too junior at the time to be told exactly what this highly secret trial was all about in case I wrote to the Russians and said “You can relax during Nov/Dec – we can’t come and dump a bucket of instant sunshine on you if it’s cold and foggy in UK.”!!!!
    Now that would really be a sight for sore eyes at Duxford (if we had a flyable Valiant) with it thundering down the runway accompanied by smoke, flames, and sparks from the RATO!!!!
    Yrs Aye
    Peter Davies

    in reply to: What happened with the Valiant? #1308879
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    When I was mucking about with the V Force the Vulcan and Victor were described as very good V-Bombers – but a long time in the gestation. The Valiant was described as a relatively cheap ‘n nasty stop-gap measure which could be produced quite quickly. It was never meant, for example, to be parked outside. This meant that dust and grit blew onto the fuel-line expansion sleeves and with age the seals degraded. On a calm night, about my routine met observations, you could hear the fuel dripping out of the Valiants as they stood on the pans. Indeed, in the latter stages there were drip-cans placed under them to stop the leaking fuel from eating the asphalt away!
    HTH
    Peter Davies

    in reply to: Rendcombe, Gloucestershire #1309991
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    If those of you with Google Earth go to 51 46 58.57N 01 57 09.58W you will see RENDCOMB. If you flip the image so that N is at the bottom you can read “RFC RENDCOMB”, in white, on the red-roofed building. I regret my PI skills are not sufficiently good to identify the airframe – but your’s may be.
    HTH
    Peter Davies

    in reply to: Transatlantic Dakota flights? #1310903
    Resmoroh
    Participant

    Tony,
    That London-Shannon leg by DC-3 and then across the Pond in something bigger makes sense. Except the original post says 3 hops! That must mean going by “The Pretty Route” (i.e. via Keflavik – Greenland – Newfoundland) and the bigger boys wouldn’t do all that nausea if they could make it across the Pond in one go? I would still like to know how far a DC-3/C-47 would go on full tanks until they became empty tanks! One source says 1400 nm. In which case all the legs (Stornoway-Keflavik 582 nm (or Shannon-Keflavik 798), Keflavik-Narssassuaq 650, Narssassuaq-Gander 795 (or Narssassuaq-Goose Bay 673)) would all have been well within the range capabilities of a DC-3/C-47 provided it was not battling into headwinds and airframe icing, and provided it’s payload was not too great!!!! The technical experts will, I hope, give their opinions!
    I would be very interested to hear from any real DC-3/C-47 Drivers/Navs what they think of this theory. At roughly 8 hrs per leg in the thundering, rattling, ‘roach coach’ of a Dak must have been a very daunting undertaking. Rather them than me – and I’ve done more than a dozen Op CORPORATE ‘Herc’ Airbridges (either from ASI to Stanley, or t’other way round!).
    This problem is beginning to intrigue me!
    Peter Davies

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 783 total)