dark light

aircraftclocks

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 264 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RCAF air publication CAP 10, section reference numbers #844429
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Bobby
    The differences are what I am trying to figure out. I have read somewhere that the Canadians “did their own thing” in relation to section reference numbers.
    In much the same way as the RAF, creating and deleting as circumstances changed.
    As a result not all codes are the same. Different aircraft and different stores etc.

    The RAAF as you know had their own system which incorporated the RAF system when it came into effect, over a period of time, but the basic principle of their original system stayed in place until NSN’s were universal.
    In all cases these codes or extra “letters” are about the management of and the assigning of management responsibilities to the correct teams of bureaucrats.

    This must be a big day for you, your first post on the forum, congratulations.

    In relation to AP1086’s I most likely have them and the 2 preceding vocabulary AP’s as well.

    PM me as I think we may have a bit to discuss.

    in reply to: Claudel Hobson Carburetors help. #846455
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Sunbeam
    Do you have a copy of AP774, Schedule of Parts for Claudel-Hobson Carburetters BZS and CZS?

    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Ex Brat its part 2. PM on the way.

    John, there appears to be several revisions of the book, so I had difficulty working out what the publication date may have been. No doubt all that information is in the Part 1 of the book.
    You are correct pages 515-529 are Experimental Testing of Radial Air-Cooled engines and the 615-618 are Factory Inspection methods.
    The factory inspection methods seems to talk about the types of metals used in different parts of an aircraft.

    in reply to: Sískin #853921
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Maxim08

    I found this comment on another web site. This maybe another clue for you to chase up.

    Bill Griffin, 28.09.2008
    As an ex apprentice of AWA ;I thought the Siskin was an important machine in the history of aviation. So when some years ado I was struck down with cancer; as a project I did a search for technical info on it. As a result, I saved some company construction drawings and have a copy of the AP. I endeavoured to chase up the remains of a Siskin that was supposed to be in a scrap yard in Canada, close to the Niagra Falls. I know it was there at some time previously; however my health was such that even with the best of intentions, my effort proved worthless. If anyone reads this who may know this scrap yard, will they please on my behalf pick up where I left off. You never know it could still be there.

    in reply to: Digitising Microfiche #853922
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Maxim08
    Thank you for insight in the matter. I also scan my documents etc. into TIFF files and then convert them into PDF once I have OCR’d them. You might as well work in the native file type of the end result, as I transform my documents into bi-tonal form for processing.

    I have also been doing this for years. The scanning of the microfiche is just an extension of this process. It is most useful when someone on the forum asks a, “Does someone have any information on XYZ”, type of question. For example the thread on Gemini or Messenger cockpit drawing question, or your recent question on Palmer type 77 wheels. I thought yes, I do have something on that.
    Just tapped it into the search of the computer, with in seconds I have results from my indexed drives. In both cases the provided information has proved useful and could have been difficult to source otherwise.

    Currently working on some old RCAF EO documents, some really great info is coming out. I appear to have forgotten a few things from when I was working on aircraft in the mob. (maybe a few things I never understood?)

    Scanning the UK CRL would make finding part numbers easier. In particular obsolete items that are no longer included in current part number/NSN search engines.

    I agree with you that the Irfanview viewer program is great and it forms a major part of my image processing for OCR conversion.

    The one conversation I have had with an imaging company was that the PDF was their standard service. At the time I had incorrectly estimated how many images I had, the bill was looking at $5500. That was based on 94 images per sheet, then I looked closer and found it was 270!

    I will be taking TonyT suggestion and looking on the net for surplus reader/printers coming up for sale. I am prepared to put a few hundred dollars into the problem.

    Looking forward to anyone else’s experiences in this area.

    in reply to: Messenger & Gemini Instrument Panels #854100
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Terry
    I have a few pages from the Gemini PN showing the instrument panel.
    Send me a PM and I will forward it to you.

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #858366
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    This may be of interest to Beermat only, but….

    I have the Aeronautical standards index issued 11-1-41, revised 5-1-44 which shows a number of standards related to propellers and associated items.

    These are:

    AS 41A Propeller Shaft Ends – Single Rotation
    AS 42 Cap, Thread Protector – Single and Dual Propeller Shafts
    AS 43 Governor, Propeller, Mounting Pad & Drive
    * AS 84A Splines, Involute
    AS 91 Propeller Shaft Ends, Dual Rotation (Propeller Supplied Bearing)
    AS 92 Cones, Front, Propeller Hub
    AS 93 Cones, Rear, Propeller Hub
    AS 94 Snap Ring, Non-Controllable Propeller Hub
    AS 126 Propeller Shaft End, Taper Type – Number 0
    AS 127 Propeller Shaft End – Flanged Type #1, 2, 3
    AS 128 Propeller Hub – Flanged – Spline Type – #7 1/2
    AS 129 Propeller Hub – Flanged – Spline Type – #10
    * AS 170 Cap, Thread Protector (Inboard) – Dual Propeller Shafts
    * AS 180 Propeller Hub-Single Rotation

    * New or Revised Aeronautical Standards issued as of May 1, 1944

    I have a copy of:

    AS 84A Splines, Involute
    AS 170 Cap, Thread Protector (Inboard) – Dual Propeller Shafts
    AS 180 Propeller Hub-Single Rotation

    Do you think anything in these 3 documents will shed light on the subject?

    I found a report on line that studies the use of blade 6487-12 with hub 24D50 in a particular situation. Would this help?

    in reply to: Sískin #867007
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Maxim08
    I did not notice that about the type 77 being able to fit 2 different sizes of tires.

    In fact looking at the information I forwarded to you, all the 7 types of wheel I previously listed can also fit the 750 x 125mm size tires as well.

    in reply to: Sískin #867679
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Maxim08
    Just had a look at other information I have, and I have found the Palmer 77. Here is all the different size wheels made by Palmer in the 700 x 100mm size.

    Wheel No Hub length Hub Bore Track Line. m./m.
    92 185 55 135/50
    95 185 55 Central
    77 178 44.45 132/46
    93 150 40 Central
    33 150 38.09 Central
    99 178 38.89 132/46
    96 178 55 132/46

    Not sure what it all means but I am sure with the few examples you have, you will.

    I would be interested to see what you make of my “standard wheel” and what wheel number you find it to be.

    in reply to: Sískin #868833
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    I have a poor copy of an Air board drawing, A6424, which shows a 700 x 100mm “standard wheel”. The drawing suggests that it was used on the RE8, RE8A, BE12, BE9A, TE1, FE9 and BE2C.
    Would this be of interest?

    in reply to: Lancaster Bomb Aimer's Panel Connectors #879033
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Just had a look at the AN3102 drawing dated 14-7-41, and it shows that these connectors are box mount circular soldered connectors.

    We know them as MS3102 connectors today and are readily available.

    I checked the size and insert arrangements and the number of pins Zorgon advises is correct.

    in reply to: DH Process and Tool order sheets 'worth keeping' #883288
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Beachcomber

    I use a composite image editor when I come up against a document bigger than A4.

    Just scan all four corners, assuming there will be overlapping areas being scanned, run it through the editor and the document is recreated.

    I use a freeware product from a well known software company.

    http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/projects/ice/

    P & P

    If you need anything scanned etc , drop me a line.

    I was over in Melbourne collecting something I bought on Ebay years ago, and the vendor and I got talking, and as a result I bought a folder of war time AS, ARP, AN and AND specifications and drawings.

    I am in the middle of scanning them. I have been wondering what to do with the scanned documents once I have finished. Perhaps we should share. Drop me a PM.

    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    It’s reference AVIA 14/17/1/103 and is shown as, This record has not been digitised and cannot be downloaded.

    http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C3196052

    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    Drawing A6594

    Mark
    It’s not A6591 as this is a drawing for the FE8 Tailplane, Clips, collar, wiring plate.
    I read the drawing number as A6594, being a drawing about the arrangement of the rear petrol tank for the BE2D & 2E.

    The original copy of the drawing is available from the PRO in the UK.

    in reply to: Mystery lot of parts purchased. #922362
    aircraftclocks
    Participant

    The gauge on the left is a Radiator thermometer indicator Mk 2A , +40 to +140 deg. C, 24V, Fluorescent.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 264 total)