I dont thnk nowadays they can m ake a historically correct version. What do they call the dog??
Humm, Let me think a second about that one, Humm I got it, how about Nig@er?
A Reach for The Sky re-make? Love it!! Trouble is, how on earth would they portray that troublesome loss of the tail now, eh? What HAVE I started?? Not sure I will be too high up the list of candidates for Technical/Historical Adviser!! Andy Saunders
The Gamecocks and Bulldogs in glorious Technicolor would be very nice though ๐
Hi,
ยฃ16 to ยฃ21 M to make the film.
Wow ๐ฎ ,How much did the real thing cost in ยฃ’s I wonder
? :confused:
Alex
ยฃ21 M, for a film with lots of effects!!!!!!! Stand by for some scratched film water effects and poor modelwork ๐ฎ
Oh God, what have I started this time? ๐ฎ I wouldn’t have minded if I’d been stirring the brown stuff, but I was just trying to be historically accurate… ๐
(OK, I’m kidding – I’m not upset, but a bit bemused by the speed of digression to interesting fantasy! Sadly Andy is right about the name confusion – I wonder if the producer was a St Edward’s School old boy, and got his airmen muddled?)
Adrian
Only joking, shows bad form old boy, in getting the names mixed up however. Reach for the Sky Remake anybody :diablo:
Bader V Gibson
Well, according to one recent TV programme it was Douglas Gibson VC who led the raid. I expect the bouncing bomb was just a delivery system for tin legs to Guy Bader. Andy Saunders
Bader V Gibson
I’ve got it, Bader was actually Gibson’s secret 5th kill in his new stealth Beaufighter in their battle of who would be the biggest SOB in the RAF. :diablo:
Reason for edit, new research (I though Gibson only got 3 kills on 29 Sqn) ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐
My current Cpl, who is about to read her RAF career die in a very horrible manner on her next F6000. (Totally useless cow, hated by her Superiors, peers and subordinates).
Hardly surprising. After all, itโs powered by the same engines that powered the F-104 starfighter and B-58 Hustler. They werenโt exactly lethargic either.
Incidentally; Iโve often read that the Tupolev Tu-154 was the fastest airliner. Whether weโre talking about absolute top speed or maximum cruising speed I canโt remember.
Most likely needed the thurst from those engines, The 990 had serious drag problems that resulted in those carrots on the wings being added, just to allow it to reach that 990 KPH figure that it got its name from.
not sure have seem it several times on various documentary progs..it is reputed to be the actual do17 in the incident that left the Huuri in the middle of a now busy london street…it falls like a leaf is the only way i can discribe it.
PS might have been on that doc about the dig on the hurri? but not sure..old age & tiredness ye see!
It was, Still’s of the film show the Hurricane falling out of the shot as well. I’ve got the details in a book somewhere, but from memory, The aircraft had already been hit and was flying out of formation on autopilot (did German bombers have such a thing) after three of the crew had baled out (leaving two dead crew on board). I do believe that the pilot landed in the East End of London and was lynched by an angry mob of civilians, before the Police and Home Guard got to him. Sgt Ray Holmes used up the all of his remaining ammo and then rammed it hoping to take off a tailplane as it was heading towards Buck House. Of course he instead removed the entire tail, thus causing the aircraft to bunt, the wings outboard of the engines broke off and the bomb load was ripped out of the bomb bay by the G forces (Didn’t they land on Buck House?). However, a gutsy move by Ray Holmes without doubt.
hey guys were having a chat about this over in commercail aswell:
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=997641#post997641
On checking the above thread it mentions the DC-8. I think the guy is right on that one in that a DC-8 did MACH 1 in a dive, the event is quoted in The Illustradted International Aircraft Guide – Early Jetliners dated around 1979/1980 (Cannot find my copy to confirm the date).
Fastest airliner? Wouldn’t that be the Su-27 that flew Putin to Chechnya? ๐
Has he not done Blackjack Air as well :diablo:
I have to say that my eyebrow raised ever so slightly in Roger Moore style when I watched the part that proclaimed that Bader and the Big Wing won the Battle of Britain!! Maybe I just misheard that part, but it is certainly the way it came across. Well I learnt something there . . . it wasn’t JDK’s Hurricane or the Royal Navy that won it after all !! :diablo:
Script Editing again I’d say, However the narration did say that the Big Wing did have its faults (which we all know of) and the fact that the wing was over London during the 15th Sept attacks did play a major part in making the German High Command aware that the RAF was far from beaten. That is a well documented fact in a lot of articles that Iโve read and its about the only plus point for the Big Wing tactic. As for JDK’s comments, WHAT WAS LEADING THAT WING THAT DAY (See attachment) ๐ ๐ ๐
It was not a bad program by a long shot and in my view done in a damm sight better taste than that one about Ray Homlesโs Hurricane that was done by Channel 5 a while back.
Anyhow, Thanks to information that I found on this thread, It now looks like I may have some BIG Spitfire profiles to draw (both with DB on the side) as somebody liked my creation below.
Papa Lima, Its on a DVD and will most likely be on its way to Sweden after you get back from the US as Iโm most likely going to look at a Spit or two this weekend, should I get yet another car problem fixed first. ๐ก
Whoops indeed.
Max Mach is 0,86, which is well below most Boeings. But compared to old RAF Hawks it is fast.
That has a max of Mach 0,88 , but the cruise at 30000 feet is just 652 km/h or Mach 0,6 .
Maybe the infos from the “Hawk-drivers” were doctored a little bit.
At least it is the fastest British built airliner after the Concorde!
I’ve been told by a guy on the RAF VC-10’s in the Gulf back in 2003 that on a C1(K) with the wing pods off and the IFR probe fitted, the max chat crusie on the aircraft is a bit faster than the book figure for a standard VC-10. what the figure was he would not say, but he did admit it was over 0.9 Mach. He could have been Line Shooting of course and the VC-10 with an IFR probe is not an Airliner.
Moggy
My conclusion would be, that as was found a couple of years back on this forum, that a shared IP address does indicate a common posting point and by implication collusion, where half of Hertfordshire were on the same NTL address.
There is no way that Dilip Sarkar, if it is he, and Andy Saunders, if it is he, could be colluding here.
Mark12 ๐
Very true, if they use the same ISP there is a good chance, you’re seeing the same pseudo IP for all three (the method for getting around the limit on IP addresses which was reached long ago for all you non computer geeks).
Hi everybody, thought I would like to share with you photographs of some wooden model aircraft that were built for me. As you will probably see, they are meant more for the childrens market and are usually sold as “Toys”. Hope you will agree that they are more suitable for collecting and displaying. If you want to see any more, (Lancasters, Halifaxes, Blenheims, and so on), please let me know and I will post more photographs.
Very nice, beats the Wooden Bucc and Tornado that I made in woodwork classes at School.