dark light

BIGVERN1966

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,215 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wattisham Airfield Museum. #1089247
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Assume you mean the gate guard at RAF Neatishead. It was scrapped because the base closed.

    That Phantom was XV420 if memory serves and it went to Neatishead because it had been the CO of 56 Sqn’s aircraft…who then became the CO of Neatishead. It was scrapped because the part of the site is was on was going to be sold off (Neatishead is still an RAF base, just its a bit smaller than it was 5 years ago), and the Conract with the US Goverment when we got them didn’t allow us to pass them on to third parties (This was forgotten until the US reminded us when we did sell/give away some in the early 1990s).

    in reply to: Bloodhound: Cold war walks #1112977
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Woodhall Spa Bloodhound Site

    Other British Bloodhound bases, mostly where launch positions are no longer visible:

    RAF Woodhall Spa: 53° 8’3.49″N, 0°11’47.24″W

    Most of the actual missile site is now RAF Coningby’s Golf Course, however a LCP and Work Service Building from one of 222 Sqn’s fire units are still standing, plus the location some of the missile pads can still be seen from the air.

    in reply to: Post Your Harrier Pictures #1136216
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    The one the SWO tried to stop people taking pictures of !!! the scars are still there to this day on both the jet and the wall

    How not to washdown a Harrier.

    in reply to: Falklands War 2010 #2431617
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Yawn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Well as regards SAM’s, they will not be dotted around the Islands, but around the one only really important target on the Islands. Also the problems that the land based SAM’s suffered had in 1982 do not apply (the Rapier Field Standard C in current use is a massive improvement on the 1980’s Field Standard A systems in regards reliability (FSA would fall over just by looking at it), firepower (FSA, 4 missile per laucher, single target engagement at a time, limited Situation Awarness on the system hence limited rate of engagements, Hittile concept, a near miss is a miss. FSC, 8 missiles per launcher, can engage 2 targets at the same time, excellance Situation Awarness on the system which will allow a rapid rate of engagements. Missile now fitted with proximity fuze hence a very near miss will kill the target) and all weather operation, plus they do not suffer from the poor siting problems that the deployments around San Carlos had as regards the Argies being able to fly under the missile system’s coverage). The problems with raid detection in 1982 again do not apply (ground based radar cover and command and control is excellent), then of course they have to get past the Typhoon’s which will not be easy.

    More sabre rattling by Argentine politicians with big domestic problems. Blown up by the gutter press over here. The BBC actually have a good handle on this and the actual fact is that most Argentine’s don’t want a war with the UK, even over the Falklands as they know that they will most likely lose such a fight.

    in reply to: Bloodhound – Missile – Fast car #1121137
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Also the fact that car will be powered by both a Rocket and a Jet Engine, as was the Missile (Though in the case of the missile, the rockets were only there to get the (Ram)Jets going. Yes Ron Ayres was the chief aerodynamascist on the Bloodhound Mark II missile (which was a little bit more than just a soupped up Mark I missile (The Spitfire and Hurricane share more common componants than those two marks of the same missile). As for the name of the missile, The Red Duster missile program got the name of Bloodhound, because it homes onto the target, like a Bloodhound and was the prefered name for the system given to MoS by Bristols. HQ Fighter Command wanted to name it after a Snake, while the Eng Arm Branch suggested it be named with a word starting with SA (for Surface to Air), like Saturn. The name picked for the weapon was finally selected in early 1956. (Read the MoS file about the naming of Bloodhound at Kew a few years ago).

    in reply to: 234(R) Squadron Hawk T1A 'DL' Serial Number #1124011
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Please follow link:

    http://www.abpic.co.uk/popup.php?q=1128499

    Thanks Phil, but already found the Air Britain Link.

    Snapshot from the Video I took, was only focused on the aircraft for a second, as the Pilot was in a rush to sign the Aircraft back in and Brief a couple of weapons phase students on that mornings sorite. As you can see, the Tailplane and a Liney were in the way of the Serial anyway.

    in reply to: 234(R) Squadron Hawk T1A 'DL' Serial Number #1124925
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Would be, if it was still in 234 Sqn markings with a Black tail and a DL tail code, which it is not. However here is the video I put on Youtube of my ride.

    in reply to: 234(R) Squadron Hawk T1A 'DL' Serial Number #1125763
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Thanks for that.

    in reply to: WINGS 1970's BBC series #1126082
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Well it is on YouTube – first part here. :D:D:D

    in reply to: WINGS 1970's BBC series #1126096
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Yep, was a cracking series although i was only young when it was on:diablo:

    Cant wait for them to release Ruskin Air Services now!!:diablo::D:D

    Christian

    Agreed, Airline is the next one on my DVD wish list, after just getting my hands on Danger UXB and Wings having been ordered as an Xmas present.

    in reply to: WINGS 1970's BBC series #1126206
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    jeez that was a long time ago..all i can remember is one episode where some **** goofed up and the fitter starting up lost his hands?

    The only other bit I remember from watching it was the Sgt getting shot down behind enemy line’s, being looked after by some French or Belguim farmers, recovering from his wounds, and successfully getting back to Allied lines by nicking an Eindecker from a nearby German airfield (and almost getting shot down by his own Sqn in the process).

    in reply to: WINGS 1970's BBC series #1126324
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Indeed it is about the RFC in WWI and from what I can remember it (being only 11 at the time it came out), it was very good. Main focus was on a couple of pilots, one being a Commisioned Officer, and the other being a Sgt (the two guys on the center of the DVD cover. Story was set in 1915/6 and the Sqn they flew with was equipped with BE2C, which of course was getting wasted by Fokkers at the time (though the Sgt (who was also a metal basher before becoming a pilot) does come up with some good idea’s that give the BE2’s half a chance, like seat Armour and a ‘Lanoe Hawker Bristol Scout’ type forward’ish’ firing Lewis gun mount).

    Cheers for the Link, I now know what to ask for Xmas.

    IMDB Reviews Here

    in reply to: If No "Dambusters",What Could Be Made? #1139993
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Are you sure?
    But then I’ll gladly admit to not having seen the film for many years…probably on a small TV so I couldn’t read the tags.
    That’s my excuse…and I’m sticking with it.:D

    More that Sure, and Youtube is my friend:D:D

    in reply to: If No "Dambusters",What Could Be Made? #1140069
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant


    Yes, but playing a Canadian….;) *you need to cover your keybord when you cough*
    🙂

    Hate to say this JB, with a Eagle Sqn and USA badge on his battledress, Canadian I think not.

    in reply to: My dads photos from Coltishall in the 60's 226 OCU #1159469
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Humm Bloodhound Photo wasn’t taken at Coltishall, looks like one of 85 Sqn ‘D’ flight sections at West Raynham which would make the date of that shot from the early to mid 1980’s. Nice photos of Coltishall though.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,215 total)