dark light

BIGVERN1966

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,215 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Impressive Kill Ratio #2575652
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    That F-117 Shoot Down in 1999 was a fluke, believe me (I do have sources a lot more reliable than AFM speculation and doggy Russian web sites, unfortunately for all you F-117 lovers I cannot tell the whole story thanks to my sources still being classified).

    in reply to: Warsaw Military museum – Mig, Antonov, Mil.. #1317936
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    A mate showed me some photos of this place that he took on a visit to Poland a couple of weeks back this morning (Brought them in to work for me to drool over), from what I saw of them, that place has some very interesting bits and pieces including a number of SAM systems (with Launchers and Radars) and even a Spitfire in RAF (Polish) markings.

    in reply to: Old RAF Station Crests-Here and abroad. #1319042
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Just to confirm the terminology, All RAF formation insignia are defined as Badges (including the main RAF one) with the exception of the ones which are defined as Coat of Arms (which are used by RAFC Cranwell, CFS and the Department of Air Warfare (uses the old School of Flying one)).

    in reply to: Old RAF Station Crests-Here and abroad. #1319198
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Hi Chris – The sea hawk has consumed a lot of time and a great many beer vouchers. I have enjoyed rebuilding her immensely though and made countless new friends along the way. I can recommend it!

    My telling off was quite tongue in cheek. If my failing memory serves, it was Jerry Shore at the Fleet Air Arm records office. Sadly (for us) Jerry has now finally retired. Nice people there, very helpful and very friendly. Oh, and they did send me a lovely jpeg of the 802 sqdn badge for use on my sea hawk nose. You can see it here: http://wv838.com/802.jpg

    Roy.

    Roy

    Thats a very nice NAS Squadron Badge, how big is the copy that you got sent?

    Richie

    in reply to: Falklands Anniversary/ Sea Harrier #1320342
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Afternoon All,

    One or possibly two Victors carried some of the kit left over from when they were SR.2s IIRC? 😮

    Tim

    The recce sorties flown by the Victors were just MRR sorties just using the old NBS (H2S Mk 9 of the top of my head) radar for surface vessel search around South Georgia.

    Three sorties flown.

    20/21 April – XL192 Capt – Sqn Ldr J.G. Elliott – Tankers outbound XH671, XL163, XM715 and XL189. Return leg Tankers XL163, XL188, XL 164 and XL511.

    22/23 April – XL163 Capt Sqn Ldr M.D. Todd – No details of Tankers

    24/25 April – XL189 Capt Wg Cdr C.C.B. Seymour – No details of Tankers

    in reply to: Shockwaves and 'pulling vapor' #2577007
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    microlite? :confused:

    The Thrust SSC Team had a mircolite or two that were used to aerial photos of the Car’s runs. Needless to say, they didn’t try to chase the thing, but orbited around the measured mile/Km (I cannot remember which was used) to get the photos.

    in reply to: Pointless Quiz is BACK! #1320374
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Stab in the dark for this one, but its the only one that I know of that looks close. A big CAT, Grumman F9F-2 Panther. MEOWWWWWW

    in reply to: Pointless Quiz is BACK! #1320391
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    P-59 NOT!!!!!

    in reply to: Old RAF Station Crests-Here and abroad. #1320540
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Yep, they are correctly defined as Badges (Though they are called the unit crest by most servicemen, which does help separate the design from the other unofficial unit badges that you can find. Saying that most airmen until AP 3003 was released didn’t know that the design of the badge was controlled in the way that it was. My current unit lost full station status in 2005 and the OC wanted to change the words on the Station Badge from RAF to RRH, (Check out the ASACS page on the RAF web site if you don’t know what RRH means) That was until I told her that she could not (with the AP3003 open on the correct page and my finger on the paragraph)).

    in reply to: Gripen fires Meteor missile! #2577099
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    When they recovered the pieces of the first Meteor the intake covers were still in place. There’s a writeup on it in this week’s AvWeek

    Which would explain why it didn’t work ;), however not the first time that its happened on a ramjet powered weapon.

    in reply to: Shockwaves and 'pulling vapor' #2577137
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    How ’bout this? (Thread didn’t say it had to be a plane “pulling vapor” 😀 )

    The photos from the microlite are better, Thrust SSC was surpost to be able to do 850 MPH, however at Mach 1 the Shockwave broke the ground up in front of the car and the rolling drag on the wheels went through the roof, hence the car got to Mach 1 and would not go any faster

    in reply to: New Supersonic Bomber For USAF ??? #2577773
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Did not NASA build a test aircraft to trial that Wing configuration at low speed (XD-1 was the designation if I remember correctly) in the late 1970’s? The plan was then to build a supersonic version based on the F-8. I never heard what happened after that.

    in reply to: Pointless Quiz is BACK! #1321890
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Canberra B8(I)

    in reply to: Pointless Quiz is BACK! #1322284
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    I’ll go for an F-86 Sabre, possibly in Canada? Cummon James, show us a bit more than just a few panels?

    WRONG…..and the answer is to read other posts 😮

    in reply to: Pointless Quiz is BACK! #1322471
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    JDK has already told us all its an early jet

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,215 total)