dark light

BIGVERN1966

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 826 through 840 (of 1,215 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Al-Zarkawi Thread (Merged) #1929411
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    It is a good thing that he is gone,however i doubt situation in Iraq will change anytime soon.

    True, However waiting to hit the guy with a group of his underlings around him was a class move, most likely took out the guy who would have replaced him in the short term at least. 🙂

    in reply to: Javelin vs Sea Vixen #1252119
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    the Sea Vixen was a multi role type… i wonder how meny air to ground sorties they done… when the Buccaneer arrived i would have thought the Vixen had a 100% air to air role… i have seen a picture somewhere of a Vixen loaded up with 4 Bullpups… what other air to ground weapons did they carry….. was the Vixen ever used in anger….

    The Sea Vixen was used in the sinking of the wreck of the Torrey Canyon, along with the RN Buccaneers and RAF Hunters. The Vixens using a mix of 1000 pounders and Napalm.

    in reply to: Coltishall Documentary on BBC1 Now! #1252449
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    I heard somwhere that the cockpit collection would be moving to the city of Norwich Aviation Museum.

    A new building will be purpose built for the housing of these sections, 2 x Lightning, Bucc, Jag, Phantom, Shack and others.

    Anyone add any weight to this rumour?

    Regards,

    John.

    I’ve heard that most of the collection will be going to Norwich, However the Radar Museum at Neatishead is also going to be setting up a Coltishall display which a selection of stuff from the Coltishall history room and that one of the Jag cockpits will be going there (The cockpit collection has both a GR1 and a T2 front end). As the Jaguar was the last aircraft type controlled by Neatishead as an operational CRC, the addition of a Jag to the museum collection would be fitting. The real pity was that they could not get their hands on Phantom XV420 before it was scrapped (they did try their d**m hardest 😡 😡 😡 ).

    in reply to: Javelin vs Sea Vixen #1253350
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    With reheat [later marks] and delta wings the Javelin was probably aiming to be more than the Sea Vixen (DH110), given that the latter is a clear larger development of previous the DH twin boom fighter concept, albeit with axial flow engines and highly swept wings, however the Javelin did have a lot of problems and was under continuous development with about 9 marks versus the Vixen’s 2.

    The main problems with the Javelin included the fact it was recommended not to roll it (a bit silly for a fighter!), the fact that its thrust output diminished when the reheat was engaged and so its use was restricted to altitudes above 10,000ft. I have read that this was because of insufficient fuel flow, but I think its more likely that a lack of a variable geometry nozzle to relieve the backpressure that is caused by the reheat system was what probably diminished the performance. The T-tail produced a few problems and lastly the thick wing section prevented true supersonic flight. There was a thin-wing supersonic Javelin on the drawing board but that I think was killed off either by the infamous Defence White Paper of 1957 or perhaps because the RAF or MoD had lost faith in Glosters?

    The Jav was not called the Drag Queen for nothing 😀 😀 😀 .

    The Reheat thrust loss was mainly at low level (due to the Reheat fuel pump causing fuel starvation on the main fuel pump (the reheat and main fuel pumps were feed off the same supply pipe :confused: :confused: , if memory serves), at high altitude the main fuel pump feeding the front end needed less fuel at max dry output, hence the fuel system could cope with the required extra demand for gas in reheat (which again was less, than at low level).

    in reply to: helicopter pioneers #1253364
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Let’s see who is the first to tell me what is significant about this Whirlwind?

    First to fly with Turbine Engine??? or last one in RAF Service (Looks like CFS badge on the side).

    in reply to: helicopter pioneers #1253369
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Here you go:

    The Sikorsky S-56, called the CH-37 Mojave by the US Army and HR2S-1 by the US Marine Corps, was a large heavy-lift helicopter by the standards of the 1950s. It came into being as an assault transport for the USMC, with a capacity of 26 fully-equipped troops; the order was placed in 1951, the first prototype flew in 1953, and production deliveries began in July 1956 to Marine Corps Squadron HMX-1, sixty aircraft in total being produced.

    The US Army evaluated the prototype in 1954 and ordered 94 examples as the CH-37A, the first being delivered also in summer 1956. All Marine and Army examples were delivered by mid-1960. Army examples were all upgraded to CH-37B status in the early 1960s, being given Lear auto-stabilization equipment and the ability to load and unload while hovering. In the 1962 unification of US military aircraft designations, USMC examples became CH-37C.

    At the time of delivery, the CH-37 was the largest helicopter in the Western world, and it was Sikorsky’s first twin-engined helicopter. Two Pratt & Whitney Double Wasps were mounted in outboard pods that also contained the retractable landing gear. This left the fuselage free for cargo, which could be loaded and unloaded through large clamshell doors in the nose. The single main rotor was five-bladed, and designed to function with one blade shot away in combat.

    The CH-37 was one of the last heavy helicopters to use piston engines, which were larger, heavier and less powerful than the turboshafts subsequently employed. This accounted for the type’s fairly short service life, all being withdrawn from service by the late 1960s, replaced in Army service by the CH-54 Tarhe.

    Four CH-37Bs were deployed to Vietnam in 1963 to assist in the recovery of downed US aircraft. They were very successful at this role, recovering over $7.5 million dollars’ worth of equipment, some of which was recovered from behind enemy lines.

    Westland had a Licensed Private Venture turbine powered prototype based on the CH-37 called the Westminster if memory serves. The project was cancelled when Westland’s took over Fairey and continued with the Rotadyne (Which was then cancelled as well).

    in reply to: helicopter pioneers #1253374
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    i think she “or he” was named humphrie or something similar… 🙂

    Humphrey was a Wessex HAS 3 (XP142 AN/406) based on HMS Antrim with 100 Flight of 737 NAS. It was used to rescue the Crew and (SAS) passengers of 2 Wessex HU 5 (XT464 and XT473) that crashed on South Georgia during Operation Paraquat, the British operation to retake the island in late April 1982. Humphrey also did some Spec ops insertions, Rescued a number of SBS/SAS personnel who’s outboard motors had failed on their inflatable boats, plus depth charged the Argentinean submarine Santa Fe. It was damaged by cannon splinters when Antrim was attacked by Argentinean Air Force Dagger fighter bombers on 21 May 82 while the ship was in Falkland Sound. The Helicopter was due to be retired in July 82 anyway, hence it went to the FAA Museum when Antrim returned to the UK. There was only one other Wessex 3 in the Falklands in 1982 and that was XM837 GL/400 (103 Flight 737 NAS) which was called Willie. Willie was destroyed in the hanger of its home ship, HMS Glamorgan when it was hit by a surface launched Exocet missile on 12 Jun 82.

    in reply to: Coltishall Documentary on BBC1 Now! #1253582
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    But on the positive side, we had 30 mins of aviation on BBC1, which is 30 mins more than usual….. 😀

    Well, BBC 1 East for us lucky few. 🙂 I’ve got it burnt on DVD for Canopener Al, who told me about it 30 minutes before it was shown. Chance of repeat, I’d say about zero. 😡

    in reply to: Coltishall Documentary on BBC1 Now! #1253936
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Damn and blast……….cought the last five mins.

    Will it be repeated and when?

    Regards

    John.

    Most of the program covered 41 Sqn Ops up to their disbandment (with the Sqn’s junior Pilot and OC, getting their asses handed to them by the Typhoons (which you don’t see on film)) and the lead up to the closure parade (The Rock (who is a mate of mine) shouting at personnel on parade, He is a Two Stripe by the way and he has a great sence of humour, as well as having a father). Narration was by Martin Shaw. Aircraft mentioned in the narration. THREE. Spitfire, Hurricane and Jaguar. Mick Jennings got the wartime Night Fighters (Mossie and Beaufighter) mentioned in some of his interview, plus some of the fighter aces Tuck, Bader, Johnson, Etc (Plus Raymond Baxter). Not one word on the Polish operations, Post war Mossies, NF Meteors, NF Vampires, NF Venoms, Hunters, Lightnings, HAF/BBMF or the SAR Ops (like about half of the Station’s operational life). Other people interviewed were Mike Rondot (painting End of the Line) and looking around the nose of the Avid Guardian Reader. There was a piece by a Spit pilot who flew on anti V2 ops in 1944 (covering how his best mate was killed by flak over Holland on big ben ops) and a WAAF LAC who worked in the Officers Mess for 3 years who was walking around Scottow cemetery.

    in reply to: F-22A Pics, News & Speculations Thread #2590204
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    USAF Edition.

    Prices on the board are a little bit cheap!:)

    in reply to: LEGO Aircraft Carrier #2051787
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Ah okay, so its probably just a generic DD. Pity, still trying to figure out what it reminds me of though 🙂

    Daniel

    Stern and hanger rear end look like that of a long Perry, but as stated, most likely a generic escort (DD/FF). I’ve been through every thing I’ve got and nothing comes close, US or European 🙁

    in reply to: who will win the UAE trainer competition? #2590837
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    I’d be surprised if the Hawk is not selected.

    in reply to: F-35 namig (at last?) #2591520
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Considering the uk operated the BAC Lightning and America the P38 Lightning I think F35 Lightning II is a very suitable sollution.

    Both types were successful in their respective services and imagine the naming ceremony:

    A nice video montage of both types and how the spirit is being continued with the F35.

    Perfect!

    😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀

    in reply to: LEGO Aircraft Carrier #2051899
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    I think the escort might be a Spruance actually 🙂 Not a Perry anyway. Sigh if only. I never got past tanks and attack choppers. Built a fairly faithful AMX-10RC at one stage. Still got it largely intact at my folks place IIRC. Should get the stuff for my own kids, but, nah 🙂

    Daniel

    Its not a Spruance, Rear Funnel is off set on that class. A Perry should have a Phalanx on the hanger, but the funnel is in the right place.

    in reply to: Maritime attack role eyed for B-1B #2592697
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    I can’t help but think a GPS guided munition would be worthless against a speedboat. You’d have to be using the radar to track the boat and update the munition so frequently that it would become in-effect a radar-guided munition. Against something like an amphibious assault though where the ships would be much less manueverable I could see it packing quite a punch.

    Cannot really say on this one, However, a 250 lb bomb going off in close proximity of a speed boat would not do it any good at all. :diablo: :diablo: :diablo:

Viewing 15 posts - 826 through 840 (of 1,215 total)