dark light

BIGVERN1966

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 1,215 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What's in a name? #1289191
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Does anybody known what were the other front runners for TSR2 Names?

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1289201
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Try HERE

    😀 😀 😀 HA,HA,HA. Is there a bigger Bart about? 😀 😀 😀

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1289211
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    but what was the Fairy Delta 1?

    THIS 😀

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1290690
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    the BAC/BAe EAGLE FB mk 1…..that sounds good…or would it have been GR-1..or just B-1. they would be getting a bit long in the tooth by now. i wonder what there replacments would have been. 😉

    Eagle GR 1 would be a good bet, however the aircraft’s Strike and Reconnaissance role would have made Eagle SR 1 a more likely choice (It was not called TSR2 for nothing. Of course the aircraft that was procured in the end was the Buccaneer S2, however the Navy tended to use S designation more than the RAF, (However were not versions of the Victor and Vulcan given SR designation’s?).

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1290873
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    There is actually quite a lot of documentation in PRO regarding this – mainly what was discarded or rejected (e.g. Thunder). No decision had been made regarding the TSR2, however the name favoured was indeed ‘Eagle’

    F-111K would have been ‘Merlin’ (Because the Merlin swings it’s wings back before it attacks!!)

    P-1154 would probably have been Harrier

    The final OK for the naming of an aircraft is at Defence Minister level. From what I’ve seen they tend to make official the name selected by the manufacturer (Classic example was Bloodhound. Bristol and MoS wanted to call Red Duster, Bloodhound, The Armament Eng. guys wanted to call it Saturn (and all other Surface to Air weapons to have names with SA at the front) and Fighter Command wanted it to be named after a Snake. Bloodhound of course was chosen.)

    in reply to: Heads up tonight, Pearl Harbor BBC1 8:00 #1291873
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    A reason to watch…….Not the CGI, not the ‘action’, not the doubtful plotline
    but Kate Beckinsale in that slinky nurses uniform with those seams in her stockings……..err sorry chaps, slight loss of dignity there hhhhrrruuummmppphhh :p

    I’d rather be with Deborah Kerr on the beach, myself (very risky for the time).

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1291894
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    that is a good question…i have often thought the same thing….
    at the time the RAF liked to name there aircraft after birds of prey..kestral, harrier, hawk…you never no the TSR-2 may have been named after one…buzzard, eagle, merlin, goshawk….but i suppose we will never know.

    Eagle has been quoted for TSR2 in a modelling Magazine. There may be some document somewhere with what idea’s BAC had.

    in reply to: What-If: NATO-WP Air War in Central Europe in 1987 #2571666
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    I may wrong here, but were not the F117 and TLAM-C both fully operational in 1987?

    in reply to: Heads up tonight, Pearl Harbor BBC1 8:00 #1292106
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Melv doth protest too much 😀 Bigvern that’s harsh 😮

    Correction to that, It was not something I read, its a quote by my Mum 😀

    in reply to: What-If: NATO-WP Air War in Central Europe in 1987 #2571810
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    What about the RAF’s fleet of Phantom FG.1/FGR.2 and F-4J(UK)’s?

    Only two squadrons for 2ATAF, based at Wildenrath. The rest were for UKADR use.

    in reply to: Heads up tonight, Pearl Harbor BBC1 8:00 #1292322
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    The best Summary I ever read about this film was as follows.

    If you want a Love Story with the 7th December 1941 backdrop, watch ‘From here to eternity’.

    If you want to watch a decent film about of the events on 7th December 1941, watch ‘Tora, Tora, Tora’.

    If you want to watch a decent film about the Dolittle Raid watch ‘Thirty seconds over Tokyo’.

    If not, watch Pearl harbour.

    in reply to: What-If: NATO-WP Air War in Central Europe in 1987 #2572576
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    I have spent some time to find in Internet various sources describing NATO and Warsaw Pact Air Forces OdeB in the 1980s. Well, I have already finished this job and I have also compiled and merged informations from many data sources taken together. To simplifing analysis I decided to focus on NATO/WP air strength in Cental Europe because this theatre of military operations would be critical for NATO-WP war’s outcome. Below I show my aggregate numbers of both sides military aircraft in this area.

    WARSAW PACT OdeB on Western Theatre of Military Operations in 1987. (it comprises all fixed-wing military platforms based in East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Poland and USSR’s Baltic, Belarussian, Carpathian Military Disctrics)

    1. FIGHTER INTERCEPTORS: 2276

    – 862 MiG-21 Fishbed-J/K/L/N
    – 1058 MiG-23 Flogger-B/C/K
    – 65 MiG-25 Foxbat-E
    – 36 Su-15 Flagoon
    – 165 MiG-29 Fulcrum-A
    – 45 Su-27 Flanker-A
    – 45 MiG-31 Foxhound-A

    2. FIGHTER-GROUND ATTACK: 1232

    – 80 MiG-17 Fresco-C
    – 75 MiG-21 Fishbed-D/F/J
    – 424 MiG-27 Flogger-B/D/J
    – 563 Su-7/17/20/22 Fitter-A/C/D/H
    – 90 Su-25 Froogfoot-A

    3. BOMBERS: 900

    – 455 Su-24 Fencer-A/C/D
    – 156 Tu-16 Bagder-C/G
    – 107 Tu-22 Blinder-A/B
    – 182 Tu-22M Backfire-B/C

    4. AUXILIARY PLANES (Recce/ECM/tankers): 609

    – 81 MiG-21 Fishbed-H
    – 104 Yak-28 Brewer-D
    – 83 MiG-25 Foxbat-B/D
    – 80 Su-17 Fitter-H/K
    – 66 Su-24 Fencer-E/F
    – 96 Tu-16 Bagder-D/F/J/K
    – 47 Tu-22 Blinder-C/E
    – 12 Tu-22M Backfire-D

    GRAND TOTAL: 5017 military aircrafts

    NATO OdeB in Central Region, 1987 (including fixed-wing military platforms based in GDR, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, USAFE planes in UK and part of French planes in FRG and France commited to strenghten Central Region in the event of war as well)

    1. FIGHTER-INTERCEPTORS: 467

    – 68 F-5 E/F “Tiger II”
    – 96 F-15 C/D “Eagle”
    – 12 Panavia “Tornado” ADV
    – 145 Dassault “Mirage” F-1
    – 38 Dassault “Mirage” 2000
    – 12 BAe “Lightening”
    – 16 Saab 35 “Draken”
    – 80 F-104G “Starfighter”

    2. MULTIROLE FIGHTER-GROUND ATTACK: 1134

    – 216 F-4 E/F “Phantom II” E/F/G
    – 356 F-16 “Falcon” A/B
    – 36 CF-18 “Hornet” A/B
    – 72 SEPECAT “Jaguar” A/E
    – 108 A-10A “Thunderbolt”
    – 175 Dornier “Alphajet”
    – 31 BAe “Harrier” GR.3
    – 60 Dassault “Mirage” IIIE
    – 80 Dassault “Mirage-5”

    3. BOMBERS: 351

    – 211 Panavia “Tornado” IDS
    – 140 F-111 “Aardvark” E/F

    4. AUXILIARY PLANES: Recce/ECM versions of western planes included above.

    GRAND TOTAL: 1952 military aircratfs

    Main sources: IISS “The Military Balance 1987-1988” London 1987, The Analytic Science Corporation “Preliminary ATTU Unclassified Conventional Weapon Systems Data Base” Fall 1987, “Between Rhine and Elbe: France in teh Conventional Defense of Central Europe” Comparative Strategy 1987, various articles from “Military Review” and declassified National Intelligence Estimates (NIEs) from the 1980s.

    Well, basic question is: who could probably gain air superiority over Central Europe in the event of NATO-WP war???

    No Tornado ADV’s in CENTAF region ever, Lightning’s were gone from RAFG by that time. Two Squadrons of Phantom FGR2’s 24 plus aircraft as RAFG fighters.

    No NATO aircraft in GDR, may have found lots in the FRG however.

    in reply to: Media Ignorance? #2572639
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Hi Sens. Presidents are allowed to, it seems !
    Since “RS” was Reconnaissance /Strike and Strike means Nuclear,it kind of makes you wonder about the early “SR” 71 concept doesn’t it? 🙂

    Strike was a British designation only was it not? (ie Bucc S2, SHAR FRS1).

    in reply to: Media Ignorance? #2572643
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    A “fact sheet” printed in a May 1999 edition of the Norwegian tabloid Dagbladet stated that VJ SA-6 GAINFULs could only be defeated by HARMs employed from Luftwaffe Tornadoes…

    Obviously He had never heard of ALARM, RAF, USN, USAF, USMC, EA-6B, F-16 or F-18 then.

    Saying that, to the average press, SAILORS AND AIRMEN do not exist. W**k’*

    in reply to: Cold war prototypes that didn't make it #2572656
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    come to think of it i agree.. what i was really getting at was the B-1 was cancelled and then resserected, and the whole F-111 program was almost cancelled, the RAFs order and the navys F-111B was… 🙂

    F111B was cancelled because it was too heavy for operations on carriers at a safe land on speed (even after Grumman tried to cut off every lb. that they could).

    F111K was cancelled as a pill (sorry for the pun) to the left wingers in the labour government at the time to get prescription charges started into the NHS.

Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 1,215 total)