dark light

BIGVERN1966

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,215 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Still not very nice stuff when burnt, vapourised or rendered into fine dust. Unfortunately just what happens to munitions when they hit their targets.

    There is a lot of suspicion falling on DU as a major culprit in what we know as Gulf War Syndrome. Not good for the lungs…

    DU is also used as ballast on cargo aircraft so I’ve been told, I do recall a story of 800 lbs of the stuff being on that 747 that crashed just after take off from Stansted in December 1999. I do recall a lake having to be drained in the attempts to find the stuff. (I was told the tale by an ex brother in law who worked at the airport).

    berylium is another strange and exotic material used in some bearings on aircraft (wing sweep on Tornado, and under carriage on c-130 spring to mind).

    Yet another nasty substance when burnt, vaporised or rendered into fine dust. Its also used in Avoinics systems.

    in reply to: Bawdsey Radar Group – Latest News #1329599
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    During my time at Aberporth we always did our Bloodhound launches in the daytime (definitely not at 3 am!), with very high speed Vinten motorised cameras recording everything. The cruising speed was Mach 2.5 if I remember correctly. The missile used to woosh over our heads (the radar crew) and the first time, the scientists warned us that there would be a vibration at the appropriate frequency ro make our eyeballs fall out! Hence there were several radar fitters with eyes tightly closed at the moment of launch. Of course after several launches we became blase, but it was always fun to watch the slow-motion replay, especially when a Meteor took a direct hit. When seen from the ground, the launch was very impressive, one moment the missile was sitting peacefully on its launcher, the next there was a white smoke trail leading up to the heavens – no chance of seeing the missile in mid-flight – it was just gone literally in a flash!

    ๐Ÿ˜ฎ ZERO to MACH 1 in 14.7 FEET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ The Boost motors came off four seconds after launch, at this point the missile was at Mach 2.2 and the missile had travelled over a mile in slant range. ๐Ÿ˜Ž A Swiss missile was night launched from Aberporth in 1986.

    We were told, IIRC, speed Mach 2.5, range 50 miles, and they had a radar proximity fuse with expanding link-type warhead to make a cone of steel pieces that no-one would want to fly through!

    Yes, I was told that at Newton as well (and I worked on the B**dly Missile for four years). There was a lot of misinformation that was spread about systems capabilities in those days (the only personnel in the know were the guys who drove the LCP, the Engagement Controller and the Techincal Supervisor), the actual figures were in some respects were much higher and the the Mark 2โ€™s warheadโ€™s mode of operation was in fact a lot more spectacular than just filling the sky full of shrapnel. (I was told by a Cpl at West Raynham that a Mark 2 would kill a Bear at 120 Miles easy, He was in fact not that far off the mark). I’m going to post a thread in the next couple of days with a much fuller story of the big green dog, as I think this thread is actually suppost to be about Bawdsey’s Transmitter block. First in the Field!

    in reply to: When did the last Hurricanes operate? #1330395
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Most of 6 Sqn’s Hurricanes were U/S during 1947 (THey were also operating Spitfire LF IXe’s as well during the period to make up the numbers), they could not get the Tempest VI fast enough.

    in reply to: Bawdsey Radar Group – Latest News #1330443
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    I was lucky enough to watch some test firings at Aberporth while at Western Radar,an awesome sight,I recall a part wobbling before the launch wonder why?
    also we then tracked the airborne missile on radar, what a speed, only equalled when I witnessed meteors being tracked at West Drayton air traffic …well what else could they be doing mach4 at 3 am over Southern england…no.not UFO !!

    The only bit of the missile itself that moved before launch were the ramjet weather covers which were blown off 2 seconds before launch (on the Mark 1 this was done by the Ramjet Igniter Flares which caused them to pop off. On the Mark 2 there was a cover ejection charge which very forcefully blew them off (in a couple of cases the rear cover on the lower ramjet knocked the missile’s umbilical cable off and caused a misfire. A modification to the launcher reduced, but never completely solved the problem.)

    in reply to: Bawdsey Radar Group – Latest News #1330537
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    BIG GREEN BRISTOL DOG

    — Again a very OFF Topic post —

    did anyone build the old Airfix kit complete with Landrover and launch platform that contained ‘moving parts’.

    The Airfix kit is being re released this year. The kit is a of Mark 1 and was based on photos taken at a press day at North Coates in late 1958 (even down to the pose of the RAF Policemen and the Dog that came with the kit). the Newsreel of the day can be found on the British Pathe News web site.

    The Bloodhound in the kit was never painted green in operational service as the Mark 1 was phased out of RAF service in 1964 to be replaced by the Bloodhound Mark 2 which was in fact a completely different missile in every way (the only things common that the two marks of missile had were the basic shape and the Name!). I cannot think of any major part of the missile or the systems that went with it that were common to both systems.

    The original Mk 2’s were painted white when they entered service in 1963 until they were based in west Germany in the mid 1970’s, when they started to be painted green.

    Does anyone know how many Bloodhounds exist, it would be fantastic to put one on the gate at Bawdsey, it would have quite a bit of pulling power I suspect.

    Bawdsey had a Mark 1 as a Gate Guard in the 1980, it was located near the Manor house. It may be the one now at Fixton, going there via West Raynham.

    However, the Fixton missile could be the one from West Raynham that was kept behind the Missile Servicing Flight there in the 1980’s. Here is how I found out how different the two marks of missile actually were.

    One day a Chief Tech new to the system told a couple of J/Ts (also new to the system) to rob it for spares. The boys that had worked on the system for some time told the Chief that this was a complete waste of time as nothing was common) . Chief tech thought different. Complete electronics package from front of Mark 1 missile removed. Electronics packs from Mark 1 found to be fitted with printed circuit cards mounted along the missile’s longitudinal axis much like the spooks of a wheel and found to contain lots of valves . Electronics packs from Mark 2 missile totally transistorised and cards mounted at 90 degrees to the missile’s longitudinal axis.

    Items from the Mark 1 ended up being put in a box marked ‘ Ye old English Steam Driven Missile Spares’ – Not be to be fitted to Bloodhound Mk 2!!!!!

    Missiles that still remain in existence (that I know of)

    Mark 1

    Sandtoft Flying Club – Painted green and on a Launcher.

    NEAM – Sunderland – White one on the its side. They also had one outside that was saved from the Bristol Collection at Kemble in 2002 and was got for its rocket boost motors.

    Norfolk and Suffolk – Fixton – White one and on a Launcher.

    IWM Duxford – White Cut-away one in the Battle of Britain / Fighter hanger (not an operational round).

    Misson (near Doncaster) – White Missile on the remains of a Launcher on an actual Bloodhound 1 Launch pad (Old 94 Sqn site which now belongs to a surplus army vehicle supplier). The site is called the Rocket site, funny old thing.

    North Luffuham did have a Mk 1 as a Gate Guardian. I do not known if its still there. There was a number of Mark 1โ€™s dotted around the airfield as well, back in 2002.

    Wells Archaeological Savage (between Wells and Glastonbury). White Mark 1 โ€“ most likely the most complete Mark 1 in the UK, only bit missing from weapon is the steel point off the nose radome. Missile also has complete stenciling.

    There is one at the LV3 museum in Sweden, two in museums in Australia (RAAF Point Cook on a Mark 2 launcher and Classic Jets) and two as Gate Guards at RAAF Darwin.

    Mark 1 Hybrids โ€“ Mark 1 airframes modified to look like Mark 2โ€™s for loading training

    Sandtoft Flying Club – Painted green and on a Type 202 (Mk 2) Launcher. I think this round was the gate gaurd outside SHQ at West Raynham in the 1980’s.

    Point Cook RAAF Museum. Restored and in excellent condition.

    Mark 2 Prototype (XTV) / Pre-Production Missile Evaluation Trials (MET) Round.

    Kemble โ€“ Bristol Aero collection – White round on a Mark 1 Type 200 launcher. Kemble thinks this round is a Mark 1A. It is more likely to be a mix of XTV17 and Bloodhound 2 MET Round. This round was the Bloodhound that was in the Missile Museum at Newton in the mid 1980โ€™s and then at Cosford. Round serial number is off a Bloodhound 2 MET round that was the last Bloodhound to be fired at Woomera in 1964/65. (that actual round broke up in flight 6 seconds before interception of the target. However it had been 15 Joint Service Trials Unitโ€™s โ€˜Hanger Queenโ€™ and had been rebuilt twice for different trial firings that were done in the end by other rounds). The Ramjets on the missile are early Bristol BT3s that are a halfway house between the Thor 101 series engines on the Mark 1 and the 200 series engines on the Mark 2. The BT3 only ever flew on the Experimental Test Vehicles (XTV) that ended up with the XTV 18, which was almost a production Mark 2 in Build standard.

    Bloodhound Mark 2 Production Rounds.

    RAFM Hendon โ€“ on the gate. This round, serial No 1002, was used as a handing training round for most of its life and a lot of modifications that were done to the operational Bloodhound Mark 2 rounds were not done on this missile

    RAFM Cosford โ€“ There was a complete Mk 2 Type 86 radar equipped missile section with one launcher and missile. The missile on the Launcher was round serial No 1001. This round was used as a handing training round for most of its life and a lot of modifications that were done to the operational Bloodhound Mark 2 rounds were not done on this missile. It is also the round that the 1-32 Scale Flightpath Kit was based on. There was another ex operational round at Cosford in the early 2000โ€™s on a Ready Use Shelter (RUS) Stand. I think that one will be going into the new cold war building).

    Kemble โ€“ Bristol Aero collection โ€“ Operational Mark 2 on Launcher. This is the most complete Bloodhound 2 in the UK

    IWM Duxford – There was a complete Mk 2 Type 86 radar equipped missile section with one launcher and missile. There is also a Missile sans boost motors on a RUS stand aboard a Sideloader, which was used to move and load the missiles on to the launcher.

    RAF Air Defence Radar Museum โ€“ Neatishead . Operational Missile on launcher was a gate guardian, along with Phantom XV420. The Phantom got the chop last year, but the missile now belongs to the museum and the fence has been moved so it is now in the museum grounds. (Near an empty Bunker)

    Woodhall Spa – Thorpe Camp Visitors Centre. Most of a Production Mark 2 on a RUS stand. This site was the home of 2 Bloodhound Squadrons. 222 Squadron with the Mark 1, and the mighty SHARKโ€™S, 112 Squadron with the Mark 2 (who after moving to Cyprus in 1967, painted the teeth on the Squadronโ€™s Mk1 Hybird handling trainer. ๐Ÿ˜Ž It looked really cool. ๐Ÿ˜Ž )

    The Muckleburgh collection at Weybourne has an operational Mark 2 on a RUS stand outside the main entrance.

    A privately owned one was on E-bay a few months ago, Iโ€™ve seen the thing back in the summer of 2004, it had been saved from the FAST museum (who were on the point of scraping it) and it was in a very poor condition. The owner had the idea of restoring it and scratch building the boost motors, wings and a launcher with a budget of ยฃ2000 (When he told me this, my first thought was :rolleyes: โ€˜In your dreams mate!โ€™ :rolleyes: ). He was also looking into the chances of trying to ground run one of the missileโ€™s Thor engines. (A note of caution here, ๐Ÿ˜ฎ DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME!!! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ The Thor 200 series Ramjet will not light at below Mach 1.6 intake airspeed (this airspeed is also required on the two auxiliary air intake between the engines and the missile mainbody. The air from the two smaller intakes is used to pressurise the fuel tanks and drive the turbines that power the fuel pump and the hydraulics pump that powered a number of mechanical systems including part of the missileโ€™s fuel control system). Also, there has to be cooling air though the air holes at the back of the engine for the convergent / divergent nozzle. If there is not, the nozzle will melt in about 6 to 10 seconds.) Needless to say, the fact that the missile was later on E-bay says it all. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    There may be more in the UK Iโ€™ve not seen (a couple were used on SPACE CADETS, got from an aircraft savage yard, after laying in a skip).

    Overseas. There are a number in museums in Sweden and on the gates of airbases (about 6 to 8). The Bloodhound Museum at Gubel has 4 complete rounds on launchers, a cutaway green round and a pristine white one. The Swiss AF Museum Air defence hall has one hanging from the roof (Cosford should do the same in the new Cold War hall ๐Ÿ˜‰ ). Singapore AF Museum has a green one cut away on a servicing stand and a white one on launcher in the entrance hall.

    I remember them sitting pointing eastwards at the base, the maintenance of them as they were subjected to sea air must have been horrendous,

    As for the maintenance of the missile, the major load bearing structures of the airframe of both marks of missile were made of magnesium alloy. Anybody who knows anything about airframe structures will know this fact. Magnesium alloy and Salt water/Air do not mix (for those who donโ€™t know, the result is like putting an aspirin tablet into water). The Swedes and the Swiss got around the problem by keeping the missiles in air-conditioned shelters when not on the launcher. The Swedes sold about 90 back to the RAF in the late 1970โ€™s and everybody I know who worked on them, remarked on what good condition they were in. The only thing the RAF did was connect an air conditioning unit to the rear of the missile to keep the electronics dry. The missile airframes corroded very badly and a major part of the missile servicing was corrosion control.

    would they have really worked!!!

    The Single Shot Kill Probability of the Mark 2 was about 45%

    (SSPK for the Mark 1 was less than 25% ๐Ÿ˜ฎ , had they ever been used that would have been launched in salvos of 4 ๐Ÿ˜Ž . Saying that, in a letter I got from Sqn Ldr Peter Shaw, the first CO of 112 Squadron when they set up as a Bloodhound Mark 1 Squadron at Breighton. He mentioned that the first thing he expected to land in his In-Tray on the outbreak of world war 3 was a Soviet IRBM, aimed at the Thor IRBM site he was defending. Hence the Mark 1 was more for show and training purposes than designed to be used as an effective weapon system. ๐Ÿ™ )

    The Mark 2 had most of the Mark 1โ€™s design limitations designed out and in a lot of ways it was streets ahead of any other anti-air missile system (air or ground launched) at the time of its entry into service ๐Ÿ˜Ž . However further development was stopped, and other systems (both air and ground launched) overtook it :rolleyes: .

    To put it into perspective, it was only the advent of the Skyflash AAM (for the Swedes and the RAF) and the AMRAAM armed Hornet with the Swiss, which gave the three airforces a weapon with the capability to replace the Bloodhound 2 in all altitude regimes. That is why the Swiss kept the system in operation until 1999, 50 years to the day after development started at Filton. The RAF canned the system in 1991 as a cost cutting measure ๐Ÿ˜ก (the Swedes doing the same in the mid 1970โ€™s). Singapore canned their system in the mid 1990โ€™s (which were left by the RAF when we pulled out of the Far East in the early 1970โ€™s) .

    in reply to: Can anyone help me with my histroy project? #1330782
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    I am an air cadet in search of information for a history project my squdron is doing for our upcoming aviation day.

    The information we have been given is this:

    RAF.43Grp.RMU1940

    After Dunkirk, 3000 men of No.21 Aircraft Depot were withdrawn to Henlow, where they worked on unpacking, assembling, testing, modifying and repairing Hurricanes1941 Operation “Quick Force” involved 50 to 100 fitters serving on HMS Furious, and other carriers, dismantling Hurricanes for transport to Malta.

    I would be extremely grateful if anyone has any sort of information on this, if they could share it with me, as I currently have none at all. :confused:

    Thank you! ๐Ÿ™‚

    Cdt Pearson

    Cdt Pearson

    Join the 12 o’cloch High Forum at http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/ and put a request in there. I did on another subject and got a answer to a question I’d been after for months in a day

    Richie Vernon

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1331437
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    There’s another pic of what may be the same display earlier in the thread – you may fancy a serach for it, unless you posted it of course!

    ADrian

    Any idea where? I cannot find it!!!

    “some nutter”

    Very vaild comments, Slap on the wrist taken and comment removed.

    in reply to: Lightning XM172 on the move soon #1332246
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Hello All,

    Just to inform you that Lightning F1a XM172 currently residing at Booker will be moving ‘up north’ soon.

    As you may already know, ownership of this piece of British aviation heritage now lies with me and i have been given an ultimatum by the Director of Booker Airfield to move it off site no later that Friday 21st April. Why the rush? i dont know …. but thats another question!

    With this directive in place, Barry Parkhouse and i are looking to move her soon and will post details nearer the time once we have made up our ‘cunning plan’!

    Her wing tips and tail will be comming off very soon in prep for the impending road move up the M6. I will let you know dates/timing as and when i have them.

    Thats all i have for now.

    Fly Safe, Neil

    Hope the move goes well, Neil. Just to let everybody know there was a display of 60 odd aircraft profiles on two large boards in the 6 Sqn hanger at Coltishall on 1st April closure parades done by myself, apparently they went down very well with the Coltishall old boys. One of those profiles was of XM172. ๐Ÿ™‚ The last Lightning at Coltishall!!!! ๐Ÿ™‚ A smaller version of what was on the board is attached (original A4 sized).

    in reply to: Worlds oldest serving combat aircraft #2598727
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Surely the BBMF’s Spitfire Mk.IIa (P7350) must be the worlds oldest serving combat aircraft, it entered service in August 1940, and is technically on charge with the RAF.

    I don’t think she is used as an operational front or Second line combat aircraft today, however, which I think is the point of this thread.

    in reply to: Bawdsey Radar Group – Latest News #1332282
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    — OFF TOPIC —

    The Dalek contained dozens of electrical connectors and a big spiral of cable

    ๐Ÿ˜ฎ AKA THE SNAKE!!!! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    A photo of what the RAF Type 87’s looked like is attached. Photo taken at RAF Newton in September 1986 during a Families day, there is a Spitfire of the BBMF just outside the shot in the original photo. The Radar was part of the Missile Training Flight at Newton which did Technical Training for Bloodhound Mk 2, MARTEL and Red Top / Firestreak for the Binbrook boys. There was also a Lightning T-bird in the No 4 hanger where the flight was based. There was also a Missile Museum there until some time between 1983-85, the majority of which later formed the heart of the Missile Collection at Cosford. The Dalek can be seen clearly in the photo.

    Hopefully Bawdsey can fulfil their planned goals, Its a damm shame they didn’t win Restoration last year ๐Ÿ˜ก ๐Ÿ˜ก (I voted for them).

    in reply to: Bawdsey Radar Group – Latest News #1332333
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    — Off Topic —

    But ours didn’t have a concrete wall round the base! (At Aberporth – I wonder how much taxpayers’ money we fired into Cardigan Bay!)

    There is a blast roof on there as well, Itโ€™s more of a shelter than a wall. The only parts of the radar that are exposed are the head, part of the Dalek, and the Launcher Illuminator Aerials which are mounted on the side of the shelter wall. There may still be one in Singapore (as they used the T87s left by 65 Squadron who had 3). The only T87 structures that survive in the UK (that I known of) are the receiver room / base hexagon and legs at Bawdsey (two) and West Raynham (one) which were modified as Type 86 Plinths. (I’ve no idea if the three at North Coates are still there (which were also used as mounts for Type 86’s). There is also an ex-Swiss Type 87 Head Assembly and Dalek at the Muckleburgh collection at Weybourne on the North Norfolk coast.

    The tower assembly on the Type 87 radar was known as the Dalek, because , funny old thing, it looked like one.

    The total number of production Bloodhound Mk 2โ€™s fired at Aberporth was in the region of just over a 100 (17 of them being Swiss rounds). I was told in 1986 that a Bloodhound 2 firing cost in the region of ยฃ1,000,000 a shot at that time. Last rounds were fired in 1986, 3 RAF and 2 Swiss Army rounds.

    in reply to: Bawdsey Radar Group – Latest News #1332461
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    There is a Complete T87 at Gubel Bloodhound Musuem in Switzerland. (plus 8 launcher missile section with LCP Mk 2 and four missiles on lauchers). Been there twice and have lots of photos.

    What does the T87 have to do with Bawdsey? Bawdsey had two of the 47 ton monsters from between 1979 and 1987/88. They were part of 85 Squadron ‘C’ Flight, Yellow and Purple sections. Each section consisting of a T87 Radar, Launch Control Post (LCP) and six launchers with Bloodhound Mk 2. The T87 were replaced with the smaller Type 86 in 1987/88 mounted on the base structure of the T87’s. The Flight was disbanded in 1990 with the start of the draw down of the RAF Bloodhound force. The unit also had an ex-army AA4 Mk 7 radar for local tactical control.

    Bigvern1966 – Ex West Raynham Bloodhound MSF 1985 – 89

    in reply to: How would you bring down a B-2? #2598883
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    And what was thew results of the “mass human wave assaults”? Did they take the Iraqi position? I don’t remember.

    They didn’t in most cases. The Iraqi’s Gassed them! In the times that the Iranians did break though, the conditions at the time did not favour the use of Gas.

    in reply to: RAF Museum Cosford Hidden Treasures #1332630
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    Hawker P1121

    I WILL DO ANYTHING FOR A COPY OF THAT BARRY HYGATE BOOK. I MEAN ANYTHING

    I forked out $118 (cost plus postage) for that book listed on Abebooks in the US three months ago after being outbid in a serious bidding battle on E-bay (started at ยฃ28, Joined battle with 8 minutes to go at ยฃ58. Lost at ยฃ90+ when my maximum bid for ยฃ130 went in seconds too late). Book’s worth every peney. (you tell me where you can get 1-72 scale plans for all of those aircraft for less!) P1121 Fuselage forward of the wing trailing edge and a wing were completed before the project was chopped :confused: ๐Ÿ˜ก :confused: ๐Ÿ˜ก :confused: ๐Ÿ˜ก :confused: ๐Ÿ˜ก .

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1333147
    BIGVERN1966
    Participant

    This shot was taken from an old airfield close to my heart (Did first Solo there in 1983) and not that far from my Home Town for 17 years. A Belgium Air Force major in an F-84 at an Air show at Wethersfield in 1964. The only thing that PhotoShop was used for on this shot is to reduce the size of the scan from the modelling magazine I found it in. From the blur, I’d say he was moving pretty fast to boot. No idea of who’s photo it is.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,215 total)