dark light

p_shadow

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 95 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2154083
    p_shadow
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]251567[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Classic Aircraft Series from Key Publishing #2138478
    p_shadow
    Participant

    No.1 Phantom
    No.5 Top Gun Combat
    No.9 Allied Airpower

    in reply to: WORLD AIR FORCE ROUNDELS #2130149
    p_shadow
    Participant

    The first six RoAF F-16s left Monte Real AB in Portugal around 8 o’clock this morning, made a fuel-stop at Aviano (http://www.foxtwo.it/carpathian-vipers/) and landed at Fetesti AB around noon. F-16C “202” is an old PS-job

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2169608
    p_shadow
    Participant

    Those L-39 shots were taken at Luanda for sure.

    If you need help translating portuguese send me a PM

    in reply to: Embraer KC-390 rolled out #2182250
    p_shadow
    Participant

    One example… Portugal’s interest is pure political/economical. In the meantime PoAF’s C-130 fleet will be modernized and will soldier on at least some 5/7 more years after that. Won’t expect any replacement for a while

    in reply to: Embraer KC-390 rolled out #2182539
    p_shadow
    Participant

    They have $1.7 billion invested and 60 total orders.

    There aren’t 60 total orders. Most countries only expressed interest in a future purchase

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2160619
    p_shadow
    Participant

    Chadian Alouette III at Ogma in Portugal:

    http://ex-ogma.blogspot.pt/2008/10/alouette-iii-do-chade.html

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2160620
    p_shadow
    Participant

    double post

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2181809
    p_shadow
    Participant

    especially interesting the white-painted Hip carrying reg 5U-MHA.
    http://www.voaafrique.com/media/phot…s/2695886.html

    http://gdb.voanews.com/3B939023-DE20-45F0-993E-438DEAA44CF0_cx0_cy18_cw87_w974_n_s_r1.jpg

    Probably Niger’s AF

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2185815
    p_shadow
    Participant

    Obviously a mistake somewhere, or am I reading it wrong? There were only ever 60 KC-10s constructed and delivered to only one customer, the USAF. 59 still remain in service. Where did the ‘150’ figure come from?

    The title is misleading. It is probably refering how many times Northrop has performed that kind of maintenance on USAF KC-10s.

    in reply to: Horrible aircraft deals in the past 30 years #2186512
    p_shadow
    Participant

    The Romenians signed two contracts, one with Portugal for 12 F-16 MLU Tape 6, basic logistical suport and training for 186 millions Euros, and another with the USA through the FMS for further logistical equipment, two link 16 ground stations and weapons.
    http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/romania-weapons-equipment-and-support-f-16-block-15-mlu-aircraft

    For the money they´ve spent, its a bargain, for comparison, the leasing of a sqn of Gripens is costing the Hungarians 130 million US$… a year.

    Tape 5.2R precisely. Link is down but here’s its content:

    WASHINGTON, Nov 8, 2013 – The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress today of a possible Foreign Military Sale to Romania of weapons, equipment, and support for 12 F-16 MLU Block 15 for an estimated cost of $457 million.

    The Government of Romania has requested a possible sale of weapons, equipment, and support for 12 F-16 MLU Block 15 aircraft that will be procured through a third party transfer from Portugal. Articles and services will include:

    13 Embedded Global Positioning Systems/Inertial Navigation Systems (EGPS/INS) with GPS Security Devices, Airborne
    3 AN/ALQ-131 Electronic Countermeasure Pods
    30 AIM-120C Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM)
    5 AIM-120C Captive Air Training Missiles (CATMs)
    60 AIM-9M Sidewinder Missiles
    4 AIM-9M CATMs
    48 LAU-129 Launchers
    10 GBU-12 Enhanced Guided Bomb Units
    18 AGM-65H/KB Maverick Missiles
    4 AGM-65 CATMs
    15 Multifunctional Information Distribution System/Low Volume Terminals
    2 Multifunctional Information Distribution System Ground Support Systems

    Also included are spare and repair parts, support equipment, tanker support, ferry services, repair and return services, software development/integration, test and equipment, supply support, personnel training and training equipment, publications and technical data, U.S. Government and contractor technical services, and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated cost is $457 million.

    The proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve security of a NATO ally which continues to be an important force for political stability and economic progress. The proposed sale of weapons, equipment, and support for the transferred F-16s will support Romania’s needs for its own self-defense and enhance the interoperability of these aircraft with those of the U.S. and other NATO nations.

    The proposed sale will support the Romanian Air Force’s (RoAF) efforts to equip and utilize the 12 F-16 aircraft it is procuring from Portugal. These aircraft will provide the RoAF with a fleet of modernized multi-role combat aircraft. This proposed sale of weapons, equipment, and follow-on F-16 support will enable Romania to support both its own air defense needs and coalition operations. The RoAF will have no difficultly absorbing these systems into its armed forces.

    The proposed sale of this follow-on support will not alter the basic military balance in the region.

    The principal contractors will be:

    Elbit Systems of America Fort Worth, Texas

    Pratt and Whitney East Hartford, Connecticut

    BAE Systems Inc. Arlington, Virginia

    Lockheed Martin Corp. Fort Worth, Texas

    Northrup Grumman Aerospace Systems Redondo Beach, California

    ViaSat Inc. Carlsbad, California

    Data Link Solutions LLC Cedar Rapids, Iowa

    Snap-On Inc. Kenosha, Wisconsin

    Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC McLean, Virginia

    There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.

    Implementation of this proposed sale will not require the assignment of additional U.S. Government or contractor representatives to Romania.

    There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.

    This notice of a potential sale is required by law and does not mean the sale has been concluded.

    Not a bargain at all but still the best deal for Romania, imo.

    in reply to: Horrible aircraft deals in the past 30 years #2187071
    p_shadow
    Participant

    And for what you are actually going to pay for them (186 million of Euros, the Portuguese MOD detailed the contract, 108,2 millions will be spent with the aircrafts, spare parts and training nine pilots and 79 technicians, the remaining 78 millons will be what the POAF will actually receive), you wouldnt get half of a Gripen built in Romenia.

    newer model F-16C/D’s (Block 40’s, witch the US was offering for free) would have made more sense.

    Read the same somewhere a few years ago but that didn’t make sense. Romania is paying circa one third of the F-16 deal’s total cost to Portugal, the rest is going mainly to the US…

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2200099
    p_shadow
    Participant

    It’s just your tired ol’ eyes 🙂 See the light-colored patch behind the front seat? That is actually the glass window of the rear cockpit canopy (which is closed)

    Poor me, i have to spend more time looking at “big” air forces, looking at the small ones is taking a toll on my Mk.1s! In the meantime…

    Angola
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]239312[/ATTACH]
    CAR
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]239313[/ATTACH]
    Eq.Guinea
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]239314[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]239315[/ATTACH]
    Guinea Rep.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]239316[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]239317[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]239318[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]239319[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]239320[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2200457
    p_shadow
    Participant

    That’s because it’s a Su-22UM-3K twin-seater.. Serial is I30

    My first thoughts too but i’m missing the back seat. Or it’s just my tired eyes…

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2200601
    p_shadow
    Participant

    Thanks.
    And thanks for Su-22M-2K pictures (especially the one with Recce pod). I didn’t know they received this variant.

    Also of notice in the first picture is the unknown/unusual (to me) serial on M-4K and the heli in the background

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 95 total)