dark light

Lyffe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 278 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Help please: 137 Sqdn Combat loss & French/German files #1135222
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Paul,

    You could trying copying your request to the RAF Commands Forum at

    http://www.rafcommands.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=1&order=desc

    It has a number of contributors based in France/Belgium and Holland who might well be able to help. Obviously you need to register first.

    Edit: You could also obtain his records from the Australian National Archives – someone at RAFC will point you in the right direction.

    Brian

    in reply to: Halifax Cockpit Project #1130727
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Just an aside about the ‘Semper in Excreta” nose art of LW625, which I believe was withe 192 Sqn (radar countermeasures).

    The “Semper in Excreta” was originally designed by Flt Lt Douglas Bisgood, OC of 1403 Met Flight, not long after it formed at Bircham Newton in 1941. At the time 1403 was equipped with Blenheim MkIVs, and the design (an umbrella over skull and crossed bones) was meant to reflect the crews would fly when everyone else was grounded by the weather – in other words they were “Always in the ****) (source: “Even the birds were walking” by Peter Rackliff and John Kington.)

    Bisgood survived the war but was killed on 18 April 1947 when Halifax ST807 of 202 Sqn, failed to return from a routine met reconnaissance sortie out of Aldergrove.

    Given the role of 192 Sqn one can understand why the artwork was ‘lifted’ for LW625 – it was probably often Semper in Excreta itself.

    Brian

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1113447
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Don’t know if this reference has been seen; not a movie but the photos are interesting:

    http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1941/1941%20-%202950.html

    Brian

    in reply to: Observer's Brevet. #1112995
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Adopted 23 August 1915, declared obsolete September 1942 although some continued to be awarded on graduation to LACs successfully completing courses in navigation in the USA until well into 1943.

    Source: Jefford’s “Observers and Navigators” page 18 (for adoption) and pages 162-163.

    Brian

    in reply to: Aircraft type please (1946) #1099189
    Lyffe
    Participant

    That was quick Pagen – much appreciated.

    Brian

    in reply to: Aircraft type please (1946) #1099095
    Lyffe
    Participant

    As the photo was taken in 1946, and the trees in the distance are in full leaf I’d suggest the summer – but I appreciatec that’s a bit vague. I’ve had two letters from the lady who sent the photo (one of three), but it’s difficult to tie down approximate dates from them. I’ll try and find out more this evening.

    Brian

    in reply to: Aircraft type please (1946) #1098863
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Gentlemen,

    The photo does indeed show the prototype Gemini – it had been sent to Buc to be viewed by, and demonstrated to, the French in the hope of making sales. The photo was taken in either September or October 1946, shortly after my lady was posted to the airfield. She recalls to colour scheme as being ‘reddish’.

    It is just possible there is also a close-up photo, but that needs digging out. The only other small point of interest is that the photo was taken using a Box Brownie camera.

    Brian

    in reply to: Aircraft type please (1946) #1098724
    Lyffe
    Participant

    That’s what I like – real servitude Resmorah. It would be interesting to know if the museum has anything about this visit – if not I’m sure the photographer would be only to happy to add to the collection.

    Brian

    in reply to: How do I search for old posts #749859
    Lyffe
    Participant

    My apologies, I thought I’d posted a ‘Thank you’ but I obviously didn’t.  Yes, that was the thread I was looking for and I’m very grateful for your help avion ancien.  Merci.

    Lyffe
    Participant

    You could also try page 427 of his obituary at https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsbm.1994.0023 . I’m just Googling his name plus D-day.

    Lyffe
    Participant

    It does not answer your questions but you could try https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/lapworth-museum/about/object-sh… for starters.

    in reply to: How the mighty has fallen (Quiet) #764947
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Although I’ve been a member for nearly 15 years but am not exactly a prolific contributor, I do follow threads that are of interest to me.  Out of curiosity, following MFs post I Googled a thread I’d started in 2006 about the 1977 U2 accident at Akrotiri, using search words Akrotiri, U2, Accident, Key. Much to my surprise the whole thread, which ran for nearly 10 years, came up verbatim (if one ignores the adverts).  I was quite pleased, especially as one of the last posts was made by one of the accident’s investigators who provided a comprehensive account of events.   

    Perhaps I was just lucky in that I was able to use specific search terms which, I appreciate, is not always possible.  (https://www.key.aero/forum/historic-aviation/56680-akrotiri-u2-accident… )

    Brian

    in reply to: Halifax crash, Cheltenham, 1944 #765137
    Lyffe
    Participant

    On second thoughts my ‘199’ might be ‘198’

    Brian

    in reply to: Halifax crash, Cheltenham, 1944 #765138
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Further to my previous post, and with rafachelt’s permission, I’ve attached some images of the recently found fragment of wreckage, in the hope our experts could confirm it comes from a MkIII Halifax.

    The identity stamp reads 57773 B9; below  is another, partially hidden, stamp which starts with 199 (gap) then what looks like the top of a ‘T’ followed by a gap then another ‘T’. 

    Any advice  would be appreciated.

    Brian

    in reply to: Halifax crash, Cheltenham, 1944 #765147
    Lyffe
    Participant

    There has been ongoing discussion about this accident since last September on the RAF Commands forum at http://www.rafcommands.com/forum/showthread.php?26587-78-SQN-RAF-Loss-o….  It is possible that a fragment of the wreckage has been found recently – see #67 of the thread.

    Brian

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 278 total)